Lifting the Lid: The Welfare Reform (Northern Ireland) Order 2015
Share this
Our ‘Lifting the Lid’ blog series aims to open up the delegated legislation process by revealing the stories behind some recently published Statutory Instruments. This week: The Welfare Reform (Northern Ireland) Order 2015.
This week both Houses will consider the Welfare Reform (Northern Ireland) Order 2015. One of the longest and most extensive pieces of delegated legislation published in recent times, the process by which it will be considered in Parliament highlights key concerns about the weaknesses in the scrutiny process, the important role of the House of Lords (possibly under threat as a result of the Strathclyde review) compared to the Commons, and how difficult it is to effectively hold governments to account in a fragile and fractious political environment.
The Order in Council is a result of the Northern Ireland (Welfare Reform) Bill, a piece of enabling legislation arising from the inability of the Northern Ireland Assembly to implement the UK government’s welfare reform programme.
While welfare is a devolved issue in Northern Ireland, there has been an agreed principle that welfare policy in Northern Ireland would broadly mirror the policy in place in the rest of Great Britain. In October 2012, the Northern Ireland administration introduced a Welfare Reform Bill to implement the Westminster government’s Welfare Reform Act 2012, but three years after its introduction in the Northern Ireland Assembly the Bill stalled in committee and ultimately fell at its final stage in May this year.
Amidst growing political instability, an agreement was reached in November between the Northern Ireland Executive, the Northern Ireland Assembly and the UK Government to allow Westminster to legislate for welfare in Northern Ireland.
The Northern Ireland (Welfare Reform) Bill was introduced on 19 November and was “fast tracked” through both Houses of Parliament in just two days. The Bill contained just three clauses, with the most significant clause a delegated power conferred on the Secretary of State to legislate for the delivery of welfare reform in Northern Ireland by way of an Order in Council - the Welfare Reform (Northern Ireland) Order 2015.
This Order was laid in Parliament on 26 November, one day after the Northern Ireland (Welfare Reform) Bill received Royal Assent and it will be considered by both MPs and Peers today and Thursday respectively. The Order is 132 pages long and makes provision equivalent to the Welfare Reform Act 2012 implementing the reforms and the amendments agreed during the passage of the Assembly Welfare Reform Bill. It also allows for Northern Ireland Executive-funded top-ups and various flexibilities not contained in the original Westminster Act but agreed between the Northern Ireland Department for Social Development and the Department for Work and Pensions.
In its Delegated Powers Memorandum the government argued that it was “essential” that the Bill was passed on an emergency basis in order to facilitate the “quickest possible implementation of welfare reform in Northern Ireland.” The Memorandum also argues that there is “insufficient parliamentary time” to take all of the detailed provisions through Parliament as primary legislation. In response, the House of Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee recognised the “pressing political need for speedy enactment of the Bill” but was critical of its “unfortunate consequences for proper scrutiny” stating that “relegating” so much provision to an Order would “allow for only very limited discussion of its text”.
Although a draft of the Order was published alongside the Bill last week, MPs have not been given long to consider all 132 pages of the Statutory Instrument (SI) and as with all other affirmative instruments they will only have up to one and a half hours to debate its contents. Furthermore Tuesday’s debate will be taking place before the Joint Committee of Statutory Instruments (JCSI) has considered the technical aspects of the instrument, such as whether or not it contains any drafting errors or defects (we would expect the JCSI to report on the Order before Thursday given that House of Lords Standing Order 73 states that an approval motion may not be laid in the Lords until the JCSI has reported on the instrument).
The lack of available time for proper parliamentary scrutiny of the provisions is a genuine concern, but the most controversial aspect of the Welfare Reform (Northern Ireland) Order 2015 relates to its provision of ‘sub-delegated legislation’, whereby an instrument itself confers power on a minister to make further Statutory Instruments.
In its report on the Northern Ireland (Welfare Reform) Bill, the Delegated Powers Committee expressed concern over the “numerous and extensive” sub-delegated powers contained within the Order, particularly in relation to the powers allowing ministers to amend Acts of Parliament by instrument (known as Henry VIII powers). The committee criticised the Delegated Powers Memorandum for failing to even mention this sub-delegation of powers and made clear that it expected powers “of this significance” to be included on the face of the Bill.
The committee heavily criticised the fact that whilst the provisions within the Bill were time-limited, the sub-delegated powers contained within the Order were not. Furthermore the committee expressed its surprise that the sub-delegated powers would only be subject to the negative procedure when the equivalent powers within the Northern Ireland Assembly Bill were subject to the affirmative procedure.
With no opportunity to amend the Order, both Houses are left with the rather unpalatable choice of either accepting an Order containing provisions that a parliamentary scrutiny committee has labelled “extremely unsatisfactory”, or reject it and risk destabilising a very fragile political settlement.
Want to know more about delegated legislation? This 5 minute video with our Director, Dr Ruth Fox, explains what it is and why it needs reforming.
Our research into delegated legislation was funded by the Nuffield Foundation.
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
Latest
blog / 13.11.20
Controverted elections: how disputed results used to be part and parcel of English political and parliamentary life
Disputed parliamentary election results – often taking months to resolve - were a frequent feature of English political culture before the reforms of the 19th century. But how could defeated candidates protest the result of an election, and how were such disputes resolved?
Did you get the memo? Post-legislative scrutiny and the case of judicial review
The government has established an independent review of judicial review – but post-legislative scrutiny has not yet been conducted on the previous reform of the system, in the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. This is typical of the low priority given to post-legislative scrutiny by both government and Parliament.
Building on the ‘Brady amendment’: how can Parliament scrutinise Coronavirus regulations more effectively?
A large body of Coronavirus-related Statutory Instruments have been subject to limited parliamentary scrutiny. Amid growing concern that Parliament is being sidelined by ministers, this briefing explores the procedural obstacles to effective scrutiny of the Covid-19 regulations, and how these might be addressed
Politics in Autumn 2020 will continue to be dominated by Coronavirus and the negotiations with the EU, as the end of the post-Brexit transition period approaches on 31 December. But what will this mean for parliamentary business in the coming months, and what scope will there be to tackle other issues? We pick 15 things to look out for.
How is the Petitions Committee representing the public amid the procedural and practical restrictions of the Covid crisis?
Catherine McKinnell MP, Chair of the House of Commons Petitions Committee, sets out how the Covid-19 crisis has significantly increased the public’s use of e-petitions while limiting the House’s ability to debate them. This has prompted the Committee to innovate, to ensure that petitioners’ voices are heard during the crisis.
Demands to recall the House of Commons over this summer’s exams fiasco reinforce the case for taking the process out of government hands
In a crisis the House of Commons is hamstrung if it is in recess, for MPs are not masters of their own House. While any MP can make representations to the government and the House of Commons Speaker to request a recall, under Standing Orders only a formal request from ministers to the Speaker can actually trigger one.
