From finance to healthcare, technology has transformed the way we live, work and play, with innovative solutions to some of the world’s biggest challenges. Can it also have a role in how we make our laws?

Watch in full

Panel one

Panel two

Speakers

Emma Allen
Director of Digital Development, Parliamentary Digital Service and former Head of Web Development, The National Archives.

Victoria Boelman
Principal Researcher in Government Innovation, Nesta and former Head of Research,The Young Foundation.

Stella Creasy MP
Labour & Co-op MP for Walthamstow, Member of the Science and Technology Select Committee.

Dr Ruth Fox
Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society.

Elizabeth Linder
Founder and CEO of The Conversational Century and former Government and Politics Specialist, Facebook.

Liam Laurence Smyth
Clerk of Legislation, House of Commons and former Acting Director, Chamber Business, House of Commons.

Rebecca Rumbul
Head of Research, mySociety, and awarded best paper at the 2016 Conference for eDemocracy and Open Government.

Bill Thompson
Partnership Lead, Make it Digital, BBC and freelance journalist, commentator and technology critic.

Paul Walland
Innovation Director at IT Innovation Centre, University of Southampton.

About the event

The proposed refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster after 2020 presents a rare one in 150 year opportunity for reform of the principal institution of our democracy.

With MPs and Peers due to move out of the Palace into alternative locations in the Westminster area for a few years, could these temporary new Houses be turned into parliamentary laboratories to trial and test new digital technology to support the legislative and scrutiny process?

Recent innovations, for example in relation to data science and social media analysis, potentially offer new opportunities for Parliament to engage with the public, collect and analyse greater amounts of data and reach out to stakeholders beyond the ‘usual suspects’.

But such developments also pose new challenges, not least in relation to privacy and security, training, infrastructure and accessibility. This event will explore the problems in the legislative process – e.g. time, speed, resources, access to expert knowledge, scrutiny capacity – and how new technological developments might help solve them.

Bringing together experts from Parliament and the technology sectors we will explore how Westminster could utilise the rupture of being uprooted from the Palace to drive innovation in the legislative process.

Schedule

  • 2.00pm: Open
  • 2.30pm: Session 1 - Capacity, Scrutiny and Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities
  • 4.00pm: Break
  • 4.30pm: Session 2 - Parliament as an Innovation Lab: Restoration and Renewal… and Beyond
  • 6.00pm: Drinks reception

This event forms part of the Hansard Society’s work on Sense4Us, a multi-national technology research project funded by the European Union.

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

Liz Truss, UK Government Foreign Secretary
blog / 21.01.22

Back to the future? House of Commons scrutiny of EU affairs after Lord Frost’s exit

The recent rearrangement of responsibilities for the government’s handling of EU-related affairs raises questions about future parliamentary scrutiny of these issues. In some respects pre-2016 institutional arrangements are restored, but the post-Brexit landscape presents new scrutiny challenges which thus far MPs have not confronted.

Back to the future? House of Commons scrutiny of EU affairs after Lord Frost’s exit
Palace of Westminster, Houses of Parliament, at dusk
blog / 14.01.22

Living on a prayer (motion): How do parliamentarians debate ‘made negative’ Statutory Instruments?

A recent House of Lords debate on a ‘made negative’ Statutory Instrument highlights Peers’ greater appetite and ability to secure such debates compared to MPs. Data on debate lengths suggests parliamentarians are more likely to give more meaningful scrutiny to SIs they wish to debate than those on which they are obliged to spend time by current procedures.

Living on a prayer (motion): How do parliamentarians debate ‘made negative’ Statutory Instruments?
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, the Rt Hon Sajid Javid MP, making a statement to the House of Commons updating Members on Covid-19, 8 December 2021 (©) House of Commons / Jessica Taylor
publications / briefings / 2021

What Covid Regulations might MPs be asked to debate on 14 December and how will the Regulations be approved?

What Covid Regulations will the House of Commons debate on 14 December, and how? Amid backbench unrest, the occasion will be shaped by the interplay between delegated legislation scrutiny, parliamentary procedures, and raw politics. The outcome could have profound consequences for both public health policy and the Prime Minister’s position.

What Covid Regulations might MPs be asked to debate on 14 December and how will the Regulations be approved?
Photo of an HGV
blog / 03.12.21

In it for the long haul: HGV driver shortage Statutory Instruments show scrutiny system shortcomings

Statutory Instruments (SIs) have been a key tool in the government’s response to shortages of heavy goods vehicle (HGV) drivers. These SIs showcase the usefulness of this type of law-making but also highlight again some of the longstanding problems with its parliamentary scrutiny.

In it for the long haul: HGV driver shortage Statutory Instruments show scrutiny system shortcomings
Prev
Next