eDemocracy

eDemocracy

Exploring the social and political impacts of technology

eDemocracyEstablished in 1997, the eDemocracy Programme was the first dedicated research unit to explore the political and social impact of information and communications technology (ICT). Today, we undertake research and evaluation and produce commentary and analysis. Our work explores the many faces of digital participation, engagement, political campaigning and parliamentary process. We seek both to understand eDemocracy and to advance the debate surrounding it.

The eDemocracy Programme is:

  • Andy Williamson - Director
  • Barry Griffiths - Project Manager
  • Dr Laura Miller - Senior Researcher
  • Karishma Desai - Intern

Contact us at edemocracy[at]hansard.lse.ac.uk.

rss View RSS feed

  • Blogging and freedom of expression

    eDemocracy, blogging and freedom of expression The internet is a valuable tool to connect people with like minds and it has been used extensively to raise awareness of oppression and anti-democratic practices around the world. But writing about your government can come at a high price and some bloggers expose themselves to real dangers every time they write. Even in the West, rules designed to ensure fairness at election time can limit the rights of bloggers.

  • Since when did eGovernment need the Royal Mail?

    eDemocracy by mail is not a good idea! eGovernment is supposed to transform services, save time and money. However, it also has to make life easier for citizens. When the design of the system actually gets in the way, it’s a barrier to service delivery and likely to put users off.

  • Overcoming the ostrich approach to broadband

    eDemocracy needs broadband strategy - not head in the sand Broadband is a critical delivery medium for eDemocracy but Ofcom’s latest statistics suggest uptake has stalled in many places. Whilst it’s positive to see rural adoption increasing, overall we are still lagging well behind anything amounting to digital ubiquity. Until this is overcome, the benefits of eDemocracy will remain off-limits to many – and in some cities, to the majority.

  • Researching with Communities - new book published

    Hansard Society eDemocracy Director, Andy Williamson, launched a new book at the end of April called Researching with Communities: Grounded perspectives on engaging communities in research. It provides guidance, examples and discussions for researchers that are aiming to promote a community voice in their work. This book looks at the issues from an international perspective with chapters drawn from a range of disciplines including; community development, mental health, migration and refugees, and community technology. It draws on the experiences of researchers and community practitioners to explore what community based research means in a variety of settings and how it can be carried out meaningfully, respectfully and inclusively.

  • Could eDemocracy make the democratic deficit worse?

    effective eDemocracy requires access for all The internet had a bit-part in last week’s local government elections but its importance in central and local government continues to increase. Those of us who advocate for eDemocracy as a way of increasing participation need to also consider strategies for getting more people online and using the internet effectively. Failure to do this could make the democratic deficit worse.

  • From government online to opposition online

    Canadian Parliament MPs websites have matured from the simple and garish to being slick, template-driven and branded. In the UK, however, the rise in the use of the web has mirrored an era of political stability, with no change of government. Experience elsewhere suggests that when a party loses power the way its MPs use the web changes too. As the UK draws closer to a general election, political hopefuls are turning to online campaigning tools but are they on a level playing field or do incumbent MPs have a significant advantage?

  • Getting personal makes blogging a success

    image subject to Parliamentary Copyright. One month after launching, Lords of the Blog has exceeded our early expectations. It’s not just a passive place to learn about Britain’s upper house but has become somewhere that citizens can directly interact with peers in a way that wasn’t possible before. It's also been an eye opener for many in terms of how engaging and down-to-earth peers can be!

  • On a web and a prayer

    eDemocracy - Parliamentary ePetitions This week, Parliament’s Procedure Committee strongly endorsed the idea of ePetitions. Whilst there’s clearly a long way to go, their report presents a strong argument for ePetitions and recommends moving ahead. There’s obviously a lot of work to be done but the report’s focus on process over technology is to be welcomed a step in the right direction.

  • Lords of the Blog interviewed by Catch 21

    The most recent Hansard Society project - Lords of the Blog - has so far taken the world of blogging by storm. The House of Lords appears to be an institution much misunderstood by the public, many of whom have no idea what Peers do and who inhabits the second chamber, but this is starting to change. The project, commissioned by the House of Lords authorities, is in a 6 month experimental phase after which its sucess will be evaluated by the Hansard Society and its contributors will take sole control.

    Catch 21, an internet televsion channel run by young people for young people, has interviewed two of the most prolific and enthusiastic peers in this project, Lord Norton and Lord Tyler, to give an introduction to what the project is all about and what it involves for them. Watch the interview here.

  • eDemocracy, innovation and the risk of failure

    eDemocracy, innovation and the risk of failure Innovation theory tells us to accept failure as not only inevitable but a good thing – without failure there is no success. As the civil service is being encouraged to become more innovative, this point should not be lost on eDemocracy practitioners. We need a culture of risk and innovation if government is to transform.

Page: 1 of 3

| Home | Media | About Us | Programmes | Events | Resources | Contact Us |