• Our work

      Themes

    • Brexit and Parliament
    • Future Parliament
    • Governance of Parliament
    • Making better law
    • Parliaments around the world
    • Parliamentary scrutiny
    • Political engagement
    • Representation
    • publications

    • Publications Home
    • Procedural and constitutional guides
    • Briefings
    • Reports
    • Submissions
    • projects

    • Audit of Political Engagement
    • Mock Elections 2019
    • services

    • Statutory Instrument Tracker
  • About

      about

      who we are

    • What we do
    • Our history
    • contact

    • Our people
    • Contact us
    • careers

    • Jobs
    • subscribe

    • Insight Notes newsletter
    • Hansard Society newsletter
  • Blog
  • Media
  • Events
  • Journal
  • Scholars
Hansard Society logoHansard Society logo
  • Our work

    • Themes

      • Brexit and Parliament
      • Future Parliament
      • Governance of Parliament
      • Making better law
      • Parliaments around the world
      • Parliamentary scrutiny
      • Political engagement
      • Representation
    • publications

      • Publications Home
      • Procedural and constitutional guides
      • Briefings
      • Reports
      • Submissions

      projects

      • Audit of Political Engagement
      • Mock Elections 2019

      services

      • Statutory Instrument Tracker
  • About

    • about

        who we are

      • What we do
      • Our history
      • contact

      • Our people
      • Contact us
      • careers

      • Jobs
      • subscribe

      • Insight Notes newsletter
      • Hansard Society newsletter
      • Join our newsletter

        Get the latest updates on our research and events, together with expert comment and analysis, delivered to your inbox each month.

        You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy here.

        Thank you!

        You have been successfully added to our newsletter list.

        Follow us

        :( Oops! Something went wrong...

        Please reload the page and try again.

        Insight Notes

        Subscribe to our regular Insight Notes on parliamentary data, procedures and the legislative process at Westminster, including updates on Brexit Statutory Instruments - in your inbox every sitting Monday afternoon.

        You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy here.

        Thank you!

        You have been successfully added to our Insight Notes email list.

        Follow us

        :( Oops! Something went wrong...

        Please reload the page and try again.

      Follow us

  • Blog

    Blog

    • blog

      • Despatch Box Blog
  • Media

    Media

    • media

      • Contacts for the media
  • Events

    Events

    • events

      • Events
  • Journal

    Journal

    • journal

      • Parliamentary Affairs
  • Scholars

    Scholars

    Social media icons
    blog / 17.05.19

    People who use social media for politics skew Labour and Remain, but Leave is winning the Twitter war

    Share this

    Data from the 2019 Audit of Political Engagement and Twitter show that, among people who use social media for politics, Labour is over-represented relative to Conservatives, and Remainers relative to Leavers – but, in the European elections run-up, content from the Brexit Party is shared more than content from the ‘Remain’ parties combined.

    Lawrence McKay

    Lawrence McKay

    ESRC CASE PhD Studentship, University of Manchester/Hansard Society

    Lawrence McKay

    Lawrence is a PhD student at the University of Manchester. His research focuses on the representation gap, looking at local influences on public perceptions of politics and politicians, and making use in particular of the British Election Study dataset. His work is co-supervised by Professor Edward Fieldhouse and Professor Maria Sobolewska.

    Lawrence is an ESRC CASE scholar and his PhD is partly supported by the Hansard Society, with which he collaborates to develop the impact of his research.

    Lawrence was previously a student at the University of Exeter, completing a BA in History and an MRes in Politics.

    Oliver Beatson

    PhD student, University of Manchester and ESRC-funded Centre for Doctoral Training: Data Analytics and Society

    Oliver Beatson

    Oliver Beatson is a PhD student at the University of Manchester and part of the ESRC-funded Centre for Doctoral Training: Data Analytics and Society. His research focuses on the effects of increased social media usage on political engagement. He is supervised by Professor Rachel Gibson and Dr Marta Cantijoch Cunill. Oliver previously completed a BA in Politics at Sheffield Hallam University and a MSc in Politics with Research Methods at the University of Sheffield.

    In recent years social media, particularly Twitter, has become an integral part of the way in which UK politics is both presented and consumed. Most MPs and political journalists have a Twitter account and regularly use it to engage with each other and the public – sometimes productively, but sometimes receiving abuse and intimidation. Meanwhile, political television shows promote their own hashtags, such as #BBCQT, driving engagement and debate during election campaigns. Tweets are also regularly used as the basis for a news story, talk show segment, or to represent public opinion.

    Social media is, then, increasingly central. It is often assumed that it is younger, liberal and left-wing people who dominate, but more recently we have seen that politicians and activists on the right can also build up a substantial following and influence the debate. So who exactly are the people engaging online? How successful are the parties’ Twitter accounts in engaging people? And, heading towards the European Parliament elections on 23 May, is it ‘Remain’ or ‘Leave’ parties that are winning out?

    What we know

    Studies internationally show that politically vocal Twitter users are generally not representative: for instance, they often lean left in their attitudes. In the UK, studies show that users of social media overall – not just for politics – skew left in their attitudes and party support. Twitter users in particular lean heavily towards Labour, with Conservative voters being outnumbered 2 to 1 by Labour voters as of 2017. Research on the 2017 election suggests that Labour supporters may engage more, as hashtags relating to Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party won the Twitter battle.

    Yet, though we know that social media in the UK is unrepresentative, we don’t know the make-up of people who use social media for politics specifically. We also know little about how the important political divide which has surfaced over Brexit has manifested online.

    Who is engaging online?

    In the Hansard Society Audit of Political Engagement 15, published in 2018, the survey introduced a battery of questions about online engagement, asking what people had done in the last 12 months. This was expanded in the 2019 Audit (Audit 16, APE16). In this post, we look at eight activities relating to social media engagement, shown in the table below.

    Table 1: Social media political engagement

    In the last 12 months have you done any of the following?

    Table showing public's social media activity
    Source: Hansard Society Audit of Political Engagement 16, 2019

    We defined the 30% who did one or more of these activities as ‘social media engagers’. The Audit survey also asked people which party they would vote for in an immediate general election, and how they voted in the 2016 EU referendum. In the following chart, we compare the party support of ‘social media engagers’ against the whole population. (Those undecided about their party choice were reassigned on the basis of the party they were ‘most inclined to support’.)

    Figure 1: Social media engagers by party support

    Political party support chart
    Where the y-axis labels are marked with an asterisk, this means the difference was significant: that the group is over- or under-represented among ‘social media engagers’. The black bars indicate that the true value is 95% certain to fall within the upper and lower end. APE16 data was collected before the formation of the Brexit Party and Change UK. Source: Hansard Society Audit of Political Engagement 16, 2019

    As we’d expect from earlier analysis, Labour are over-represented among ‘social media engagers’. The Liberal Democrats are also notably over-represented, although their presence is only strong in relative, not absolute terms; the same pattern is clear for the SNP. The under-represented are, unsurprisingly, non-voters, but also the undecided: political social media seems to be better at engaging those with existing party support than those in the market for a party.

    However, it is Brexit where we see the most dramatic differences.

    Figure 2: Social media engagers by EU referendum vote

    EU referendum chart
    Where the y-axis labels are marked with an asterisk, this means the difference was significant: that the group is over- or under-represented among ‘social media engagers’. The black bars indicate that the true value is 95% certain to fall within the upper and lower end. Source: Hansard Society Audit of Political Engagement 16, 2019

    Again, non-voters are not engaging, but more important is the Leave-Remain split. Among the general public, Leavers are not greatly outnumbered, with a gap of 11 points to Remainers. Among social media engagers, however, Leavers are outnumbered by nearly 3:1.

    Which parties are winning social media?

    Given the politics of social media engagers, it should be obvious which parties would do better on social media. Among the two main parties, Labour should be outpacing the Conservatives. Meanwhile, we would expect ‘Remain’ parties to garner substantially more engagement than ‘Leave’ parties. We define ‘Remain’ parties as those parties which advocate a second referendum or revocation: the Lib Dems, the Greens, the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Change UK. ‘Leave’ parties, meanwhile, are those which advocate a ‘No Deal’ exit: UKIP and the Brexit Party.

    To test these expectations, we looked at how well parties performed on Twitter, where data is relatively easy to access and where retweets easily measure success. The tweets were collected through the Twitter API from 29 April to 6 May 2019, a period that covered the day of local elections in England, on 2 May, as well as three days before and after.

    There are some limitations to bear in mind:

    • We chose to include only engagement with parties’ own tweets – not material that was retweeted that came from other figures, such as MPs and leaders. (The main reason for this is because UKIP is highly overstated if content from other accounts retweeted by parties is included. UKIP frequently retweeted content from right-wing internet personalities, which adds artificially to the party’s total. For other parties, their relative levels of engagement are similar whether or not retweeted content is counted.)
    • There was no voting in Scotland or Wales at the local elections, so the SNP and Plaid are probably understated.
    • The Green success might relate to climate issues – heavily covered in the media that week – rather than Brexit.
    • Twitter is only one of many platforms that parties use.

    What did we find? First – as expected – Labour is well ahead of the Conservatives in engagement. The sheer size of the gap, however, is more surprising: the Conservatives received one retweet for every 11 achieved by Labour. Yet the story here is not just of Labour’s success. In fact, the Conservatives did the worst of any party we looked at, supporting the concerns of many of their activists that the Tory message is ‘barely being heard’ on social media.

    The results for ‘Remain’ and ‘Leave’ parties were, however, completely counter to expectations. In total, the ‘Leave’ parties received more retweets than the ‘Remain’ parties: a major surprise, given the ‘Remain’ leanings of ‘social media engagers’. This was almost totally driven by the success of the Brexit Party: at over 41,000 retweets, they dwarfed even Labour’s total. This can be seen in the graph below. They also had more individually successful tweets than any of the Remain parties. The new ‘Remain’ party – Change UK – compares poorly. Furthermore, though the private ambition of Change UK is reportedly to replace the Lib Dems, they are not achieving that on Twitter. The Lib Dems, and the Greens, are getting much more engagement.

    Figure 3: Total retweets by party, 29 April-6 May 2019

    chart total-retweets-by-party

    Why might the ‘Leave’ parties be winning the Twitter war? There may be several factors, not all about their actual output on Twitter. Many Remainers may be sticking with Labour, while more Brexit supporters desert the Conservatives. There is a Brexit party but no ‘Remain’ party: not everyone knows the Lib Dem, Green and Change UK positions. Studies suggest that success on Twitter has a lot to do with media coverage: Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage’s success at occupying the spotlight might be paying dividends.

    Yet content might matter, too. Studies show that political tweets with ‘moral-emotional’ language do best: the Brexit Party’s emotive ‘betrayal’ narrative is thus perfectly suited to the platform. Brexit Party tweets also seem to play more on people’s sense of ‘Brexit identity’, often using the word ‘Brexiteer’, whereas ‘Remain’ parties almost never use the word ‘Remainer’. As for Change UK, its Twitter account is simply hard to find, as the first Twitter account returned by a Google search for ‘Change UK’ is that of the completely separate campaign organisation ‘Change.org’, and Change UK’s Twitter handle was recently tweaked, leaving the vacated handle to be hijacked by Brexiteers.

    Conclusion

    From the Audit of Political Engagement data, we confirm that those who are politically active on social media are not representative of the wider population. Of the main parties, Labour supporters outnumber Conservatives, which is reflected in Labour’s much greater success on Twitter. But while Remainers vastly outnumber Leavers among ‘social media engagers’, it is the Brexit Party that is winning the Twitter war in the run-up to the European elections. The reasons are likely complex, and though having an accessible and powerful message matters, some of the factors are probably out of the parties’ control. Nevertheless, the implication is that – online as well as offline – the Brexit Party and its supporters will continue to drive debate, even in a country split down the middle.


    Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

    Featured

    People walking over Westminster Bridge towards the Palace of Westminster, Houses of Parliament
    publica… / reports / 2019

    Audit of Political Engagement 16

    Related

     Select committee panel (blurred)
    blog / journal / 08.11.19

    Select Committee development and reform: turning points over 40 years

    Theresa May, Liaison Committee session, House of Commons
    blog / journal / 23.09.19

    The 2019 Liaison Committee report on the Commons select committee system: broadening the church, integrating with the Chamber

    Cover image for the Parliamentary Affairs journal
    journal

    Parliamentary Affairs: special issue on '40 years of departmental select committees in the House of Commons' (vol 72, issue 4, 2019)

    Cover image for the Parliamentary Affairs journal
    journal

    Parliamentary Affairs (vol 72, issue 3, 2019)

    The House of Commons debating the Withdrawal Agreement during the Saturday-sitting on 19 October, 2019
    media / coverage

    Even with a majority, getting Brexit done on deadline will be no mean feat

    Photo of a stack of Evening Standard newspapers
    media / coverage

    The public think politics is broken, and are willing to entertain radical solutions

    School pupils in an assembly with their hands up.
    projects

    Mock Elections 2019

    People walking over Westminster Bridge towards the Palace of Westminster, Houses of Parliament
    projects

    Audit of Political Engagement

    Cover image for House of Commons Liaison Committee evidence, 25 April, 2019
    publica… / submissions / 2019

    Evidence to the House of Commons Liaison Committee: The effectiveness and influence of the select committee system

    Cover image for Lords Liaison Committee evidence, May 2018
    publica… / submissions / 2018

    Evidence to the House of Lords Liaison Committee: Review of investigative and scrutiny committees

    Join our newsletter

    Get the latest updates on our research and events, together with expert comment and analysis, delivered to your inbox each month.

    You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy here.

    Thank you!

    You have been successfully added to our newsletter list.

    Follow us

    :( Oops! Something went wrong...

    Please reload the page and try again.

    Top three

    The Queen's Speech during the State Opening of Parliament, October 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publica… / guides / 2019

    Back to Business: procedure at the start of a new Parliament (special collection)

    School pupils in an assembly with their hands up.
    projects

    Mock Elections 2019

    Boris Johnson's statement to the House of Commons on 19 October, 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publications / guides

    Procedural and constitutional guides

    Latest

    The Queen's Speech during the State Opening of Parliament, October 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Back to Business: procedure at the start of a new Parliament (special collection)

    At the start of a new Parliament a series of ceremonies and procedures must take place before the Members of the two Houses can get down to business. Our special collection of procedural guides takes you through them. We start with some things to look out for at the highly unusul start of the 2019 Parliament on 17 December.

    Back to Business: procedure at the start of a new Parliament (special collection)
    A House of Commons Clerk holds out the Affirmation for a newly elected Member of Parliament to read (2010), © UK Parliament/Catherine Bebbington (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Lifecycle of a Parliament

    A set of laws, conventions and Standing Orders govern how and when a Parliament starts and ends, how it is divided into sessions and sitting periods, and what ceremonies and procedures take place at different points. This guide takes you through them.

    Lifecycle of a Parliament
    The Royal Procession during the State Opening of Parliament, October 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Queen’s Speech and State Opening of Parliament

    State Opening, with the Queen’s Speech at its centre, is the key ceremonial and constitutional event at the start of a new session of Parliament.

    Queen’s Speech and State Opening of Parliament
    Saturday sitting in the House of Commons to debate the renegotiated Brexit deal (19 Oct. 2019), © UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor/Stephen Pike (CC BY-NC 2.0).
    publications / guides / 2019

    Leadership and Governance

    A number of different individuals and bodies provide leadership in each House. They have important powers and responsibilities, ranging from the administration of each House to stewardship of parliamentary business and procedures. This guide takes you through them.

    Leadership and Governance
    Former Foreign Secretary Lord Hague, his former Special Advisor Baroness Helic and UN Special Envoy Angelina Jolie give evidence to a House of Lords select committee, © UK House of Lords/Helen Jones (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Select Committees

    Select committees are one of the key ways the two Houses of Parliament hold the government to account. They are also important bodies for Parliament’s engagement with the public.

    Select Committees
    House of Commons debate, © UK Parliament/Jess Taylor (CC BY-NC 2.0)
    publications / guides / 2019

    Private Members’ Bills

    Private Members’ Bills are bills introduced by MPs and Peers who are not government ministers. They provide backbenchers with an opportunity to address public concerns and to set a policy agenda that is not determined by the executive. But the procedures, often a source of controversy, are different to those that apply for government bills.

    Private Members’ Bills
    Prev
    Next
    • Recent pages
      • People who use social media for politics skew Labour and Remain, but Leave is winning the…blog
    • Home
    • Contact us
    • What we do
    • Jobs
    • Privacy policy
    • Site map

    Join our newsletter

    Get the latest updates on our research and events, together with expert comment and analysis, delivered to your inbox each month.

    You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy here.

    Thank you!

    You have been successfully added to our newsletter list.

    Follow us

    :( Oops! Something went wrong...

    Please reload the page and try again.

    Copyright © 2019 Hansard Society • Charity No: 1091364 • Registration No: 4332105.