‘Britain Votes 2017’ offers a comprehensive analysis of one of the most extraordinary general elections ever.
‘Britain Votes 2017’ contains dedicated chapters on the results; the fortunes of each of the major parties; the campaign and outcomes in each part of the UK; the Brexit context; campaign finance; party campaigning and digital strategies; engagement, disengagement and populism; women voters; young voters; the role of the media; and much more.
The latest in a distinguished series of volumes on each general election, produced by the Hansard Society and Oxford University Press, ‘Britain Votes 2017’ is edited by Jonathan Tonge, Cristina Leston-Bandeira and Stuart Wilks-Heeg and features the work of a range of leading academics, including Tim Bale and Paul Webb on the Conservatives; John Curtice on the outcome; Eunice Goes on Labour; Matthew Flinders on engagement, disengagement and populism; Emily Harmer and Rosalynd Southern on women voters; James Dennison on UKIP; Sarah Harrison on young voters; and Sara Hagemann on the Brexit context.
‘Britain Votes 2017’ is essential reading for anyone interested in the campaign, outcome and consequences of the 2017 General Election.
Table of contents
- Introduction: The Mislaying of a Majority – Jonathan Tonge, Cristina Leston-Bandeira, Stuart Wilks-Hee
- The Results: How Britain Voted, David Denver
- How the Electoral System Failed to Deliver - Again, John Curtice
- ‘We Didn’t See it Coming’: The Conservatives – Tim Bale and Paul Webb
- ‘Jez We Can!’: Labour’s Campaign; Defeat with a Taste of Victory – Eunice Goes
- The Liberal Democrats: Green Shoots of Recovery or Still on Life Support? – David Cutts and Andrew Russell
- The Rug Pulled from Under Them: UKIP and the Greens – James Dennison
- Referendums as Critical Junctures? Scottish Voting in British Elections – Ailsa Henderson and James Mitchel
- The Election in Wales: Campaign and Party Performance – Jonathan Bradbury
- Northern Ireland: Double Triumph for the Democratic Unionist Party – Jonathan Tonge and Jocelyn Evans
- The Brexit Context – Sara Hagemann
- Party Finance – Justin Fisher
- Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns – Katharine Dommett and Luke Temple
- Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign – Stephen Ward and Dominic Wring
- The (Anti-)Politics of the Election: Funnelling Frustration in a Divided Democracy – Matthew Flinders
- More Stable than Strong: Womens Representation, Voters and Issues – Emily Harmer and Rosalynd Southern
- Young Voters – Sarah Harrison
- Conclusion: An Election that Satisfied Few and Solved Little – Jonathan Tonge, Cristina Leston-Bandeira and Stuart Wilks-Heeg
Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it
The recent rearrangement of responsibilities for the government’s handling of EU-related affairs raises questions about future parliamentary scrutiny of these issues. In some respects pre-2016 institutional arrangements are restored, but the post-Brexit landscape presents new scrutiny challenges which thus far MPs have not confronted.
What information and evidence does Parliament need to enable it to oversee government law-making? Is Parliament currently provided with sufficient information and, if not, how can this be improved?
A recent House of Lords debate on a ‘made negative’ Statutory Instrument highlights Peers’ greater appetite and ability to secure such debates compared to MPs. Data on debate lengths suggests parliamentarians are more likely to give more meaningful scrutiny to SIs they wish to debate than those on which they are obliged to spend time by current procedures.
What Covid Regulations will the House of Commons debate on 14 December, and how? Amid backbench unrest, the occasion will be shaped by the interplay between delegated legislation scrutiny, parliamentary procedures, and raw politics. The outcome could have profound consequences for both public health policy and the Prime Minister’s position.
Statutory Instruments (SIs) have been a key tool in the government’s response to shortages of heavy goods vehicle (HGV) drivers. These SIs showcase the usefulness of this type of law-making but also highlight again some of the longstanding problems with its parliamentary scrutiny.
Delegated legislation may not be glamorous but it is essential to how our democracy works. Time to treat it accordingly.