From finance to healthcare, technology has transformed the way we live, work and play, with innovative solutions to some of the world’s biggest challenges. Can it also have a role in how we make our laws?
Watch in full
Director of Digital Development, Parliamentary Digital Service and former Head of Web Development, The National Archives.
Principal Researcher in Government Innovation, Nesta and former Head of Research,The Young Foundation.
Stella Creasy MP
Labour & Co-op MP for Walthamstow, Member of the Science and Technology Select Committee.
Dr Ruth Fox
Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society.
Founder and CEO of The Conversational Century and former Government and Politics Specialist, Facebook.
Liam Laurence Smyth
Clerk of Legislation, House of Commons and former Acting Director, Chamber Business, House of Commons.
Head of Research, mySociety, and awarded best paper at the 2016 Conference for eDemocracy and Open Government.
Partnership Lead, Make it Digital, BBC and freelance journalist, commentator and technology critic.
Innovation Director at IT Innovation Centre, University of Southampton.
About the event
The proposed refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster after 2020 presents a rare one in 150 year opportunity for reform of the principal institution of our democracy.
With MPs and Peers due to move out of the Palace into alternative locations in the Westminster area for a few years, could these temporary new Houses be turned into parliamentary laboratories to trial and test new digital technology to support the legislative and scrutiny process?
Recent innovations, for example in relation to data science and social media analysis, potentially offer new opportunities for Parliament to engage with the public, collect and analyse greater amounts of data and reach out to stakeholders beyond the ‘usual suspects’.
But such developments also pose new challenges, not least in relation to privacy and security, training, infrastructure and accessibility. This event will explore the problems in the legislative process – e.g. time, speed, resources, access to expert knowledge, scrutiny capacity – and how new technological developments might help solve them.
Bringing together experts from Parliament and the technology sectors we will explore how Westminster could utilise the rupture of being uprooted from the Palace to drive innovation in the legislative process.
- 2.00pm: Open
- 2.30pm: Session 1 - Capacity, Scrutiny and Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities
- 4.00pm: Break
- 4.30pm: Session 2 - Parliament as an Innovation Lab: Restoration and Renewal… and Beyond
- 6.00pm: Drinks reception
This event forms part of the Hansard Society’s work on Sense4Us, a multi-national technology research project funded by the European Union.
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
Should the Liaison Committee have as its chair someone who is not simultaneously a select committee chair, and should the identity of that person be determined by the government? The answer to these questions will tell us much about how this cohort of MPs, particularly government backbenchers, view the relationship between Parliament and the executive.
The Coronavirus crisis is spotlighting the importance of the House of Commons Chamber in our democratic life. 7-8 May marks 80 years since the Norway Debate, the event which demonstrated this most famously. Over two days of debate, MPs’ performances in the Chamber and a decision to force a division had historic consequences.
The extensive take-up of remote evidence-taking by House of Commons select committees during the Easter recess is a significant Coronavirus-induced change of practice. It shows how procedural and technological change can help support scrutiny.
Several parliamentary committees scrutinise delegated powers and delegated legislation. But what is the aim of this scrutiny, what standards are applied, and what are the value and limits of Parliament’s role in this aspect of the legislative process?
There will be gaps in a new House of Commons’ scrutiny of the government and engagement with the public until the events required at the start of a Parliament have taken place and all the necessary institutions and processes have been re-established. The length of time taken over procedures at the start of a Parliament therefore matters.
There have been many calls for Parliament to become ‘virtual’ during the Coronavirus pandemic, using remote working to ensure proper scrutiny of government during the crisis. But how should a ‘virtual’ Parliament operate?