The Danish Nobel prize winning physicist Nils Bohr observed that prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. He wasn’t thinking about the 2015 general election when he said this, but he might as well have been.

The Rochester and Strood by-election makes things more uncertain. It might get us thrown out of the ‘political science’ club, but here are 5 things that Mark Reckless’ win shows that we don’t know about the May 2015 general election.

  1. We still think of politics as a left versus right clash, but is 2015 going to be an ‘up-down’ election: the people against a political class that they see as failed and out of touch?

  • If Labour is up then surely the Conservatives are down, and vice versa? But the day after Rochester and Strood both Labour and the Conservatives are down. Is zero sum politics dead and buried?

  • Can UKIP break the mould? They just won what experts listed as their 271st most winnable seat. Perhaps, as Nigel Farage said, all bets are off? Will support continue to drain from the mainstream parties to their smaller rivals like UKIP and the Greens? If it does, the dynamics of elections and coalition politics are transformed.

  • Can things get worse for the Liberal Democrats? This question has been asked for the last four years and the answer has tended to be yes. How much lower can they go? In Rochester and Strood they were polling at 1%, with the margin of error this could put them at -2%, which is truly unexplored territory.

  • Social media was seen as a way for politicians to connect with the electorate and for democratic debate to be widened and energised. Emily Thornberry didn’t get that memo.

These are all things that we don’t know about the 2015 general election. Keep checking this blog for even more.

Image Courtesy: Wikimedia, Licensed under the Creative Commons

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

Sunset over Big Ben, Houses of Parliament, Westminster
blog / 11.06.19

Waiting for who? House of Commons business before the summer recess

The focus is on what might happen at the end of the pre-summer Commons sitting period now underway – rightly, given its potential political and constitutional significance. But the dearth of government legislative business means the six weeks before then could present opportunities for the opposition, backbenchers and select committees, including on Brexit.

Waiting for who? House of Commons business before the summer recess
UK and EU flags superimposed on top of the Houses of Parliament.
publications / briefings / 2019

‘Retained EU law’: issues for the Withdrawal Agreement Bill

Coming on top of the controversial introduction of the concept of ‘retained EU law’ in the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018, the provisions for an implementation / transition period in the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement pose challenges for UK law that the promised Withdrawal Agreement Bill will need to address, including through amendments to the 2018 Act.

‘Retained EU law’: issues for the Withdrawal Agreement Bill
Social media icons
blog / 17.05.19

People who use social media for politics skew Labour and Remain, but Leave is winning the Twitter war

Data from the 2019 Audit of Political Engagement and Twitter show that, among people who use social media for politics, Labour is over-represented relative to Conservatives, and Remainers relative to Leavers – but, in the European elections run-up, content from the Brexit Party is shared more than content from the ‘Remain’ parties combined.

People who use social media for politics skew Labour and Remain, but Leave is winning the Twitter war
Big Ben, Houses of Parliament, in scaffolding
blog / 13.05.19

The Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill: Two steps forward, one step back?

The long-delayed rebuilding of the Palace of Westminster has taken two large steps forward with the publication of key legislation and a public consultation on plans for the House of Commons’ temporary accommodation. However, concerns and confusion remain around the roles of both the government and the public in the R&R programme.

The Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill: Two steps forward, one step back?
Houses of Parliament, Westminster, UK
publications / submissions / 2019

Evidence to the House of Commons Liaison Committee: The effectiveness and influence of the select committee system

In our April 2019 submission to the House of Commons Liaison Committee inquiry into the select committee system, we made wide-ranging recommendations including a review of the select committee core tasks, and a restructuring of the system to provide for improved scrutiny of delegated legislation and legislative standards and to accommodate post-Brexit needs.

Evidence to the House of Commons Liaison Committee: The effectiveness and influence of the select committee system
Prev
Next