From finance to healthcare, technology has transformed the way we live, work and play, with innovative solutions to some of the world’s biggest challenges. Can it also have a role in how we make our laws?

Watch in full

Panel one

Panel two

Speakers

Emma Allen
Director of Digital Development, Parliamentary Digital Service and former Head of Web Development, The National Archives.

Victoria Boelman
Principal Researcher in Government Innovation, Nesta and former Head of Research,The Young Foundation.

Stella Creasy MP
Labour & Co-op MP for Walthamstow, Member of the Science and Technology Select Committee.

Dr Ruth Fox
Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society.

Elizabeth Linder
Founder and CEO of The Conversational Century and former Government and Politics Specialist, Facebook.

Liam Laurence Smyth
Clerk of Legislation, House of Commons and former Acting Director, Chamber Business, House of Commons.

Rebecca Rumbul
Head of Research, mySociety, and awarded best paper at the 2016 Conference for eDemocracy and Open Government.

Bill Thompson
Partnership Lead, Make it Digital, BBC and freelance journalist, commentator and technology critic.

Paul Walland
Innovation Director at IT Innovation Centre, University of Southampton.

About the event

The proposed refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster after 2020 presents a rare one in 150 year opportunity for reform of the principal institution of our democracy.

With MPs and Peers due to move out of the Palace into alternative locations in the Westminster area for a few years, could these temporary new Houses be turned into parliamentary laboratories to trial and test new digital technology to support the legislative and scrutiny process?

Recent innovations, for example in relation to data science and social media analysis, potentially offer new opportunities for Parliament to engage with the public, collect and analyse greater amounts of data and reach out to stakeholders beyond the ‘usual suspects’.

But such developments also pose new challenges, not least in relation to privacy and security, training, infrastructure and accessibility. This event will explore the problems in the legislative process – e.g. time, speed, resources, access to expert knowledge, scrutiny capacity – and how new technological developments might help solve them.

Bringing together experts from Parliament and the technology sectors we will explore how Westminster could utilise the rupture of being uprooted from the Palace to drive innovation in the legislative process.

Schedule

  • 2.00pm: Open
  • 2.30pm: Session 1 - Capacity, Scrutiny and Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities
  • 4.00pm: Break
  • 4.30pm: Session 2 - Parliament as an Innovation Lab: Restoration and Renewal… and Beyond
  • 6.00pm: Drinks reception

This event forms part of the Hansard Society’s work on Sense4Us, a multi-national technology research project funded by the European Union.

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

More

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Westminster
blog / 07.08.18

Will Brexit change the UK constitution?

Whilst the *Miller* case may be seen as a victory for Parliament, it simultaneously highlights significant constitutional weaknesses on issues such as devolution and the role of referendums. Is it time to consider whether the UK constitution needs more legal as opposed to political regulation?

Will Brexit change the UK constitution?
Canadian Parliament
blog / 06.08.18

Canada’s ‘amateur’ MPs

In Canada, the ‘professional politician’ remains the exception rather than the rule, and MPs with prior political experience don’t have an advantage in the development of their parliamentary careers.

Canada’s ‘amateur’ MPs
Map of the world covered in map pins
blog / 03.08.18

Metrics for 'Global Britain' - a select committee proposal

If the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee published regular 'Metrics for Global Britain' it could attach clear indicators to an otherwise politicised term, enhancing the committee's scrutiny work and providing hooks for boosting its public and media profile. In evidence to the committee published in July, we explained how.

Metrics for 'Global Britain' - a select committee proposal
EU stars and documents
blog / 11.07.18

EU (Withdrawal) Act SIs: will sifting make a difference?

MPs are setting up the new sifting committee for delegated legislation under the EU (Withdrawal) Act, but the new procedure simply bolts a toothless sift onto the front of existing inadequate procedures.

EU (Withdrawal) Act SIs: will sifting make a difference?
Women entering a polling station in the UK during the European Parliament elections
blog / 11.07.18

How important are competence and leadership in people's party choice?

At a time of political upheaval – with questions being asked about the leadership, policies and competence of both main UK parties – our Audit of Political Engagement reveals some interesting findings about the ways in which Conservative and Labour supporters view these factors differently and how their importance has changed over time.

How important are competence and leadership in people's party choice?
UK and EU flags superimposed on top of the Houses of Parliament.
publications / briefings

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill: Consideration of House of Lords amendments 110, 10 and 4 concerning scrutiny of delegated powers and Statutory Instruments

As the EU (Withdrawal) Bill arrives back in the House of Commons for consideration of House of Lords amendments, this briefing paper for MPs sets out our concerns about three amendments - 110, 10 and 4 - concerning scrutiny of delegated powers and Statutory Instruments.

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill: Consideration of House of Lords amendments 110, 10 and 4 concerning scrutiny of delegated powers and Statutory Instruments
Prev
Next