To mark the launch of ‘Britain Votes 2017’, the first major study of the 2017 general election, five of the book’s contributors - including polling guru Professor Sir John Curtice - outlined their findings at an event on 20 March at the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Here are the evening’s top tweets.
Full audio
You can listen to the event in full via SoundCloud here.
The panel take their seats
And here we go, the launch of #BritainVotes2017 getting started with Sir John Curtice, @JonTonge, @KateDommett, @Eugoes and @ProfTimBale, chaired by @carolynquinncqpic.twitter.com/CrPQdY5kFR
— C Leston-Bandeira (@estrangeirada) 20 March 2018
. @RuthFox01 introduces the new book 'Britain Votes 2017', the first academic study of the general election in 2017 - 26 academic experts on the general election. pic.twitter.com/eQbJVDRxfH
— UK in a Changing EU (@UKandEU) 20 March 2018
.@carolynquinncq - in the radio studio we get early access to John Curtice's election poll - in June, our jaws dropped #BritainVotes2017
— UK in a Changing EU (@UKandEU) 20 March 2018
“Hung parliaments are now more likely”
@whatukthinks on good form for the #BritainVotes2017 debate. Argues future hung parliaments may depend on small territorially-defined parties, and that current cleavages in electorate can get more pronounced if no reform of electoral system
— Sara Hagemann (@sarahagemann) 20 March 2018
Where are the marginals? #BritainVotes2017 hung parliaments are now more likely. pic.twitter.com/QyrqD5kHzR
— Keeble Brown (@KeebleBrown) 20 March 2018
Sir John Curtice: The return of two party politics was slightly exaggerated: there was still success for smaller parties, as long as they had geographically concentrated support #BritainVotes2017pic.twitter.com/MXL7CFpfs2
— UK in a Changing EU (@UKandEU) 20 March 2018
Sir John Curtice: key to understanding why hung parliaments are more likely is the long-term decline in the number of marginal seats. This is because Britain has been polarising geographically since 1955 #BritainVotes2017pic.twitter.com/eZ2WRWwlpp
— UK in a Changing EU (@UKandEU) 20 March 2018
“Getting my psephological geek on!”
Getting my psephological geek on!
— Craig Beaumont (@craigie_b) 20 March 2018
Surprising swings, biases and other historical insight from @whatukthinks re the 2017 General Election votes, electoral system and results. @ProfTimBale now taking apart the different ‘ground games’#BritainVotes2017@HansardSocietypic.twitter.com/oTeW8wokOr
.@ProfTimBale notes that the strategy of hoovering up UKIP was a partial success, but it didn't happen enough to flip seats and meant the burning of a lot of Remain voters #BritainVotes2017
— UK in a Changing EU (@UKandEU) 20 March 2018
. @ProfTimBale argues the party can do something about its leader and its policies - the structural problems with the party membership and organisation, identified by @ESRCPtyMembers - are more diffixult to address #BritainVotes2017pic.twitter.com/9ir5fwRg0z
— UK in a Changing EU (@UKandEU) 20 March 2018
. @Eugoes 48% were in favour of higher public spending, which was a change in mood that worked in Labour's favour. Public spending cuts and wage stagnation had a real effect. The ideal backdrop for the Labour manifesto and its core retail offers in 2017 #BritainVotes2017pic.twitter.com/u5IkiYDiFx
— UK in a Changing EU (@UKandEU) 20 March 2018
Digital “not as revolutionary as sometimes thought”
Now our 4th speaker Dr Kate Dommett @KateDommett on the digital campaign. Digital important, but maybe not as revolutionary as sometimes thought. Quotes a party worker: 'Digital is just the new typewriter'. Just a new tool to do what parties have always done #BritainVotes2017 17/
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
Dr Kate Dommett @KateDommett: Digital campaigning can't be done effectively at short notice. Needs l-t investment in infrastructure, databases, skills #BritainVotes2017 18/
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
Dr Kate Dommett @KateDommett: Facebook does add new sources of data. Lab tried to integrate this with more traditional types (doorstep). But all still reliant on skills & scale of resources at party HQ - to be able to do something effective with the data #BritainVotes2017 19/
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
#BritainVotes2017@KateDommett says digital was important in 2017, esp grassroots genuine sharing - but overall it was not revolutionary; key thing this time is about change of control, as organisations doing the most interesting work weren’t parties but others
— Craig Beaumont (@craigie_b) 20 March 2018
Dr Kate Dommett @KateDommett: But digital platforms also offer opportunities to organisations other than parties. Can allow party material to be spread more widely than otherwise. But also leaves parties vulnerable if something goes rogue #BritainVotes2017 20/
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
Which party benefited from Brexit?
Q&A now. And it's our 1st mention of #Brexit! @Eugoes says remainer vote boosted Lab somewhat, but issue maybe not decisive. But John Curtice says Brexit did make a difference - more to Cons than Lab. Cons picked up some Leave voters but lost more Remainers #BritainVotes2017 21/
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
On party membership, Prof Tim Bale @ProfTimBale suggests the Lab experience might make the Con party *more* wary of strengthening membership role, not less #BritainVotes2017 23/
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
Prof John Curtice: million $ question is whether #Brexit division will have waned by 2022, or whether we'll still be arguing about it & it'll still shape the vote #BritainVotes2017 24/
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
#BritainVotes2017 a key comment: #Brexit makes the 2017 election one from which lessons cannot really be learned. @JonTonge
— Keeble Brown (@KeebleBrown) 20 March 2018
On potential Con leadership succession, @ProfTimBale suggests it'd be hard for a Remainer to get into final 2. Johnson's time probably passed. If he could get past parl party, Rees-Mogg would be popular among members, so it's probably him + AN other #BritainVotes2017 25/
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
On leader Q, @ProfTimBale says having to do a competitive l'ship election in 2016 would have exposed May: lesson for parties. John Curtice: May even worse than Gordon Brown in this respect; @ProfTimBale points out Brown also didn't fight a l'ship election #BritainVotes2017 29/
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
During Q&A time one of our scholars posed the question about the future of Conservative party leadership, even asking the panel if they could speculate! @ProfTimBale gave the best answer he could! #BritainVotes2017https://t.co/9jLR539YlO
— Hansard Scholars (@HansardScholars) March 20, 2018
Grab a copy of ‘Britain Votes 2017’
And that's it! #BritainVotes2017 duly launched. If you're not here tonight, get your copy from @ouppolitics here 30/ https://t.co/nrjTzBnosg
— Hansard Society (@HansardSociety) 20 March 2018
*‘Britain Votes 2017’ is the 2017 edition of the regular Parliamentary Affairs publication on each UK general election
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
Latest
What to look out for in Parliament in Autumn 2020
Politics in Autumn 2020 will continue to be dominated by Coronavirus and the negotiations with the EU, as the end of the post-Brexit transition period approaches on 31 December. But what will this mean for parliamentary business in the coming months, and what scope will there be to tackle other issues? We pick 15 things to look out for.
How is the Petitions Committee representing the public amid the procedural and practical restrictions of the Covid crisis?
Catherine McKinnell MP, Chair of the House of Commons Petitions Committee, sets out how the Covid-19 crisis has significantly increased the public’s use of e-petitions while limiting the House’s ability to debate them. This has prompted the Committee to innovate, to ensure that petitioners’ voices are heard during the crisis.
Demands to recall the House of Commons over this summer’s exams fiasco reinforce the case for taking the process out of government hands
In a crisis the House of Commons is hamstrung if it is in recess, for MPs are not masters of their own House. While any MP can make representations to the government and the House of Commons Speaker to request a recall, under Standing Orders only a formal request from ministers to the Speaker can actually trigger one.
Parliaments and Coronavirus (collection)
The Coronavirus pandemic has presented parliaments with significant technical, procedural and political challenges, at Westminster and around the world. This page brings together our Covid-19 content, covering the UK Parliament’s adaptation to the crisis, UK Coronavirus-related Statutory Instruments, and the responses of other legislatures around the world.
Why MPs should back the Djanogly amendments to the Trade Bill on parliamentary scrutiny of trade agreements
MPs should take the opportunity to show the government and their constituents that they want to have more say on free trade agreements than they did when the UK was inside the EU.
Financial Scrutiny: the Estimates Cycle
In order to incur expenditure the government needs to obtain approval from Parliament for its departmental spending plans. The annual Estimates process is the means by which the House of Commons controls the government’s plans for the spending of money raised through taxation.