On 12 September, the day after the EU (Withdrawal) Bill received its second reading in the House of Commons, this major one-day public event brought together leading parliamentarians and legal and constitutional specialists from across the UK to discuss the critical issues raised by the Bill and its prospects in the UK’s parliaments and assemblies.
Listen to the event in full
Video recordings of all the panels
are available on the UK in a Changing Europe website.
9.00 Registration and coffee
9.30 Welcome and introduction
Professor Anand Menon, Director, ESRC UK in a Changing Europe
9.35 The EU (Withdrawal) Bill: Overview
The Government’s approach
- Daniel Denman, Director, Legal Advisors, Department for Exiting the EU
Legislating for Brexit: the issues
- Professor Sionaidh Douglas-Scott, Anniversary Chair in Law, Queen Mary University of London
10.45 Delegated Powers
- Chair: Dr Ruth Fox, Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society
- Michael P. Clancy OBE, Director, Law Reform, Law Society of Scotland
- Professor Mark Elliott, Professor of Public Law, University of Cambridge; Legal Adviser, House of Lords Constitution Committee
- Lord Lisvane, Member, House of Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee; former Clerk of the House of Commons
13.00 Rights and Enforcement
- Chair: Marie Demetriou QC, Brick Court Chambers
- Professor Catherine Barnard, Professor of European Union Law, Cambridge University, and ESRC UK in a Changing Europe
- Martha Spurrier, Director, Liberty
- Chair: Professor Dan Wincott, Professor of Law and Society, Wales Governance Centre, Cardiff University
- Professor Colin Harvey, Professor of Human Rights Law, Queen’s University Belfast, and ESRC UK in a Changing Europe
- Dr Jo Hunt, Reader in Law, Cardiff University, and ESRC UK in a Changing Europe
- Professor Stephen Tierney, Professor of Constitutional Theory, Edinburgh University, and ESRC UK in a Changing Europe; Legal Adviser, House of Lords Constitution Committee
15.30 Parliamentary Perspectives
- Chair: Professor Richard Rawlings, Professor of Public Law, University College London, and Honorary Distinguished Professor, School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University
A panel (subject to parliamentary business) including:
- Hilary Benn MP, Chair, House of Commons Committee on Exiting the EU (Labour)
- Sir Bill Cash MP, previous Chair, House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee (Conservative)
- Joanna Cherry QC MP, Member, House of Commons Committee on Exiting the EU (SNP)
- Dr Stephen Farry MLA, Deputy Leader and Brexit spokesman, Alliance Party
- Eluned Morgan AM, Baroness Morgan of Ely, Member, National Assembly for Wales External Affairs and Additional Legislation Committee (Labour)
The event is funded by the ESRC UK in a Changing Europe initiative, and co-convened by Cardiff University’s Wales Governance Centre and the Hansard Society.
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
Should the Liaison Committee have as its chair someone who is not simultaneously a select committee chair, and should the identity of that person be determined by the government? The answer to these questions will tell us much about how this cohort of MPs, particularly government backbenchers, view the relationship between Parliament and the executive.
The Coronavirus crisis is spotlighting the importance of the House of Commons Chamber in our democratic life. 7-8 May marks 80 years since the Norway Debate, the event which demonstrated this most famously. Over two days of debate, MPs’ performances in the Chamber and a decision to force a division had historic consequences.
The extensive take-up of remote evidence-taking by House of Commons select committees during the Easter recess is a significant Coronavirus-induced change of practice. It shows how procedural and technological change can help support scrutiny.
Several parliamentary committees scrutinise delegated powers and delegated legislation. But what is the aim of this scrutiny, what standards are applied, and what are the value and limits of Parliament’s role in this aspect of the legislative process?
There will be gaps in a new House of Commons’ scrutiny of the government and engagement with the public until the events required at the start of a Parliament have taken place and all the necessary institutions and processes have been re-established. The length of time taken over procedures at the start of a Parliament therefore matters.
There have been many calls for Parliament to become ‘virtual’ during the Coronavirus pandemic, using remote working to ensure proper scrutiny of government during the crisis. But how should a ‘virtual’ Parliament operate?