‘Britain Votes 2017’ offers a comprehensive analysis of one of the most extraordinary general elections ever.
‘Britain Votes 2017’ contains dedicated chapters on the results; the fortunes of each of the major parties; the campaign and outcomes in each part of the UK; the Brexit context; campaign finance; party campaigning and digital strategies; engagement, disengagement and populism; women voters; young voters; the role of the media; and much more.
The latest in a distinguished series of volumes on each general election, produced by the Hansard Society and Oxford University Press, ‘Britain Votes 2017’ is edited by Jonathan Tonge, Cristina Leston-Bandeira and Stuart Wilks-Heeg and features the work of a range of leading academics, including Tim Bale and Paul Webb on the Conservatives; John Curtice on the outcome; Eunice Goes on Labour; Matthew Flinders on engagement, disengagement and populism; Emily Harmer and Rosalynd Southern on women voters; James Dennison on UKIP; Sarah Harrison on young voters; and Sara Hagemann on the Brexit context.
‘Britain Votes 2017’ is essential reading for anyone interested in the campaign, outcome and consequences of the 2017 General Election.
Table of contents
- Introduction: The Mislaying of a Majority – Jonathan Tonge, Cristina Leston-Bandeira, Stuart Wilks-Hee
- The Results: How Britain Voted, David Denver
- How the Electoral System Failed to Deliver - Again, John Curtice
- ‘We Didn’t See it Coming’: The Conservatives – Tim Bale and Paul Webb
- ‘Jez We Can!’: Labour’s Campaign; Defeat with a Taste of Victory – Eunice Goes
- The Liberal Democrats: Green Shoots of Recovery or Still on Life Support? – David Cutts and Andrew Russell
- The Rug Pulled from Under Them: UKIP and the Greens – James Dennison
- Referendums as Critical Junctures? Scottish Voting in British Elections – Ailsa Henderson and James Mitchel
- The Election in Wales: Campaign and Party Performance – Jonathan Bradbury
- Northern Ireland: Double Triumph for the Democratic Unionist Party – Jonathan Tonge and Jocelyn Evans
- The Brexit Context – Sara Hagemann
- Party Finance – Justin Fisher
- Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns – Katharine Dommett and Luke Temple
- Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign – Stephen Ward and Dominic Wring
- The (Anti-)Politics of the Election: Funnelling Frustration in a Divided Democracy – Matthew Flinders
- More Stable than Strong: Womens Representation, Voters and Issues – Emily Harmer and Rosalynd Southern
- Young Voters – Sarah Harrison
- Conclusion: An Election that Satisfied Few and Solved Little – Jonathan Tonge, Cristina Leston-Bandeira and Stuart Wilks-Heeg
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
MPs are debating motions on ‘made negative’ Statutory Instruments (SIs) on three successive days this week. While the debates will give a last-minute boost to the government’s record for the handling of such SIs in the 2019-21 session, they also highlight how the government’s control of time undermines MPs’ role in scrutinising such Instruments.
Most of the UK’s general public law is made not through Acts of Parliament but through delegated legislation in the form of Statutory Instruments. What is delegated legislation and how does the parliamentary scrutiny system for this legislation work?
The problems with the delegated legislation system have long been known but Brexit and Covid-19 have illuminated them in stark terms. Our Review will lay out a comprehensive plan to address them.
The marginalisation of the House of Commons under Covid has been shocking; a year on, Parliament’s role must urgently be restored
The Hansard Society hosted two online hustings for the candidates in the 2021 Lord Speaker election. The first event, on 25 March, was chaired by the BBC’s parliamentary correspondent Mark D’Arcy; and the second, on 13 April, was chaired by Jackie Ashley, former political correspondent and broadcaster.
The Strategic Review of the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal programme has been published, after 10 months’ work – but political factors mean that implementation of the programme’s main conclusion, that there will be a ‘full decant’ from the building while work takes place, remains in doubt.