• Our work

      Themes

    • Brexit and Parliament
    • Future Parliament
    • Governance of Parliament
    • Making better law
    • Parliaments around the world
    • Parliamentary scrutiny
    • Political engagement
    • Representation
    • publications

    • Publications Home
    • Procedural and constitutional guides
    • Briefings
    • Reports
    • Submissions
    • projects

    • Audit of Political Engagement
    • Mock Elections 2019
    • services

    • Statutory Instrument Tracker
  • About

      about

      who we are

    • What we do
    • Our history
    • contact

    • Our people
    • Contact us
    • careers

    • Jobs
    • subscribe

    • Insight Notes newsletter
    • Hansard Society newsletter
  • Blog
  • Media
  • Events
  • Journal
  • Scholars
Hansard Society logoHansard Society logo
  • Our work

    • Themes

      • Brexit and Parliament
      • Future Parliament
      • Governance of Parliament
      • Making better law
      • Parliaments around the world
      • Parliamentary scrutiny
      • Political engagement
      • Representation
    • publications

      • Publications Home
      • Procedural and constitutional guides
      • Briefings
      • Reports
      • Submissions

      projects

      • Audit of Political Engagement
      • Mock Elections 2019

      services

      • Statutory Instrument Tracker
  • About

    • about

        who we are

      • What we do
      • Our history
      • contact

      • Our people
      • Contact us
      • careers

      • Jobs
      • subscribe

      • Insight Notes newsletter
      • Hansard Society newsletter
      • Join our newsletter

        Get the latest updates on our research and events, together with expert comment and analysis, delivered to your inbox each month.

        You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy here.

        Thank you!

        You have been successfully added to our newsletter list.

        Follow us

        :( Oops! Something went wrong...

        Please reload the page and try again.

        Insight Notes

        Subscribe to our regular Insight Notes on parliamentary data, procedures and the legislative process at Westminster, including updates on Brexit Statutory Instruments - in your inbox every sitting Monday afternoon.

        You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy here.

        Thank you!

        You have been successfully added to our Insight Notes email list.

        Follow us

        :( Oops! Something went wrong...

        Please reload the page and try again.

      Follow us

  • Blog

    Blog

    • blog

      • Despatch Box Blog
  • Media

    Media

    • media

      • Contacts for the media
  • Events

    Events

    • events

      • Events
  • Journal

    Journal

    • journal

      • Parliamentary Affairs
  • Scholars

    Scholars

    Protesters marching against anti-abortion laws in Dublin, Ireland
    blog / 24.05.18

    Bridging representative and direct democracy? Ireland's Citizens' Assemblies

    Share this

    How did Ireland get to its 25 May ‘repeal the 8th’ constitutional referendum on abortion? The process has innovatively blended participatory, deliberative, representative and direct forms of democracy.

    Profile photo of Dr Clodagh Harris

    Dr Clodagh Harris

    Senior Lecturer, Department of Government and Politics, University College Cork

    Dr Clodagh Harris

    Dr Clodagh Harris is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Government and Politics, University College Cork. Her research interests include deliberative and participatory democracy, democratic innovations, and citizen engagement. She has made expert contributions to deliberative processes on political reform nationally and internationally and was a member of the Irish Constitutional Convention’s Academic and Legal Advisory Group (2012-14)

    On 25 May, the people of Ireland will go to the polls to vote in a constitutional referendum on whether or not to repeal the 8th amendment to the Irish Constitution. Inserted in 1983 following a referendum, this amendment (Art. 40.3.3) - which “… acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right” - is the cornerstone of Ireland’s restrictive abortion laws and has proven hugely controversial.

    The 25 May referendum is significant for a couple of reasons. Most importantly, it is the first time in a generation that Irish citizens will have the opportunity to vote on whether or not they wish to retain a constitutional provision that has had grave implications for women’s rights as recognised by international rights organisations.

    Secondly, the political process that led to this national referendum has innovatively involved a complementary blend of participatory, deliberative, representative and direct forms of democracy.

    This is the second time, almost in as many years, that a recommendation from a government-established deliberative mini-public has been put to the Irish people in a referendum. The first was in May 2015, when the constitutional referendum on Marriage Equality was successful. That was historic globally, as it was the first successful national referendum on the issue; and it was also the first time that a citizens’ assembly recommendation passed a national plebiscite.

    “The political process that led to the 25 May referendum has involved a complementary blend of participatory, deliberative, representative and direct forms of democracy”

    The 2015 referendum was in response to a recommendation from the Irish Constitutional Convention (2012-14), established by the then Irish government in response to calls for wider constitutional and political reform. The Convention included 66 randomly selected citizens (broadly reflective of wider Irish society in terms of sex, age, geography, education and socio-economic status), 33 political representatives (drawn from parties across the island of Ireland) and an independent chair. It was tasked with deliberating on a somewhat eclectic array of issues ranging from marriage equality to reducing the voting age and from electoral system reform to the removal of the offence of blasphemy from the Constitution. Described as a deliberative mini-public, its work included public submissions, brief accessible ‘expert’ presentations, ‘stake-holder’ panel discussions, personal testimonies and facilitated small group discussions. Its recommendations were determined by a majority of the votes of members present and voting.

    One of its successes has been carving out a role for deliberative democratic innovations in the Irish political system, and its legacy is evident in the subsequent Irish Citizens’ Assembly (2016-18), the recommendations of which on the 8th amendment have led to the 25 May referendum.

    “One of the Convention’s successes has been carving out a role for deliberative democratic innovations in the Irish political system”

    Established by parliamentary resolution in July 2016, the Citizens’ Assembly comprised 99 citizens (recruited by a polling company using stratified random sampling across four targets, namely sex, age, geography and social class) and an independent chair. Notwithstanding some differences in terms of composition (the Assembly did not include political representatives), the Assembly modelled its work closely on that of the Convention. It too was asked to examine a diverse range of key issues, including abortion (the 8th amendment), climate change and fixed-term parliaments, to name but a few.

    The 8th amendment was the first issue the Assembly discussed, and the one that occupied most of its time. Considering the pressure coming from international rights organisations (such as the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women), national civil society organisations, a growing grass-roots movement for repeal and the political sensitivity of the issue, it was unsurprising that the Assembly was asked to report on it. The Assembly concluded that Art. 40.3.3 should be removed and replaced with a Constitutional provision explicitly authorising the Oireachtas (Irish Parliament) to address termination of pregnancy, any rights of the unborn and any rights of the pregnant woman. It also made recommendations on what should be included in this legislation.

    The Assembly’s final report on the issue was, in accordance with the Assembly’s terms of reference, submitted to the Houses of the Oireachtas and referred for consideration to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on the 8th amendment. This Committee reviewed the Assembly’s recommendations and published its report at the end of 2017. It agreed with the Assembly’s findings that the 8th amendment needed to be removed. However, in recommending a ‘repeal simplicter’ (that is, a single repeal without the introduction of any replacement or amendment text), it differed from the Assembly. (Three members of the committee, all of whom oppose abortion, did not sign off on the report, as they did not agree with its findings, and instead published a minority report in which they criticised the work of the committee, its processes and focus.) The Joint Committee’s report was debated in the Houses of the Oireachtas in January 2018 and was followed shortly afterwards by the 8th amendment referendum bill, which reflects the Citizens’ Assembly proposal to repeal and replace the amendment.

    “The Irish Assemblies have shown that deliberative mini-publics can make a difference”

    In placing citizens at the heart of the decision-making process, deliberative mini-publics such as citizens’ assemblies have much to commend them, and recent decades have witnessed significant growth in their use worldwide.

    Traditionally, their greatest challenge has been realising output legitimacy - that is, achieving impact in terms of contributing to wider public discourses, effecting policy and/or constitutional change, reforming political processes, etc. The Irish Assemblies have bucked this trend by showing that deliberative mini-publics can make a difference in terms of constitutional change and political processes (although, in the case of the Irish Convention, for example, a number of government commitments made in response to its reports have yet to be realised). The Irish examples also highlight how deliberative mini-publics can successfully complement representative and direct forms of democracy in ways that overcome the shortcomings of each model, although it would be incorrect to present them as a panacea for all that ails modern democracies. Finally, they prove that mini-publics can deliberate even on so-called emotive topics. It remains to be seen, however, whether they will become a more formal, regular feature of the Irish political institutional landscape.


    Image attribution: March for Choice in Dublin, by William Murphy (CC BY-SA 2.0)


    Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

    Related

     Select committee panel (blurred)
    blog / journal / 08.11.19

    Select Committee development and reform: turning points over 40 years

    Theresa May, Liaison Committee session, House of Commons
    blog / journal / 23.09.19

    The 2019 Liaison Committee report on the Commons select committee system: broadening the church, integrating with the Chamber

    blog / 18.09.19

    The Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Act 2019: What next?

    Erskine May online
    blog / 04.07.19

    Freeing 'Erskine May': getting the authoritative guide to Parliament's procedures and practice online

    Woman casting a vote in a polling station
    blog / 24.06.19

    The Brecon and Radnorshire recall petition process: personal reflections by Sir Paul Silk

    Cover image for the Parliamentary Affairs journal
    journal

    Parliamentary Affairs: special issue on '40 years of departmental select committees in the House of Commons' (vol 72, issue 4, 2019)

    Cover image for the Parliamentary Affairs journal
    journal

    Parliamentary Affairs (vol 72, issue 3, 2019)

    The House of Commons debating the Withdrawal Agreement during the Saturday-sitting on 19 October, 2019
    media / coverage

    Even with a majority, getting Brexit done on deadline will be no mean feat

    Photo of a stack of Evening Standard newspapers
    media / coverage

    The public think politics is broken, and are willing to entertain radical solutions

    School pupils in an assembly with their hands up.
    projects

    Mock Elections 2019

    People walking over Westminster Bridge towards the Palace of Westminster, Houses of Parliament
    projects

    Audit of Political Engagement

    Cover image for House of Commons Liaison Committee evidence, 25 April, 2019
    publica… / submissions / 2019

    Evidence to the House of Commons Liaison Committee: The effectiveness and influence of the select committee system

    People walking over Westminster Bridge towards the Palace of Westminster, Houses of Parliament
    publica… / reports / 2019

    Audit of Political Engagement 16

    Join our newsletter

    Get the latest updates on our research and events, together with expert comment and analysis, delivered to your inbox each month.

    You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy here.

    Thank you!

    You have been successfully added to our newsletter list.

    Follow us

    :( Oops! Something went wrong...

    Please reload the page and try again.

    Top three

    The Queen's Speech during the State Opening of Parliament, October 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publica… / guides / 2019

    Back to Business: procedure at the start of a new Parliament (special collection)

    School pupils in an assembly with their hands up.
    projects

    Mock Elections 2019

    Boris Johnson's statement to the House of Commons on 19 October, 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publications / guides

    Procedural and constitutional guides

    Latest

    The Queen's Speech during the State Opening of Parliament, October 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Back to Business: procedure at the start of a new Parliament (special collection)

    At the start of a new Parliament a series of ceremonies and procedures must take place before the Members of the two Houses can get down to business. Our special collection of procedural guides takes you through them. We start with some things to look out for at the highly unusul start of the 2019 Parliament on 17 December.

    Back to Business: procedure at the start of a new Parliament (special collection)
    A House of Commons Clerk holds out the Affirmation for a newly elected Member of Parliament to read (2010), © UK Parliament/Catherine Bebbington (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Lifecycle of a Parliament

    A set of laws, conventions and Standing Orders govern how and when a Parliament starts and ends, how it is divided into sessions and sitting periods, and what ceremonies and procedures take place at different points. This guide takes you through them.

    Lifecycle of a Parliament
    The Royal Procession during the State Opening of Parliament, October 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Queen’s Speech and State Opening of Parliament

    State Opening, with the Queen’s Speech at its centre, is the key ceremonial and constitutional event at the start of a new session of Parliament.

    Queen’s Speech and State Opening of Parliament
    Saturday sitting in the House of Commons to debate the renegotiated Brexit deal (19 Oct. 2019), © UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor/Stephen Pike (CC BY-NC 2.0).
    publications / guides / 2019

    Leadership and Governance

    A number of different individuals and bodies provide leadership in each House. They have important powers and responsibilities, ranging from the administration of each House to stewardship of parliamentary business and procedures. This guide takes you through them.

    Leadership and Governance
    Former Foreign Secretary Lord Hague, his former Special Advisor Baroness Helic and UN Special Envoy Angelina Jolie give evidence to a House of Lords select committee, © UK House of Lords/Helen Jones (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Select Committees

    Select committees are one of the key ways the two Houses of Parliament hold the government to account. They are also important bodies for Parliament’s engagement with the public.

    Select Committees
    House of Commons debate, © UK Parliament/Jess Taylor (CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Private Members’ Bills

    Private Members’ Bills are bills introduced by MPs and Peers who are not government ministers. They provide backbenchers with an opportunity to address public concerns and to set a policy agenda that is not determined by the executive. But the procedures, often a source of controversy, are different to those that apply for government bills.

    Private Members’ Bills
    Prev
    Next
    • Recent pages
      • Bridging representative and direct democracy? Ireland's Citizens' Assembliesblog
    • Home
    • Contact us
    • What we do
    • Jobs
    • Privacy policy
    • Site map

    Join our newsletter

    Get the latest updates on our research and events, together with expert comment and analysis, delivered to your inbox each month.

    You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy here.

    Thank you!

    You have been successfully added to our newsletter list.

    Follow us

    :( Oops! Something went wrong...

    Please reload the page and try again.

    Copyright © 2019 Hansard Society • Charity No: 1091364 • Registration No: 4332105.