The first comprehensive study of the delegated legislation system in nearly a century, The Devil is in the Detail: Parliament and Delegated Legislation opens up the process, exploring how decisions are made about what goes in to primary and what goes in to delegated legislation, and who makes them.
Most of the UK’s general public law is made not through Acts of Parliament but through delegated (or secondary) legislation generally in the form of Statutory Instruments. It is crucial to the effective operation of government from the social security system to immigration rules, legal aid to food labelling, rubbish bin collections to the national curriculum. But despite the volume and importance of such legislation, remarkably little public and media attention is paid to it.
The Devil is in the Detail: Parliament and Delegated Legislation opens up the delegated legislation process, exploring how decisions are made about what goes in to primary and what goes in to secondary legislation and who makes them. It looks at the evolution of delegated legislation, how the process works in both Houses of Parliament, and examines a number of legislative case studies that illustrate different aspects of the flaws and defects in the current system.
The Devil is in the Detail: Parliament and Delegated Legislation concludes that the present system of scrutiny is broken and sets out a range of recommendations for comprehensive reform.
Table of contents
- Context and history: delagated legislation through the years
- The life-cycle: delegating power in the parental Act
- The life-cycle: Statutory Instruments
- Public Bodies Act 2011
- Draft Deregulation Bill 2013
- Localism Act 2011
- Welfare Reform Act 2012
- Policing and Crime Act 2009
- Banking Act 2009
- The efficacy of the parliamentary scrutiny process
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
In the run-up to the UK’s exit from the EU on 29 March 2019 we will be tracking the progress made by government and Parliament in preparing the statute book for exit day. Our analysis draws on parliamentary data and our own Statutory Instrument Tracker which we built several years ago to support our research on delegated legislation.
Attention is focused on the ‘meaningful vote’ on the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement, but the Agreement will also be subject to a parliamentary ratification consent procedure, under the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, notable mainly for not involving a vote.
In November 2018 the House of Lords Liaison Committee published our evidence to its review of investigative and scrutiny committees. We made wide-ranging recommendations aimed at improving legislative scrutiny, facilitating more effective horizon-scanning and addressing post-Brexit scrutiny challenges.
Following the controversy surrounding the breaking of the Philip Green court injunction, has the time come for new restrictions on the use of parliamentary privilege, as previously suggested by a Joint Committee of both Houses of Parliament? Former Clerk of the Parliaments Sir David Beamish outlines the legal and procedural issues that inform the debate.
In our evidence on procedural arrangements for the ‘meaningful vote’ on the prospective UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement, we argue that the possibly unique nature and extraordinary political circumstances of the vote justify an extraordinary and imaginative remedy.