On the evening of Thursday May 5 2011, 23 men and women discovered that they had been elected for the first time to the National Assembly for Wales. In one fell swoop the membership of over a third of the Assembly had changed, the greatest turnover of representation since the institution was founded in 1999.
Within a week Assembly Members (AMs) would take their seats at the first sitting of the Fourth Assembly, and be expected – by the public, their party and the media – to hit the ground running as effective representatives.
But what is it like to make that rapid transition from being a member of the public to being an elected Member of the Assembly? How do AMs learn the ropes in a new and challenging political environment? How do they decide what they are going to do and how they are going to do it? And do they have the resources to carry out their role effectively? How do they balance the expectations and demands of their constituents, their party, the media and others? What are they hoping to achieve, and how does the reality of the experience match up to their expectations? In short, what is it like to be a Member of the National Assembly during their earliest months in office?
As the Assembly nears its 15th anniversary in 2014, the question of the experience of new AMs has added pertinence. It is still a relatively new democratic institution but in its short life it has undergone considerable change in its powers and structures, and there is a live debate underway – both inside and outside the Senedd1 – about the need for further reform. With this Fourth Assembly being referred to by some as a ‘transitional Assembly’2 the views of Assembly Members will be crucial to shaping any future changes. From the outset the Assembly aspired to be different from Westminster; not just in its structures and processes but also in seeking to establish a more open and consensual politics, and inclusive and family-friendly working culture. So what do the new Members think about the way the Assembly operates and the powers at its disposal? What would they like to see changed? And how do they feel their role is perceived both by the public and the media?
Since the summer of 2011 the Hansard Society has been monitoring the role and work of the new AMs through surveys, interviews, and personal observation of their work, supplemented by discussions with Assembly staff, to try and answer these questions. Details of the research methodology can be found in the appendix. Kindly supported in part by the Assembly Commission, this study forms part of a wider comparative study the Society has conducted into the experiences of newly elected representatives at Westminster, Holyrood and the Dáil Éireann, the full results of which will be published later in 2013. In the meantime, this briefing paper sets out the core findings of our research into the stark realities of life as an elected member in Cardiff Bay. Like most other elected roles, there is no real job description; indeed, as this research shows, it is a job that perhaps defies a job description.
Table of contents
- The new AMs: their background and the road to Cardiff Bay
- Arriving at the Senedd
- The role and work of a new Assembly Member
- The workings of the Assembly
- One year on
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
Whilst the *Miller* case may be seen as a victory for Parliament, it simultaneously highlights significant constitutional weaknesses on issues such as devolution and the role of referendums. Is it time to consider whether the UK constitution needs more legal as opposed to political regulation?
In Canada, the ‘professional politician’ remains the exception rather than the rule, and MPs with prior political experience don’t have an advantage in the development of their parliamentary careers.
If the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee published regular 'Metrics for Global Britain' it could attach clear indicators to an otherwise politicised term, enhancing the committee's scrutiny work and providing hooks for boosting its public and media profile. In evidence to the committee published in July, we explained how.
MPs are setting up the new sifting committee for delegated legislation under the EU (Withdrawal) Act, but the new procedure simply bolts a toothless sift onto the front of existing inadequate procedures.
At a time of political upheaval – with questions being asked about the leadership, policies and competence of both main UK parties – our Audit of Political Engagement reveals some interesting findings about the ways in which Conservative and Labour supporters view these factors differently and how their importance has changed over time.
As the EU (Withdrawal) Bill arrives back in the House of Commons for consideration of House of Lords amendments, this briefing paper for MPs sets out our concerns about three amendments - 110, 10 and 4 - concerning scrutiny of delegated powers and Statutory Instruments.