2024: The Year Our Party System Finally Broke – UK Politics Podcast on Britain Votes 2024, Labour Landslide, Conservative Collapse, Reform & Greens Rise, and Westminster Turmoil

News

2024: The year our party system finally broke? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 118

5 Dec 2025

This week we spotlight our new book Britain Votes 2024, featuring research by leading political scientists such as public opinion expert Professor Sir John Curtice. We explore how Labour secured a landslide on just a third of the vote, why the election broke so many records, and what these reveal about the fragility of UK democracy. We also cover the Budget fallout, the role of the Treasury Committee in the appointment of the new head of the OBR, more backbench dissent, ex-MPs shifting to the Greens and Reform, and a brewing row over delayed mayoral elections.

LISTEN

This week we focus on the Hansard Society’s new book, Britain Votes 2024, which brings together a powerhouse team of leading political scientists - including Professors Sir John Curtice, Phil Cowley and Tim Bale - and many other distinguished experts to dissect every facet of a record-breaking general election. The 2024 contest delivered the largest post-war swing, a Labour landslide, and the Conservatives’ lowest-ever parliamentary representation. This volume, a special edition of our Parliamentary Affairs journal, explains how and why such a dramatic turnaround came about.

We talk to the editors Alistair Clark, Louise Thompson and Stuart Wilks-Hee to unpack how Labour won a landslide on just a third of the vote, why the 2024 contest shattered so many electoral records, and what this says about the resilience – or fragility – of UK democracy. We explore the extraordinary disproportionality of the result, the historically low turnout, and the sense of voters “fishing around” for alternatives in a system under strain.

This week we also discuss another turbulent week in Westminster, from the Budget fallout and the sudden resignation of OBR chair Richard Hughes to the unusual constitutional power Parliament holds over his post via the Treasury Committee. We explore the politics of abstention versus rebellion inside a government with a huge majority, and what to expect as the Finance Bill and a separate National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pension Contributions) Bill reach Parliament before Christmas.

We also examine the afterlives of ex-MPs: Lloyd Russell-Moyle’s move from Labour to the Greens, the flow of former Conservatives into Reform, and what these shifts say about deeper tensions on the right. Plus, we dig into a row over local democracy as the government delays new mayoral elections in parts of Sussex, Essex, Norfolk, Suffolk and Hampshire, prompting cross-party accusations that Labour is “cancelling democracy” and confusion about whether other local contests will still go ahead.

← Back to Parliament Matters homepage

Listen on our YouTube channel (captioned)

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Our guests

Professor Alistair Clark

Professor Alistair Clark

Alistair is Professor of Political Science at Newcastle University, where he teaches modules on Parliamentary Studies, UK Political Parties and Elections, and Public Policy. His research focuses on electoral integrity and administration, standards in public life, political parties, and devolution. He is co-editor of Parliamentary Affairs, the Hansard Society’s journal, and author of Political Parties in the UK (Palgrave). He is frequently invited to give evidence to parliamentary committees and in 2021 served as an adviser to the House of Commons Standards Committee during its review of the MPs’ Code of Conduct and in 2019 he was an adviser to the Scottish Parliament’s Finance and Constitution Committee in its scrutiny of the Referendums (Scotland) Bill. Alistair’s other editorial work includes co-editing the European Consortium for Political Research Political Data Yearbook (2018–2022) and serving as deputy editor of the British Journal of Politics and International Relations (2009–2015). He has also been a trustee and executive member of the UK Political Studies Association.

Dr Louise Thompson

Dr Louise Thompson

Louise is a Senior Lecturer in Politics at the University of Manchester, where she teaches modules on Parliamentary Studies, Contemporary Issues in Politics and Law, and Research Methods in Politics. Her own research focuses on the UK Parliament, with a particular focus on the legislative process, committees, political parties, and public engagement. As well as co-editing the Hansard Society’s Parliamentary Affairs journal, she is co-editor of the textbook Exploring Parliament (OUP, 2025) and the author or co-author of seven other books, including The End of the Small Party? Change UK and the Challenges of Parliamentary Politics (2020) and Making British Law: Committees in Action (2015). In 2022, she was an adviser on the BBC Radio 4 political drama Whipped, and in 2024–2025 she served as a UK Parliament POST Academic Fellow with the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. She has also held leadership roles within the discipline, including Academic Secretary to the Study of Parliament Group (2018–2022) and convenor of the Political Studies Association’s Parliaments Specialist Group (2014–2019).

Professor Stuart Wilks-Heeg

Professor Stuart Wilks-Heeg

Stuart is recognised as a leading expert on the UK democratic process, particularly with regard to issues associated with the mechanics of the electoral process. He served as Special Adviser to the House of Lords Select Committee reviewing the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013. He joined the University of Liverpool in 2002 as a Lecturer in Social Policy, became a Senior Lecturer in 2010, and moved to the Department of Politics in 2014, where he served as Head of Department from 2014 to 2017. He was appointed Reader in Politics in 2014 and promoted to Professor of Politics in 2022. A regular commentator on UK politics, Stuart provides analysis for regional, national, and international newspapers and broadcasters, and writes for several leading political blogs.

Resources

Britain Votes 2024: The 2024 UK General Election (Oxford University Press)

Transcript

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

Intro: [00:00:00] You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.

Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy.

And coming up this week.

Ruth Fox: The budget ramifications continue to ramificate, as the boss of the budget watchdog departs.

Mark D'Arcy: The lowliness of the ex-MP, why the casualties of last year's general election keep showing up in other political parties.

Ruth Fox: And we've got a new book out. No, not Mark and I, but the Hansard Society, looking back at the 2024 electoral earthquake, just in time for Christmas. The ideal gift for the election nerd in your family.

Mark D'Arcy: And Ruth, we've gotta start really with the scandal that's still rolling forward. A week on from last week's budget, the departure of [00:01:00] the head of the Office for Budget Responsibility. The budget watchdog that's supposed to keep the Chancellor's statistics properly kosher, has not ended all the controversy around the pre leaking of the OBR's assessment of Rachel Reeves' latest production. Full transcript →

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

Apple

YouTube Podcasts

Spotify

More ways to subscribe

Parliament Matters homepage

Latest / Highlights

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 16-20 March 2026

The Defence Secretary, John Healey, will face questions from MPs. The Grenfell Tower (Memorial Expenditure) Bill and the Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Bill will be fast-tracked through all their Commons stages in a single day. MPs will debate online safety, an e-petition calling for automatic by-elections when MPs defect to another party, and the Conservative Party will choose the Opposition Day debate. The Justice Committee will hear from the Victims’ Commissioner on the Courts and Tribunals Bill, the Public Accounts Committee will question officials about the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster, and experts will give evidence on the Representation of the People Bill. In the Lords, Peers will continue scrutiny of the Crime and Policing, Pensions Schemes, and Finance (No. 2) Bills. Lord Arbuthnot will ask about Fujitsu contributing to compensation in the Post Office Horizon case, and Peers will debate terrorism, abortion, AI, and assisted dying.

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

Briefings / Last-minute powers and limited scrutiny: Parliament and the risks of consigning online safety law to delegated legislation

Two late-stage government amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill would grant Ministers significant powers to reshape key parts of the Online Safety Act through delegated legislation. While the policy goals may attract support, the method raises serious constitutional concerns about parliamentary scrutiny and accountability. Using these amendments as a case study, this briefing explores the risks of relying on regulations to make policy and explains how the Hansard Society’s proposed reforms to the delegated legislation scrutiny system could better balance governmental flexibility with democratic oversight.

News / Is the assisted dying bill being filibustered? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 135

Debate over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been so slow in the House of Lords that opponents of the Bill are accused of deliberately running down the clock. Conservative Peer Lord Harper rejects claims of filibustering, arguing that Peers are undertaking necessary scrutiny of a flawed and complex bill. He contends the legislation lacks adequate safeguards and was unsuited to the Private Member’s Bill process and discusses whether MPs might attempt to revive it in a future parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

Blog / The Backbench Business Committee 15 years on: Has it given backbench MPs a stronger voice in the House of Commons?

Fifteen years after its creation, the Backbench Business Committee has become an important mechanism through which MPs can secure debates and raise issues in the House of Commons. Drawing on new research analysing debate transcripts and interviews with MPs, Ministers and officials, this blogpost analyses the Committee’s impact on parliamentary agenda-setting and cross-party campaigning. It highlights how the Committee has transformed opportunities for backbenchers while identifying ongoing challenges around participation, transparency and the Committee’s potential role in representing backbench interests more broadly.