News

Mandelson, Andrew and Epstein: Should there be parliamentary committee of inquiry? A conversation with Tom Tugendhat MP - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 133

28 Feb 2026
Image © House of Commons
Image © House of Commons

After the Greens’ Gorton and Denton by-election win, we assess the fallout: pressure on the Prime Minister, possible party-switching, shifting alliances, and whether mainstream parties’ sub-30% vote share could revive electoral reform. Tom Tugendhat MP calls for a parliamentary “super-committee” to probe the Mandelson–Mountbatten-Windsor saga. Plus: Speaker drama over Mandelson’s arrest, and looming battles over the Spring Statement and billions in public spending.

Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

After the Greens’ triumph at the Gorton and Denton by-election we ponder the implications for Parliament. Could the result tempt more MPs to switch parties? Does this heap fresh pressure on the Prime Minister? Will party leaders need to rethink how they treat opponents whose backing they may need after the next election? And with the three largest parties in Parliament securing less than 30% per cent of the vote in the by-election between them, could it spark a move to introduce electoral reform?

As the controversy surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor rolls on, Conservative MP and former Security Minister Tom Tugendhat joins the podcast. He makes the case for a new parliamentary “super-committee” to investigate what went wrong, from the former Prince’s appointment as a trade envoy to Mandelson’s move to Washington, and to consider how better to protect the constitutional monarchy from future embarrassment.

Plus, Ruth and Mark can’t resist dissecting the extraordinary chain of events that saw Mr Speaker Hoyle and his Lords counterpart, Lord Forsyth, unexpectedly caught up in the arrest of Lord Mandelson.

And with the Chancellor’s Spring Statement due in the coming week, as well as a series of votes to authorise billions of pounds in public spending, a lot of senior MPs have serious concerns about where the money is going in a series of government departments. So will Ministers face tough questioning during the coming Estimates Day debates or will the money be quietly voted through? Watch this space.

Watch on our YouTube channel (captioned)

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Our guest

Tom Tugendhat MP. House of Commons

Rt Hon Tom Tugendhat MBE VR MP

Tom Tugendhat MP

Tom Tugendhat is the Conservative MP for Tonbridge, having been first elected to Parliament in 2015. He was chair of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee from 2017 until 2022, when he was appointed Minister for Security at the Home Office and became a Privy Counsellor. After the 2024 general election he was appointed Shadow Security Minister before returning to the backbenches in November 2024 having been defeated by Kemi Badenoch for the Conservative Party leadership. Before becoming an MP he had studied theology at the University of Bristol then took a Master’s degree in Islamic Studies at the University of Cambridge. He learnt Arabic in Yemen then became a journalist in Beirut before returning to the UK and joining the Territorial Army in 2003. He went on to serve in Afghanistan, helping to establish a National Security Council. He was appointed MBE for his service in the Territorial Army Intelligence Corps and was awarded the Volunteer Reserves Service Medal for his long service.

Resources

House of Commons Library briefings

HM Treasury

Transcript

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

Intro: [00:00:00] You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.

Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. Coming up this week.

Ruth Fox: Some by-elections you just shrug, some completely transform the political mood, so how will Gorton and Denton reverberate through Parliament?

Mark D'Arcy: Should Parliament take the lead in investigating the Mandelson, Andrew and Epstein scandal? We talk to former Security Minister Tom Tugendhat MP.

Ruth Fox: And why MPs should be paying a lot of attention to what's going on in the Ministry of Defence and other departments in next week's debate on government spending.[00:01:00]

Mark D'Arcy: But first, Ruth, the Labour Party celebrated its 126th birthday, the 126th anniversary of the great meeting in London that founded Labour, by losing one of its safest seats, Gorton and Denton, or Denton and Gorton, choose your permutation, on the outskirts of Manchester, fell not to Reform, which had been strongly predicted by a lot of people, but to the left wing competitor, the Green Party, and the results of this by-election will, I think, reverberate through Parliament and have all sorts of interesting effects. So what do you think is, first of all, the biggest effect in the Chamber?

Ruth Fox: Well, the biggest thing that strikes me is that the three main parties in Parliament, the biggest Parliamentary groups, Labour, conservatives, and Liberal Democrats got 30% of the vote between them, give or take a few extra votes for things like the Monster Raving Loonies and others.

Mark D'Arcy: So the three big parties that have dominated British politics for more than a century, between them, are now a tiny minority of the votes cast in that seat.

Ruth Fox: In that seat. And the two parties that [00:02:00] topped the polls, Greens and Reform, between them, got 70% of the vote in that by-election, but between them can't muster 20 seats in the House of Commons. Full transcript →

Subscribe to Parliament Matters

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

Apple Podcast logo

Apple

©

YouTube Podcasts

Spotify logo

Spotify

More ways to subscribe
Parliament Matters homepage

Latest / Highlights

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 23-27 March 2026

The Prime Minister will face questions from the Liaison Committee, comprising Select Committee chairs. The Conservatives will choose the topic for Tuesday’s Opposition Day debate, while the Home Secretary and the Energy and Transport Secretaries will take oral questions from MPs. The Commons will consider Lords amendments to the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, National Insurance Bill, and Victims and Courts Bill, and will continue Committee Stage scrutiny of elections legislation. In the Lords, the Pension Schemes and the Crime and Policing Bills will complete their final stages, while Peers continue scrutiny of the English Devolution Bill. MPs will also debate an e-petition on the puberty blockers trial. Select Committees will focus on child poverty, dynamic alignment, the Defence Investment Plan, energy resilience, national resilience, and Royal Mail service delivery.

22 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Who really decides Immigration Rules: Parliament or the Home Secretary? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 137

Who really controls immigration law when Ministers can rewrite key rules with minimal parliamentary scrutiny? Jonathan Featonby of the Refugee Council explains the Home Secretary’s far-reaching powers over Immigration Rules. We also discuss the Crime and Policing Bill, where amendments on AI and abortion highlight the challenges posed by rushed law-making and executive overreach. And we look ahead to the next phase of the assisted dying debate, as supporters in the House of Commons prepare for a renewed legislative push in the next parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

20 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

13 Mar 2026
Read more

Briefings / Last-minute powers and limited scrutiny: Parliament and the risks of consigning online safety law to delegated legislation

Two late-stage government amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill would grant Ministers significant powers to reshape key parts of the Online Safety Act through delegated legislation. While the policy goals may attract support, the method raises serious constitutional concerns about parliamentary scrutiny and accountability. Using these amendments as a case study, this briefing explores the risks of relying on regulations to make policy and explains how the Hansard Society’s proposed reforms to the delegated legislation scrutiny system could better balance governmental flexibility with democratic oversight.

09 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Is the assisted dying bill being filibustered? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 135

Debate over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been so slow in the House of Lords that opponents of the Bill are accused of deliberately running down the clock. Conservative Peer Lord Harper rejects claims of filibustering, arguing that Peers are undertaking necessary scrutiny of a flawed and complex bill. He contends the legislation lacks adequate safeguards and was unsuited to the Private Member’s Bill process and discusses whether MPs might attempt to revive it in a future parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

10 Mar 2026
Read more

Categories

Themes

Contact

Legal

Fundraising Regulator logo