The Ukrainian Parliament after four years of war

Events

The Ukrainian Parliament after four years of war - Dr Sarah Whitmore

24 Feb 2026

The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. © Bluraz / Adobe Stock

On the fourth anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Dr Sarah Whitmore spoke to us about how the Ukrainian Parliament has functioned under wartime conditions.

6:00pm-7:30pm on Tuesday 24 February 2026 at the Houses of Parliament, Westminster

Sarah is renowned for her research on the Ukrainian legislature, since long before the Russian invasion brought the country to global attention. Her article for the Hansard Society shortly after the invasion in 2022, Finding grace under pressure?, was followed by another on the first anniversary, Ukraine’s Parliament: One year at war.

Sarah brought us up to date on how the Parliament of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, has operated in such extreme circumstances and with the further challenge of tackling corruption.

About our guest speaker

Dr Sarah Whitmore is Associate Professor in Politics at Oxford Brookes University. Long before Ukraine came to dominate the news, she was inspired to specialise in Ukrainian politics by her time living in Kyiv.

Sarah was an English teacher in the 1990s at School 254, Borshchahivka, Ukraine, at the Institute of Fisheries and the International Management Institute. She then completed her MA, PhD and ESRC postdoc at the Centre for Russian and East European Studies at the University of Birmingham. Sarah is the author of State-Building in Ukraine: The Ukrainian Parliament and of many peer-reviewed journal articles on Russian and Ukrainian parliamentary politics. She has provided consultancy on Ukrainian domestic politics for UK Government departments and the US Department of State, as well as commentary for a wide range of media. She has two current research projects: one with Professor Bettina Renz, University of Nottingham, on “What sort of military does Ukraine want and need?” (funded by the British Academy); and on how the Verkhovna Rada has been functioning during the full-scale invasion.

Latest / Highlights

News / Will key Government bills pass by the end of the parliamentary Session? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 138

With the King’s Speech set for 13 May, attention turns to the end of the current parliamentary Session and the frantic “wash-up” period before prorogation, likely in late April. We assess which Bills can still make it through in the remaining sitting days. With major Lords amendments on issues including revenge porn, social media access for under-16s, court transcripts and AI safety, Ministers face intense pressure and possible concessions. We also examine the political stakes around the Chagos Islands Bill and the stalled Hillsborough Law. The episode also answers listener questions on parliamentary procedure and reform, before exploring the sharp rise in Written Parliamentary Questions and what it means for effective scrutiny in Westminster. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 23-27 March 2026

The Prime Minister will face questions from the Liaison Committee, comprising Select Committee chairs. The Conservatives will choose the topic for Tuesday’s Opposition Day debate, while the Home Secretary and the Energy and Transport Secretaries will take oral questions from MPs. The Commons will consider Lords amendments to the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, National Insurance Bill, and Victims and Courts Bill, and will continue Committee Stage scrutiny of elections legislation. In the Lords, the Pension Schemes and the Crime and Policing Bills will complete their final stages, while Peers continue scrutiny of the English Devolution Bill. MPs will also debate an e-petition on the puberty blockers trial. Select Committees will focus on child poverty, dynamic alignment, the Defence Investment Plan, energy resilience, national resilience, and Royal Mail service delivery.

News / Who really decides Immigration Rules: Parliament or the Home Secretary? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 137

Who really controls immigration law when Ministers can rewrite key rules with minimal parliamentary scrutiny? Jonathan Featonby of the Refugee Council explains the Home Secretary’s far-reaching powers over Immigration Rules. We also discuss the Crime and Policing Bill, where amendments on AI and abortion highlight the challenges posed by rushed law-making and executive overreach. And we look ahead to the next phase of the assisted dying debate, as supporters in the House of Commons prepare for a renewed legislative push in the next parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

News / Is the assisted dying bill being filibustered? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 135

Debate over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been so slow in the House of Lords that opponents of the Bill are accused of deliberately running down the clock. Conservative Peer Lord Harper rejects claims of filibustering, arguing that Peers are undertaking necessary scrutiny of a flawed and complex bill. He contends the legislation lacks adequate safeguards and was unsuited to the Private Member’s Bill process and discusses whether MPs might attempt to revive it in a future parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS