From finance to healthcare, technology has transformed the way we live, work and play, with innovative solutions to some of the world’s biggest challenges. Can it also have a role in how we make our laws?
Watch in full
Director of Digital Development, Parliamentary Digital Service and former Head of Web Development, The National Archives.
Principal Researcher in Government Innovation, Nesta and former Head of Research,The Young Foundation.
Stella Creasy MP
Labour & Co-op MP for Walthamstow, Member of the Science and Technology Select Committee.
Dr Ruth Fox
Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society.
Founder and CEO of The Conversational Century and former Government and Politics Specialist, Facebook.
Liam Laurence Smyth
Clerk of Legislation, House of Commons and former Acting Director, Chamber Business, House of Commons.
Head of Research, mySociety, and awarded best paper at the 2016 Conference for eDemocracy and Open Government.
Partnership Lead, Make it Digital, BBC and freelance journalist, commentator and technology critic.
Innovation Director at IT Innovation Centre, University of Southampton.
About the event
The proposed refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster after 2020 presents a rare one in 150 year opportunity for reform of the principal institution of our democracy.
With MPs and Peers due to move out of the Palace into alternative locations in the Westminster area for a few years, could these temporary new Houses be turned into parliamentary laboratories to trial and test new digital technology to support the legislative and scrutiny process?
Recent innovations, for example in relation to data science and social media analysis, potentially offer new opportunities for Parliament to engage with the public, collect and analyse greater amounts of data and reach out to stakeholders beyond the ‘usual suspects’.
But such developments also pose new challenges, not least in relation to privacy and security, training, infrastructure and accessibility. This event will explore the problems in the legislative process – e.g. time, speed, resources, access to expert knowledge, scrutiny capacity – and how new technological developments might help solve them.
Bringing together experts from Parliament and the technology sectors we will explore how Westminster could utilise the rupture of being uprooted from the Palace to drive innovation in the legislative process.
- 2.00pm: Open
- 2.30pm: Session 1 - Capacity, Scrutiny and Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities
- 4.00pm: Break
- 4.30pm: Session 2 - Parliament as an Innovation Lab: Restoration and Renewal… and Beyond
- 6.00pm: Drinks reception
This event forms part of the Hansard Society’s work on Sense4Us, a multi-national technology research project funded by the European Union.
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
Stay on top of the key Brexit developments in Parliament this autumn in our regularly updated procedural and constitutional guide.
The Supreme Court’s 24 September nullification of the prorogation that had at that point been underway presented Parliament with a procedural and record-keeping problem. Here, the Clerks of the Journals in the two Houses explain how it was resolved.
The Supreme Court’s judgement that the government’s prorogation of Parliament was unlawful was due in part to concern that the legislature’s ability to scrutinise Statutory Instruments would be compromised. But as ‘exit day’ nears, and with a new, shorter prorogation planned, the inadequacies of the parliamentary scrutiny process for SIs become ever starker.
In its recent landmark report, the House of Commons Liaison Committee recommended a widening of the circle of those that select committees should hold to account, and a turn towards the public in all committee activity, but also tighter links between select committees and the House of Commons Chamber.
The House of Commons’ last business before it was controversially prorogued on 9 September was the announcement of Royal Assent to the Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Act 2019. Just as the UK’s parliamentary democracy was being questioned, a significant step forward was taken to safeguard the building that both houses and symbolises it.