From finance to healthcare, technology has transformed the way we live, work and play, with innovative solutions to some of the world’s biggest challenges. Can it also have a role in how we make our laws?

Watch in full

Panel one

Panel two

Speakers

Emma Allen
Director of Digital Development, Parliamentary Digital Service and former Head of Web Development, The National Archives.

Victoria Boelman
Principal Researcher in Government Innovation, Nesta and former Head of Research,The Young Foundation.

Stella Creasy MP
Labour & Co-op MP for Walthamstow, Member of the Science and Technology Select Committee.

Dr Ruth Fox
Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society.

Elizabeth Linder
Founder and CEO of The Conversational Century and former Government and Politics Specialist, Facebook.

Liam Laurence Smyth
Clerk of Legislation, House of Commons and former Acting Director, Chamber Business, House of Commons.

Rebecca Rumbul
Head of Research, mySociety, and awarded best paper at the 2016 Conference for eDemocracy and Open Government.

Bill Thompson
Partnership Lead, Make it Digital, BBC and freelance journalist, commentator and technology critic.

Paul Walland
Innovation Director at IT Innovation Centre, University of Southampton.

About the event

The proposed refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster after 2020 presents a rare one in 150 year opportunity for reform of the principal institution of our democracy.

With MPs and Peers due to move out of the Palace into alternative locations in the Westminster area for a few years, could these temporary new Houses be turned into parliamentary laboratories to trial and test new digital technology to support the legislative and scrutiny process?

Recent innovations, for example in relation to data science and social media analysis, potentially offer new opportunities for Parliament to engage with the public, collect and analyse greater amounts of data and reach out to stakeholders beyond the ‘usual suspects’.

But such developments also pose new challenges, not least in relation to privacy and security, training, infrastructure and accessibility. This event will explore the problems in the legislative process – e.g. time, speed, resources, access to expert knowledge, scrutiny capacity – and how new technological developments might help solve them.

Bringing together experts from Parliament and the technology sectors we will explore how Westminster could utilise the rupture of being uprooted from the Palace to drive innovation in the legislative process.

Schedule

  • 2.00pm: Open
  • 2.30pm: Session 1 - Capacity, Scrutiny and Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities
  • 4.00pm: Break
  • 4.30pm: Session 2 - Parliament as an Innovation Lab: Restoration and Renewal… and Beyond
  • 6.00pm: Drinks reception

This event forms part of the Hansard Society’s work on Sense4Us, a multi-national technology research project funded by the European Union.

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

A new Member of Parliament swearing on the Koran in the House of Commons, Westminster
blog / 18.12.18

Defining the role of parliamentarians in Jersey

In 2018, Jersey saw the launch and then abandonment of what could have been a unique official attempt to define formally the role of the jurisdiction’s parliamentarians.

Defining the role of parliamentarians in Jersey
Westminster Lens logo, Houses of Parliament
blog / 14.12.18

Westminster Lens: Brexit Statutory Instruments Dashboard

In the run-up to the UK’s exit from the EU on 29 March 2019 we will be tracking the progress made by government and Parliament in preparing the statute book for exit day. Our analysis draws on parliamentary data and our own Statutory Instrument Tracker which we built several years ago to support our research on delegated legislation.

Westminster Lens: Brexit Statutory Instruments Dashboard
Parliament with Union Jack
blog / 10.12.18

Six ways the ‘meaningful vote’ is noteworthy: The Withdrawal Agreement & Parliament’s role in treaty-making

If the result of the ‘meaningful vote’ - whenever it is held - is that no UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement enters into force, it could be near-unique in 170 years of UK treaty-making. But if the Withdrawal Agreement goes through, its parliamentary process will still be unusual: it could be the UK treaty with the most parliamentary decision-making involvement ever.

Six ways the ‘meaningful vote’ is noteworthy: The Withdrawal Agreement & Parliament’s role in treaty-making
Facebook binoculars
blog / 27.11.18

The DCMS Committee, Facebook and parliamentary powers and privilege

For its ‘fake news’ inquiry the House of Commons DCMS Committee has reportedly acquired papers related to a US court case involving Facebook. Andrew Kennon, former Commons Clerk of Committees, says the incident shows how the House’s powers to obtain evidence do work, but that it might also weaken the case for Parliament’s necessary powers in the long term.

The DCMS Committee, Facebook and parliamentary powers and privilege
Painting of the signing of Treaty of Versailles
blog / 20.11.18

Parliamentary consent to treaty ratifications: another procedure strained by Brexit?

Attention is focused on the ‘meaningful vote’ on the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement, but the Agreement will also be subject to a parliamentary ratification consent procedure, under the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, notable mainly for not involving a vote.

Parliamentary consent to treaty ratifications: another procedure strained by Brexit?
Prev
Next