On 20 March, Professor Sir John Curtice and a panel of leading commentators outlined their findings at the launch of the first major study of the 2017 general election, ‘Britain Votes 2017’.

Listen again

About

The general election was one of the most extraordinary contests of recent times. Widespread assumptions that it would be a one-sided election - a coronation rather than a contest - were confounded as Theresa May mislaid her majority and a hung Parliament emerged.

  • How did the Conservatives achieve the largest share of the vote by any party since the landslide election in 1997 but still not secure a majority?
  • Is any party likely to secure an overall majority in the future or are narrow or non-existent parliamentary majorities to become the norm not the exception?
  • Why was Labour’s left-wing manifesto not the ‘suicide note’ that most commentators anticipated?
  • In many respects it was a novel election campaign, but what made the difference? Was it the ability to deploy activists on the doorstep, provide favourable visuals of packed rallies for traditional media, or innovations in digital campaigning?

Join leading analysts and commentators to discuss these questions and more as they present the latest findings from their research on the dramatic election and assess what it all means for the future of British politics.

Copies of ‘Britain Votes 2017’ will be available for purchase at a special launch offer price. The event will be followed by a reception with drinks and light refreshments.

Speakers

Chair: Carolyn Quinn
BBC radio presenter across a range of political and current affairs programmes including Westminster Hour and PM

Professor Sir John Curtice
Professor of Politics at the University of Strathclyde and Chief Commentator at What UK Thinks: EU

Professor Tim Bale
Professor of Politics at Queen Mary University of London and Deputy Director of the Mile End Institute

Dr Kate Dommett
Lecturer in the Public Understanding of Politics at the University of Sheffield

Dr Eunice Goes
Associate Professor of Politics at Richmond University and BBC Dateline London panelist

Professor Jonathan Tonge
Co-editor of ‘Britain Votes 2017’ and Professor of Politics at the University of Liverpool

‘Britain Votes 2017’ is a special edition of the Hansard Society’s journal, Parliamentary Affairs. It has been co-edited by Professor Jon Tonge, Professor Cristina Leston-Bandeira and Dr Stuart Wilks-Heeg and is published in partnership with Oxford University Press.

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

Brexit, 29 March
blog / 18.03.19

Changing EU ‘exit day’ by Statutory Instrument

‘Exit day’ in UK law will need to be changed by Statutory Instrument in the last week of March, if the UK and EU agree an extension to the Article 50 period beyond its default 29 March expiry date.

Changing EU ‘exit day’ by Statutory Instrument
Westminster Lens logo, Houses of Parliament
blog / 18.03.19

Westminster Lens: Brexit Statutory Instruments Dashboard

In the run-up to the UK’s exit from the EU on 29 March 2019 we will be tracking the progress made by government and Parliament in preparing the statute book for exit day. Our analysis draws on parliamentary data and our own Statutory Instrument Tracker which we built several years ago to support our research on delegated legislation.

Westminster Lens: Brexit Statutory Instruments Dashboard
The Independent Group of MPs at Nandos
blog / 04.03.19

The Independent Group of MPs: will they have disproportionate influence in the House of Commons?

The roles occupied by members of The Independent Group - particularly on select committees, where they retain a number of important posts and command two and a half times as many seats as the Liberal Democrats – could give them more influence than their small, non-party status might normally be expected to accord them.

The Independent Group of MPs: will they have disproportionate influence in the House of Commons?
Liam Fox negotiating India trade deal
blog / 21.02.19

Commons’ new trade agreement debate is a start, but far from ideal

In the House of Commons’ first debate today on potential new trade deals, two things are worth watching out for: the nature of the occasion itself; and any further information it elicits from the government about the process for making new trade agreements beyond the debate itself.

Commons’ new trade agreement debate is a start, but far from ideal
Photo of a stack of Evening Standard newspapers
media / coverage

In the rush to prepare for Brexit, parliamentary scrutiny will suffer

The cancellation of this week’s House of Commons recess provided the government with an extra few days to hold debates on affirmative Brexit SIs. But the low number of debates makes it a wasted opportunity. The government can get its Brexit SIs into force by 29 March, but probably only at the expense of what limited scrutiny already takes place for SIs.

In the rush to prepare for Brexit, parliamentary scrutiny will suffer
Prev
Next