From finance to healthcare, technology has transformed the way we live, work and play, with innovative solutions to some of the world’s biggest challenges. Can it also have a role in how we make our laws?

Watch in full

Panel one

Panel two

Speakers

Emma Allen
Director of Digital Development, Parliamentary Digital Service and former Head of Web Development, The National Archives.

Victoria Boelman
Principal Researcher in Government Innovation, Nesta and former Head of Research,The Young Foundation.

Stella Creasy MP
Labour & Co-op MP for Walthamstow, Member of the Science and Technology Select Committee.

Dr Ruth Fox
Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society.

Elizabeth Linder
Founder and CEO of The Conversational Century and former Government and Politics Specialist, Facebook.

Liam Laurence Smyth
Clerk of Legislation, House of Commons and former Acting Director, Chamber Business, House of Commons.

Rebecca Rumbul
Head of Research, mySociety, and awarded best paper at the 2016 Conference for eDemocracy and Open Government.

Bill Thompson
Partnership Lead, Make it Digital, BBC and freelance journalist, commentator and technology critic.

Paul Walland
Innovation Director at IT Innovation Centre, University of Southampton.

About the event

The proposed refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster after 2020 presents a rare one in 150 year opportunity for reform of the principal institution of our democracy.

With MPs and Peers due to move out of the Palace into alternative locations in the Westminster area for a few years, could these temporary new Houses be turned into parliamentary laboratories to trial and test new digital technology to support the legislative and scrutiny process?

Recent innovations, for example in relation to data science and social media analysis, potentially offer new opportunities for Parliament to engage with the public, collect and analyse greater amounts of data and reach out to stakeholders beyond the ‘usual suspects’.

But such developments also pose new challenges, not least in relation to privacy and security, training, infrastructure and accessibility. This event will explore the problems in the legislative process – e.g. time, speed, resources, access to expert knowledge, scrutiny capacity – and how new technological developments might help solve them.

Bringing together experts from Parliament and the technology sectors we will explore how Westminster could utilise the rupture of being uprooted from the Palace to drive innovation in the legislative process.

Schedule

  • 2.00pm: Open
  • 2.30pm: Session 1 - Capacity, Scrutiny and Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities
  • 4.00pm: Break
  • 4.30pm: Session 2 - Parliament as an Innovation Lab: Restoration and Renewal… and Beyond
  • 6.00pm: Drinks reception

This event forms part of the Hansard Society’s work on Sense4Us, a multi-national technology research project funded by the European Union.

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

First sitting of the House of Commons after the State Opening of Parliament
blog / 19.10.18

Losers don’t lose hope: opposition supporters are now more likely than government supporters to believe they can change the country

Supporters of the winning party at UK general elections have traditionally enjoyed a greater sense of political efficacy in terms of their perceived ability to effect change at the national level. But the Audit of Political Engagement data shows that this winner-loser dynamic has not just weakened in recent years but has actively reversed.

Losers don’t lose hope: opposition supporters are now more likely than government supporters to believe they can change the country
Photo of people in a meeting depicting a citizens' assembly
blog / 10.10.18

How a Citizens’ Assembly helped select committees find social care consensus

Select committee Chairs Clive Betts MP and Sarah Wollaston MP explain how using a Citizens’ Assembly helped their committees find a consensus and produce a unanimous joint report for their recent inquiry into the long-term funding of adult social care, in an important innovation in select committee practice.

How a Citizens’ Assembly helped select committees find social care consensus
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Westminster
blog / 07.08.18

Will Brexit change the UK constitution?

Whilst the Miller case may be seen as a victory for Parliament, it simultaneously highlights significant constitutional weaknesses on issues such as devolution and the role of referendums. Is it time to consider whether the UK constitution needs more legal as opposed to political regulation?

Will Brexit change the UK constitution?
Canadian Parliament
blog / 06.08.18

Canada’s ‘amateur’ MPs

In Canada, the ‘professional politician’ remains the exception rather than the rule, and MPs with prior political experience don’t have an advantage in the development of their parliamentary careers.

Canada’s ‘amateur’ MPs
Map of the world covered in map pins
blog / 03.08.18

Metrics for ‘Global Britain’ - a select committee proposal

If the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee published regular ‘Metrics for Global Britain’ it could attach clear indicators to an otherwise politicised term, enhancing the committee’s scrutiny work and providing hooks for boosting its public and media profile. In evidence to the committee published in July, we explained how.

Metrics for ‘Global Britain’ - a select committee proposal
Prev
Next