‘Britain Votes 2017’ offers a comprehensive analysis of one of the most extraordinary general elections ever.
‘Britain Votes 2017’ contains dedicated chapters on the results; the fortunes of each of the major parties; the campaign and outcomes in each part of the UK; the Brexit context; campaign finance; party campaigning and digital strategies; engagement, disengagement and populism; women voters; young voters; the role of the media; and much more.
The latest in a distinguished series of volumes on each general election, produced by the Hansard Society and Oxford University Press, ‘Britain Votes 2017’ is edited by Jonathan Tonge, Cristina Leston-Bandeira and Stuart Wilks-Heeg and features the work of a range of leading academics, including Tim Bale and Paul Webb on the Conservatives; John Curtice on the outcome; Eunice Goes on Labour; Matthew Flinders on engagement, disengagement and populism; Emily Harmer and Rosalynd Southern on women voters; James Dennison on UKIP; Sarah Harrison on young voters; and Sara Hagemann on the Brexit context.
‘Britain Votes 2017’ is essential reading for anyone interested in the campaign, outcome and consequences of the 2017 General Election.
Table of contents
- Introduction: The Mislaying of a Majority – Jonathan Tonge, Cristina Leston-Bandeira, Stuart Wilks-Hee
- The Results: How Britain Voted, David Denver
- How the Electoral System Failed to Deliver - Again, John Curtice
- ‘We Didn’t See it Coming’: The Conservatives – Tim Bale and Paul Webb
- ‘Jez We Can!’: Labour’s Campaign; Defeat with a Taste of Victory – Eunice Goes
- The Liberal Democrats: Green Shoots of Recovery or Still on Life Support? – David Cutts and Andrew Russell
- The Rug Pulled from Under Them: UKIP and the Greens – James Dennison
- Referendums as Critical Junctures? Scottish Voting in British Elections – Ailsa Henderson and James Mitchel
- The Election in Wales: Campaign and Party Performance – Jonathan Bradbury
- Northern Ireland: Double Triumph for the Democratic Unionist Party – Jonathan Tonge and Jocelyn Evans
- The Brexit Context – Sara Hagemann
- Party Finance – Justin Fisher
- Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns – Katharine Dommett and Luke Temple
- Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign – Stephen Ward and Dominic Wring
- The (Anti-)Politics of the Election: Funnelling Frustration in a Divided Democracy – Matthew Flinders
- More Stable than Strong: Womens Representation, Voters and Issues – Emily Harmer and Rosalynd Southern
- Young Voters – Sarah Harrison
- Conclusion: An Election that Satisfied Few and Solved Little – Jonathan Tonge, Cristina Leston-Bandeira and Stuart Wilks-Heeg
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
The Coronavirus pandemic has added to the questions surrounding the nature of the Parliament that should emerge from the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal programme. But, with concerns over the programme’s governance and public engagement rising, the report arising from the current review of the programme will not now be published this year.
The debate about remote participation in House of Commons proceedings raises critical questions about what constitutes a ‘good parliamentarian’, what ‘fair’ participation looks like, and who gets to decide. As things stand, the exclusion from much parliamentary business of pregnant women, among others, undermines equality of political representation.
Disputed parliamentary election results – often taking months to resolve - were a frequent feature of English political culture before the reforms of the 19th century. But how could defeated candidates protest the result of an election, and how were such disputes resolved?
The government has established an independent review of judicial review – but post-legislative scrutiny has not yet been conducted on the previous reform of the system, in the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. This is typical of the low priority given to post-legislative scrutiny by both government and Parliament.
A large body of Coronavirus-related Statutory Instruments have been subject to limited parliamentary scrutiny. Amid growing concern that Parliament is being sidelined by ministers, this briefing explores the procedural obstacles to effective scrutiny of the Covid-19 regulations, and how these might be addressed
Politics in Autumn 2020 will continue to be dominated by Coronavirus and the negotiations with the EU, as the end of the post-Brexit transition period approaches on 31 December. But what will this mean for parliamentary business in the coming months, and what scope will there be to tackle other issues? We pick 15 things to look out for.