From finance to healthcare, technology has transformed the way we live, work and play, with innovative solutions to some of the world’s biggest challenges. Can it also have a role in how we make our laws?
Watch in full
Director of Digital Development, Parliamentary Digital Service and former Head of Web Development, The National Archives.
Principal Researcher in Government Innovation, Nesta and former Head of Research,The Young Foundation.
Stella Creasy MP
Labour & Co-op MP for Walthamstow, Member of the Science and Technology Select Committee.
Dr Ruth Fox
Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society.
Founder and CEO of The Conversational Century and former Government and Politics Specialist, Facebook.
Liam Laurence Smyth
Clerk of Legislation, House of Commons and former Acting Director, Chamber Business, House of Commons.
Head of Research, mySociety, and awarded best paper at the 2016 Conference for eDemocracy and Open Government.
Partnership Lead, Make it Digital, BBC and freelance journalist, commentator and technology critic.
Innovation Director at IT Innovation Centre, University of Southampton.
About the event
The proposed refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster after 2020 presents a rare one in 150 year opportunity for reform of the principal institution of our democracy.
With MPs and Peers due to move out of the Palace into alternative locations in the Westminster area for a few years, could these temporary new Houses be turned into parliamentary laboratories to trial and test new digital technology to support the legislative and scrutiny process?
Recent innovations, for example in relation to data science and social media analysis, potentially offer new opportunities for Parliament to engage with the public, collect and analyse greater amounts of data and reach out to stakeholders beyond the ‘usual suspects’.
But such developments also pose new challenges, not least in relation to privacy and security, training, infrastructure and accessibility. This event will explore the problems in the legislative process – e.g. time, speed, resources, access to expert knowledge, scrutiny capacity – and how new technological developments might help solve them.
Bringing together experts from Parliament and the technology sectors we will explore how Westminster could utilise the rupture of being uprooted from the Palace to drive innovation in the legislative process.
- 2.00pm: Open
- 2.30pm: Session 1 - Capacity, Scrutiny and Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities
- 4.00pm: Break
- 4.30pm: Session 2 - Parliament as an Innovation Lab: Restoration and Renewal… and Beyond
- 6.00pm: Drinks reception
This event forms part of the Hansard Society’s work on Sense4Us, a multi-national technology research project funded by the European Union.
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
Parliament’s role around the end of the Brexit transition and conclusion of the EU future relationship treaty is a constitutional failure to properly scrutinise the executive and the law. As the UK moves to do things differently after 1 January, MPs must do more to ensure they can better discharge their responsibilities regarding the making of UK treaties.
The EU (Future Relationship) Bill is to be considered by both Houses in just one sitting day. How unusual is such an expedited timetable and how much time will parliamentarians really have to look at the Bill? How will MPs participate in proceedings given Covid-19 restrictions? And how will proceedings, particularly the amendment process, work on the day?
The Coronavirus pandemic has added to the questions surrounding the nature of the Parliament that should emerge from the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal programme. But, with concerns over the programme’s governance and public engagement rising, the report arising from the current review of the programme will not now be published this year.
The debate about remote participation in House of Commons proceedings raises critical questions about what constitutes a ‘good parliamentarian’, what ‘fair’ participation looks like, and who gets to decide. As things stand, the exclusion from much parliamentary business of pregnant women, among others, undermines equality of political representation.
Disputed parliamentary election results – often taking months to resolve – were a frequent feature of English political culture before the reforms of the 19th century. But how could defeated candidates protest the result of an election, and how were such disputes resolved?
The government has established an independent review of judicial review – but post-legislative scrutiny has not yet been conducted on the previous reform of the system, in the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. This is typical of the low priority given to post-legislative scrutiny by both government and Parliament.