On 12 September, the day after the EU (Withdrawal) Bill received its second reading in the House of Commons, this major one-day public event brought together leading parliamentarians and legal and constitutional specialists from across the UK to discuss the critical issues raised by the Bill and its prospects in the UK’s parliaments and assemblies.
Listen to the event in full
Video recordings of all the panels
are available on the UK in a Changing Europe website.
9.00 Registration and coffee
9.30 Welcome and introduction
Professor Anand Menon, Director, ESRC UK in a Changing Europe
9.35 The EU (Withdrawal) Bill: Overview
The Government’s approach
- Daniel Denman, Director, Legal Advisors, Department for Exiting the EU
Legislating for Brexit: the issues
- Professor Sionaidh Douglas-Scott, Anniversary Chair in Law, Queen Mary University of London
10.45 Delegated Powers
- Chair: Dr Ruth Fox, Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society
- Michael P. Clancy OBE, Director, Law Reform, Law Society of Scotland
- Professor Mark Elliott, Professor of Public Law, University of Cambridge; Legal Adviser, House of Lords Constitution Committee
- Lord Lisvane, Member, House of Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee; former Clerk of the House of Commons
13.00 Rights and Enforcement
- Chair: Marie Demetriou QC, Brick Court Chambers
- Professor Catherine Barnard, Professor of European Union Law, Cambridge University, and ESRC UK in a Changing Europe
- Martha Spurrier, Director, Liberty
- Chair: Professor Dan Wincott, Professor of Law and Society, Wales Governance Centre, Cardiff University
- Professor Colin Harvey, Professor of Human Rights Law, Queen’s University Belfast, and ESRC UK in a Changing Europe
- Dr Jo Hunt, Reader in Law, Cardiff University, and ESRC UK in a Changing Europe
- Professor Stephen Tierney, Professor of Constitutional Theory, Edinburgh University, and ESRC UK in a Changing Europe; Legal Adviser, House of Lords Constitution Committee
15.30 Parliamentary Perspectives
- Chair: Professor Richard Rawlings, Professor of Public Law, University College London, and Honorary Distinguished Professor, School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University
A panel (subject to parliamentary business) including:
- Hilary Benn MP, Chair, House of Commons Committee on Exiting the EU (Labour)
- Sir Bill Cash MP, previous Chair, House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee (Conservative)
- Joanna Cherry QC MP, Member, House of Commons Committee on Exiting the EU (SNP)
- Dr Stephen Farry MLA, Deputy Leader and Brexit spokesman, Alliance Party
- Eluned Morgan AM, Baroness Morgan of Ely, Member, National Assembly for Wales External Affairs and Additional Legislation Committee (Labour)
The event is funded by the ESRC UK in a Changing Europe initiative, and co-convened by Cardiff University’s Wales Governance Centre and the Hansard Society.
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
MPs should take the opportunity to show the government and their constituents that they want to have more say on free trade agreements than they did when the UK was inside the EU.
In order to incur expenditure the government needs to obtain approval from Parliament for its departmental spending plans. The annual Estimates process is the means by which the House of Commons controls the government’s plans for the spending of money raised through taxation.
Articles on themes including the development of Sweden’s now 100-year-old parliamentary democracy, strategic voting among Lib Dem supporters in the 2015 general election, policy areas associated with personal attacks at Prime Minister’s Questions, UK intergovernmental relations and spending after the Conservative-DUP ‘confidence and supply’ deal, and more.
In Ireland, the Covid-19 crisis collided with a ‘change election’, the formation of a historic coalition government and the ‘end of Civil War politics’. But the pandemic sucked much of the oxygen out of a heightened political atmosphere, and also occasioned the physical relocation of Parliament, challenging the institution’s operation and culture.
Submitting evidence before the House was to take further decisions on its Coronavirus arrangements, we decried the Leader of the House’s decision to end hybrid proceedings and remote voting as "over-hasty, poorly thought-through, unwise and unnecessary". Our recommendations covered House business, risk management, delegated legislation and select committees.
The new review of the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal project opens up a range of different outcomes for the future of the building. However, with the alarming state of the Palace not changed by the Coronavirus, the government should not use the pandemic as an excuse to downgrade or delay the much-needed repairs.