On 15 October 2019, all nine original candidates to be the new Speaker of the House of Commons participated in a hustings event in Westminster, hosted jointly by the Hansard Society and The House magazine, and chaired by the BBC’s Carolyn Quinn.
The event was attended by a large number of MPs, who had the opportunity to put questions to the candidates seeking their support, as well as by parliamentary and MPs’ staff, and journalists. Each candidate made an opening statement about their approach to, and priorities for, the role, before taking questions.
The hustings was held three weeks before the House was to decide on the successor to John Bercow, who was stepping down after over a decade in the chair.
The 2019 event continued the Hansard Society’s involvement in Speaker hustings, after the Society hosted the first-ever public Commons Speaker hustings in 2009, and then did the same for the Speakership of the House of Lords in 2016.
In 2019, the nine candidates running for the Commons Speakership at the time of the hustings, and who took part in the event, were:
- Sir Henry Bellingham;
- Chris Bryant;
- Harriet Harman;
- Meg Hillier;
- Sir Lindsay Hoyle;
- Dame Eleanor Laing;
- Sir Edward Leigh;
- Shailesh Vara; and
- Dame Rosie Winterton.
Sir Henry Bellingham and Shailesh Vara withdrew from the race before the House voted on 4 November.
The hustings were recorded and broadcast by BBC Parliament.
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
Should the Liaison Committee have as its chair someone who is not simultaneously a select committee chair, and should the identity of that person be determined by the government? The answer to these questions will tell us much about how this cohort of MPs, particularly government backbenchers, view the relationship between Parliament and the executive.
The Coronavirus crisis is spotlighting the importance of the House of Commons Chamber in our democratic life. 7-8 May marks 80 years since the Norway Debate, the event which demonstrated this most famously. Over two days of debate, MPs’ performances in the Chamber and a decision to force a division had historic consequences.
The extensive take-up of remote evidence-taking by House of Commons select committees during the Easter recess is a significant Coronavirus-induced change of practice. It shows how procedural and technological change can help support scrutiny.
Several parliamentary committees scrutinise delegated powers and delegated legislation. But what is the aim of this scrutiny, what standards are applied, and what are the value and limits of Parliament’s role in this aspect of the legislative process?
There will be gaps in a new House of Commons’ scrutiny of the government and engagement with the public until the events required at the start of a Parliament have taken place and all the necessary institutions and processes have been re-established. The length of time taken over procedures at the start of a Parliament therefore matters.
There have been many calls for Parliament to become ‘virtual’ during the Coronavirus pandemic, using remote working to ensure proper scrutiny of government during the crisis. But how should a ‘virtual’ Parliament operate?