Schools making up an ‘electorate’ of over 46,000 young people returned their results to the Hansard Society’s 2019 Mock Elections, which were held to coincide with the December general election and continued a series extending back over 50 years. Labour emerged as the clear ‘winner’ of the 2019 mock poll.

‘Turnout’ across the participating schools was 72% – higher than the 67% figure for the real general election, and representing over 30,000 young people casting their vote.

The results differed markedly from the real general election outcome:

  • Labour emerged as the clear winner, with a 33.9% vote share.
  • The Liberal Democrats came second, with 20.5%.
  • The Conservatives were third, with 18.7%.
  • The Green Party was fourth, with 15.6%.

(The figures in this post differ marginally from those we announced on 12 December, owing to a number of schools submitting their results after the deadline for inclusion in the announcement on the evening of the general election.)

Across the participating schools, roughly equal numbers of candidates (between 55 and 59) stood for each of these four leading parties. Thirty-two candidates stood for the Brexit Party, which came fifth with 3.5% of the vote.

In total, over 300 pupils and students stood as candidates.

Forty-nine stood as candidates for made-up parties, as independents, or as candidates for parties falling outside the best-placed five, including the Pirate Party, Plaid Cymru, the SNP, UKIP and the Women’s Equality Party. Of the made-up parties, several evidenced environmental priorities (the Save our World Party, the Exit Plastic Party), and others suggested local school-level concerns (the More Outside and Inside Equipment Party).

#MockElections2019 on social media

In Northumberland, Ponteland High’s Mock Election was covered by ITV News Tyne Tees:

Meanwhile, Seaford College in Sussex made a video of its Mock Election and saw its poll covered in the local press.

Many other participating schools and teachers also shared images of their Mock Elections on social media:

Hansard Society Mock Elections

One of the oldest and largest civic education projects anywhere in the world, Mock Elections has been run by the Hansard Society at every UK general election for over 50 years.

In 2019, the Society again made available a free download of all the resources teachers and pupils needed to run a mock poll.

Research has shown that participating in citizenship-related activities at school, such as mock elections, makes young people more likely to have positive attitudes towards political participation as adults and more likely to engage in political activity. This applies even when controlling for other relevant factors, such as higher levels of formal education.

Several candidates in the real 2019 general election, as well as former MPs and other prominent political figures, participated in mock elections when they were at school and were inspired to go on to Westminster.

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

House of Commons Liaison Committee: public evidence session with the Prime Minister (Copyright: @faisalislam)
publications / briefings / 2020

Who chooses the scrutineer? Why MPs should resist the government’s attempt to determine the Liaison Committee chair

Should the Liaison Committee have as its chair someone who is not simultaneously a select committee chair, and should the identity of that person be determined by the government? The answer to these questions will tell us much about how this cohort of MPs, particularly government backbenchers, view the relationship between Parliament and the executive.

Who chooses the scrutineer? Why MPs should resist the government’s attempt to determine the Liaison Committee chair
Winston Churchill at a BBC microphone about to broadcast to the nation on the afternoon of VE Day, 8 May 1945 (© Crown Copyright: IWM)
blog / 07.05.20

Two days in the Commons Chamber that took Churchill to No.10: the Norway Debate of May 1940

The Coronavirus crisis is spotlighting the importance of the House of Commons Chamber in our democratic life. 7-8 May marks 80 years since the Norway Debate, the event which demonstrated this most famously. Over two days of debate, MPs’ performances in the Chamber and a decision to force a division had historic consequences.

Two days in the Commons Chamber that took Churchill to No.10: the Norway Debate of May 1940
Remote session of the Health and Social Care select committee (CC)
blog / 07.05.20

Remote select committee evidence-taking is a Coronavirus change that should be kept

The extensive take-up of remote evidence-taking by House of Commons select committees during the Easter recess is a significant Coronavirus-induced change of practice. It shows how procedural and technological change can help support scrutiny.

Remote select committee evidence-taking is a Coronavirus change that should be kept
Photo of Acts of Parliament in the Parliamentary Archives, Houses of Parliament, Westminster
blog / 28.04.20

What is the aim of parliamentary scrutiny of delegated legislation?

Several parliamentary committees scrutinise delegated powers and delegated legislation. But what is the aim of this scrutiny, what standards are applied, and what are the value and limits of Parliament’s role in this aspect of the legislative process?

What is the aim of parliamentary scrutiny of delegated legislation?
Prime Minister Boris Johnson addresses the House of Commons during the debate on the Queen's Speech, State Opening of Parliament, 2019 (©UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor).
publications / data / 2020

How long does it take for a new House of Commons to get fully up and running?

There will be gaps in a new House of Commons’ scrutiny of the government and engagement with the public until the events required at the start of a Parliament have taken place and all the necessary institutions and processes have been re-established. The length of time taken over procedures at the start of a Parliament therefore matters.

How long does it take for a new House of Commons to get fully up and running?
A sparsely attended debate on the Coronavirus Bill in the House of Commons on 23 March 2020 as social distancing rules are implemented in the Chamber and the public and press galleries. (Copyright: @UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor. Reproduced with the permission of Parliament.)
publications / 2020

Proposals for a ‘virtual’ Parliament: how should parliamentary procedure and practices adapt during the Coronavirus pandemic?

There have been many calls for Parliament to become ‘virtual’ during the Coronavirus pandemic, using remote working to ensure proper scrutiny of government during the crisis. But how should a ‘virtual’ Parliament operate?

Proposals for a ‘virtual’ Parliament: how should parliamentary procedure and practices adapt during the Coronavirus pandemic?
Prev
Next