The Danish Nobel prize winning physicist Nils Bohr observed that prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. He wasn’t thinking about the 2015 general election when he said this, but he might as well have been.

The Rochester and Strood by-election makes things more uncertain. It might get us thrown out of the ‘political science’ club, but here are 5 things that Mark Reckless’ win shows that we don’t know about the May 2015 general election.

  1. We still think of politics as a left versus right clash, but is 2015 going to be an ‘up-down’ election: the people against a political class that they see as failed and out of touch?

  • If Labour is up then surely the Conservatives are down, and vice versa? But the day after Rochester and Strood both Labour and the Conservatives are down. Is zero sum politics dead and buried?

  • Can UKIP break the mould? They just won what experts listed as their 271st most winnable seat. Perhaps, as Nigel Farage said, all bets are off? Will support continue to drain from the mainstream parties to their smaller rivals like UKIP and the Greens? If it does, the dynamics of elections and coalition politics are transformed.

  • Can things get worse for the Liberal Democrats? This question has been asked for the last four years and the answer has tended to be yes. How much lower can they go? In Rochester and Strood they were polling at 1%, with the margin of error this could put them at -2%, which is truly unexplored territory.

  • Social media was seen as a way for politicians to connect with the electorate and for democratic debate to be widened and energised. Emily Thornberry didn’t get that memo.

These are all things that we don’t know about the 2015 general election. Keep checking this blog for even more.

Image Courtesy: Wikimedia, Licensed under the Creative Commons

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

A large crowd
blog / 15.04.19

Finding of support for a ‘strong leader’ helps provoke responses to 2019 Audit of Political Engagement

This post rounds up the wide range of responses to our 2019 Audit of Political Engagement made in the first week after its publication. The post focuses on several commentators who offered considered rather than purely alarmist responses to the Audit’s finding of majority support for a ‘strong leader willing to break the rules’.

Finding of support for a ‘strong leader’ helps provoke responses to 2019 Audit of Political Engagement
Photo of a stack of Evening Standard newspapers
media / coverage

The public think politics is broken, and are willing to entertain radical solutions

The latest annual Audit of Political Engagement shows opinions of the system of governing are at their lowest point in 15 years - worse now than in the aftermath of the MPs’ expenses scandal. The public are pessimistic about the country’s problems and their solution, with sizeable numbers willing to entertain radical political changes as a result.

The public think politics is broken, and are willing to entertain radical solutions
People walking over Westminster Bridge towards the Palace of Westminster, Houses of Parliament
publications / reports / 2019

Audit of Political Engagement 16

Find out what the public thinks about politics, politicians, political parties, the system of governing, and more in our latest Audit of Political Engagement.

Audit of Political Engagement 16
Prev
Next