Brexit could strengthen Parliament or weaken it. This applies to its standing in relation to both the government and the public. Given the promise that leaving the EU means ‘taking back control’, the way in which Parliament manages the Brexit process and its post-Brexit role will be among the criteria for judging whether the UK ‘makes a success of it’.
In one scenario, the UK emerges into a post-Brexit political landscape with the executive empowered, not Parliament. Parliament is not seen by either the government or the public to have made much positive difference to the nature of Brexit or the public’s understanding of or engagement with the process. In the other scenario, Parliament seizes the opportunity - arguably, the mandate - arising from the EU referendum to assert its role as a key site for information-gathering and dissemination, policy generation, consensus-building and decision-making.
What we are doing
We are researching and reporting on Parliament’s handling of Brexit - across its scrutiny of government, its legislative work, and its role in the international treaty-making and -unmaking that will be involved. The EU (Withdrawal) Bill and associated legislation are a particular focus of our work, building on our track record of detailed research on delegated legislation and its scrutiny.
We are also looking ahead to Parliament in the post-Brexit era, identifying structures and procedures that will need to change, and capabilities and resources that may need to be different. Among other issues, we are looking at the role Parliament might play in the UK’s post-Brexit international trade agreements.
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
Whilst the *Miller* case may be seen as a victory for Parliament, it simultaneously highlights significant constitutional weaknesses on issues such as devolution and the role of referendums. Is it time to consider whether the UK constitution needs more legal as opposed to political regulation?
In Canada, the ‘professional politician’ remains the exception rather than the rule, and MPs with prior political experience don’t have an advantage in the development of their parliamentary careers.
If the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee published regular 'Metrics for Global Britain' it could attach clear indicators to an otherwise politicised term, enhancing the committee's scrutiny work and providing hooks for boosting its public and media profile. In evidence to the committee published in July, we explained how.
MPs are setting up the new sifting committee for delegated legislation under the EU (Withdrawal) Act, but the new procedure simply bolts a toothless sift onto the front of existing inadequate procedures.
At a time of political upheaval – with questions being asked about the leadership, policies and competence of both main UK parties – our Audit of Political Engagement reveals some interesting findings about the ways in which Conservative and Labour supporters view these factors differently and how their importance has changed over time.
As the EU (Withdrawal) Bill arrives back in the House of Commons for consideration of House of Lords amendments, this briefing paper for MPs sets out our concerns about three amendments - 110, 10 and 4 - concerning scrutiny of delegated powers and Statutory Instruments.