The Danish Nobel prize winning physicist Nils Bohr observed that prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. He wasn’t thinking about the 2015 general election when he said this, but he might as well have been.

The Rochester and Strood by-election makes things more uncertain. It might get us thrown out of the ‘political science’ club, but here are 5 things that Mark Reckless’ win shows that we don’t know about the May 2015 general election.

  1. We still think of politics as a left versus right clash, but is 2015 going to be an ‘up-down’ election: the people against a political class that they see as failed and out of touch?

  • If Labour is up then surely the Conservatives are down, and vice versa? But the day after Rochester and Strood both Labour and the Conservatives are down. Is zero sum politics dead and buried?

  • Can UKIP break the mould? They just won what experts listed as their 271st most winnable seat. Perhaps, as Nigel Farage said, all bets are off? Will support continue to drain from the mainstream parties to their smaller rivals like UKIP and the Greens? If it does, the dynamics of elections and coalition politics are transformed.

  • Can things get worse for the Liberal Democrats? This question has been asked for the last four years and the answer has tended to be yes. How much lower can they go? In Rochester and Strood they were polling at 1%, with the margin of error this could put them at -2%, which is truly unexplored territory.

  • Social media was seen as a way for politicians to connect with the electorate and for democratic debate to be widened and energised. Emily Thornberry didn’t get that memo.

These are all things that we don’t know about the 2015 general election. Keep checking this blog for even more.

Image Courtesy: Wikimedia, Licensed under the Creative Commons

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

Liz Truss, UK Government Foreign Secretary
blog / 21.01.22

Back to the future? House of Commons scrutiny of EU affairs after Lord Frost’s exit

The recent rearrangement of responsibilities for the government’s handling of EU-related affairs raises questions about future parliamentary scrutiny of these issues. In some respects pre-2016 institutional arrangements are restored, but the post-Brexit landscape presents new scrutiny challenges which thus far MPs have not confronted.

Back to the future? House of Commons scrutiny of EU affairs after Lord Frost’s exit
Palace of Westminster, Houses of Parliament, at dusk
blog / 14.01.22

Living on a prayer (motion): How do parliamentarians debate ‘made negative’ Statutory Instruments?

A recent House of Lords debate on a ‘made negative’ Statutory Instrument highlights Peers’ greater appetite and ability to secure such debates compared to MPs. Data on debate lengths suggests parliamentarians are more likely to give more meaningful scrutiny to SIs they wish to debate than those on which they are obliged to spend time by current procedures.

Living on a prayer (motion): How do parliamentarians debate ‘made negative’ Statutory Instruments?
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, the Rt Hon Sajid Javid MP, making a statement to the House of Commons updating Members on Covid-19, 8 December 2021 (©) House of Commons / Jessica Taylor
publications / briefings / 2021

What Covid Regulations might MPs be asked to debate on 14 December and how will the Regulations be approved?

What Covid Regulations will the House of Commons debate on 14 December, and how? Amid backbench unrest, the occasion will be shaped by the interplay between delegated legislation scrutiny, parliamentary procedures, and raw politics. The outcome could have profound consequences for both public health policy and the Prime Minister’s position.

What Covid Regulations might MPs be asked to debate on 14 December and how will the Regulations be approved?
Photo of an HGV
blog / 03.12.21

In it for the long haul: HGV driver shortage Statutory Instruments show scrutiny system shortcomings

Statutory Instruments (SIs) have been a key tool in the government’s response to shortages of heavy goods vehicle (HGV) drivers. These SIs showcase the usefulness of this type of law-making but also highlight again some of the longstanding problems with its parliamentary scrutiny.

In it for the long haul: HGV driver shortage Statutory Instruments show scrutiny system shortcomings
Prev
Next