From finance to healthcare, technology has transformed the way we live, work and play, with innovative solutions to some of the world’s biggest challenges. Can it also have a role in how we make our laws?
Watch in full
Director of Digital Development, Parliamentary Digital Service and former Head of Web Development, The National Archives.
Principal Researcher in Government Innovation, Nesta and former Head of Research,The Young Foundation.
Stella Creasy MP
Labour & Co-op MP for Walthamstow, Member of the Science and Technology Select Committee.
Dr Ruth Fox
Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society.
Founder and CEO of The Conversational Century and former Government and Politics Specialist, Facebook.
Liam Laurence Smyth
Clerk of Legislation, House of Commons and former Acting Director, Chamber Business, House of Commons.
Head of Research, mySociety, and awarded best paper at the 2016 Conference for eDemocracy and Open Government.
Partnership Lead, Make it Digital, BBC and freelance journalist, commentator and technology critic.
Innovation Director at IT Innovation Centre, University of Southampton.
About the event
The proposed refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster after 2020 presents a rare one in 150 year opportunity for reform of the principal institution of our democracy.
With MPs and Peers due to move out of the Palace into alternative locations in the Westminster area for a few years, could these temporary new Houses be turned into parliamentary laboratories to trial and test new digital technology to support the legislative and scrutiny process?
Recent innovations, for example in relation to data science and social media analysis, potentially offer new opportunities for Parliament to engage with the public, collect and analyse greater amounts of data and reach out to stakeholders beyond the ‘usual suspects’.
But such developments also pose new challenges, not least in relation to privacy and security, training, infrastructure and accessibility. This event will explore the problems in the legislative process – e.g. time, speed, resources, access to expert knowledge, scrutiny capacity – and how new technological developments might help solve them.
Bringing together experts from Parliament and the technology sectors we will explore how Westminster could utilise the rupture of being uprooted from the Palace to drive innovation in the legislative process.
- 2.00pm: Open
- 2.30pm: Session 1 - Capacity, Scrutiny and Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities
- 4.00pm: Break
- 4.30pm: Session 2 - Parliament as an Innovation Lab: Restoration and Renewal… and Beyond
- 6.00pm: Drinks reception
This event forms part of the Hansard Society’s work on Sense4Us, a multi-national technology research project funded by the European Union.
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
The Hansard Society hosted two online hustings for the candidates in the 2021 Lord Speaker election. The first event, on 25 March, was chaired by the BBC’s parliamentary correspondent Mark D’Arcy; and the second, on 13 April, was chaired by Jackie Ashley, former political correspondent and broadcaster.
The Strategic Review of the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal programme has been published, after 10 months’ work – but political factors mean that implementation of the programme’s main conclusion, that there will be a ‘full decant’ from the building while work takes place, remains in doubt.
In order to raise income, the government needs to obtain approval from Parliament for its taxation plans. The Budget process is the means by which the House of Commons considers the government’s plans to impose ‘charges on the people’ and its assessment of the wider state of the economy.
The Finance Bill enacts the government’s Budget provisions – its income-raising proposals and detailed tax changes. Parliament’s scrutiny and authorisation of these taxation plans are crucial in holding the government to account – between elections – for the money it raises and spends.
Lord Frost’s appointment as Minister of State in the Cabinet Office to lead on UK-EU relations brings some welcome clarity about future government arrangements in this area. However, it also raises challenges for parliamentary scrutiny, above all with respect to his status as a Member of the House of Lords.
There was controversy on 9 February over whether the government had used procedural trickery to swerve a backbench rebellion in the House of Commons on a clause inserted in the Trade Bill by the House of Lords. Apparently, it was something to do with ‘packaging’. What does that mean, and was it true? The answer is all about ‘ping-pong’.