This week's bruising Commons exchange between the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, and the man she replaced at the Treasury, Jeremy Hunt, is just the opening encounter in what promises to be a long running parliamentary battle over the state of the public finances. MPs can expect to be asked to approve extra spending Estimates in the autumn, and there'll be a Budget and a full-scale Comprehensive Spending Review as well.
But why were MPs asked to approve £1.04 trillion in extra spending in July, without ministers pointing out that they believed the departmental budgets on which the spending was based to be dangerously flawed? And why the rush to push that extra spending through before the summer holidays.... Ruth reveals the link to a Victorian decision to ensure that gentlemen MPs could start their grouse-shooting on the Glorious 12th.
Plus, the carve-up of select committee chairs between the parties has been announced, with most going to Labour, while the Conservatives will provide the chair of the Home Affairs Committee (a good vantage point from which to attack the Government on immigration) while the Lib Dems will provide the Chair of Health and Social Care (perhaps foreshadowing a cross party deal on Social Care?). And does the decision to scrap the European Scrutiny Committee mean MPs won't be able to monitor important changes in Britain's relationship with the EU?
With more than a thousand new bag-carriers set to be hired by MPs to work with them in Parliament, Ruth and Mark talk to union rep Max Freedman, who has just stepped down after 15 years chairing the Unite staff branch in Parliament about the perils and rewards of being a Westminster aide - cautioning that the reality is far from the glamour depicted in shows like the ‘West Wing’.
Max Freedman
Max Freedman was the chair of the Parliamentary and Constituency Staff Branch of Unite the Union, a trade union branch representing MPs' staff, from 2009 until 2024. In his time as Chair, the branch has dealt with issues relating to the creation of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA), and secured several wins for Members' staff, including higher redundancy payments, automatic annual uplifts in staff budgets, a commitment to equal employment benefits when moving between MPs, a 24/7 confidential staff helpline, and the creation of the Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme (ICGS).
Should the Government have informed Parliament earlier last week about its concerns with the Main Estimates?
Why was there no debate and vote on over £1 trillion of government spending?
Could the Government have taken a different approach to presentation of the Main Estimates?
Why did the Chancellor say the Main Estimates needed to be approved before the Summer recess?
What has grouse-shooting on the Glorious 12th got to do with parliamentary approval of government spending?
How can the Government address any 'black hole' in the nation's finances?
What does the carve-up of select committee chairs between the parties tell us?
Who are the potential candidates for the key committees?
How will the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives utilise their parliamentary talent: as select committee chairs or frontbench spokespeople?
Why has the European Scrutiny Committee been abolished?
How will European matters be scrutinised by MPs?
What do new staff working for new MPs need to know about Westminster?
What skills and experience do those working for an MP need?
Hansard Society
Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There are consequently minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above. Timestamps are provided at the start of each minute.
You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm. 00:00:17:10 - 00:00:55:14 Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy. Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox and I'm Mark D'Arcy. Coming up this week. Money, money, money. Rachel Reeves draws the Commons dividing lines for the coming years. Dividing the spoils. What the share out of select committee chairs tells us about politics to come. And as Westminster prepares to welcome a new generation of parliamentary bag-carriers, a veteran Commons aide reminds them this ain't the West Wing. 00:00:55:16 - 00:01:29:08 But first, Ruth, it's got to be the starting point, I suppose. Rachel Reeves, this big statement to the House about the financial legacy of the previous Conservative government was exactly as billed, really. A massive exercise in pointing the finger of blame and the blame game produced some pretty sparky exchanges with the man she replaced in the Exchequer, Jeremy Hunt, about how much Labour knew about the state of the country's books before the election, and whether or not Rachel Reeves was, in effect, preparing the ground to break some of the promises she'd made about public spending and tax cuts 00:01:29:08 - 00:01:47:19 during that campaign. Yes, 22 billion pound black hole, she claims. Now, unless you've discovered some accountancy skills in the last week that I don't know about, I don't think either of us are in a position to judge who's right and who's wrong in all of this? But it will come out in the wash because eventually they will have to settle the books. 00:01:47:19 - 00:02:08:08 Parliament will have to approve additional spending if necessary if there is this black hole. But it's a pretty serious claim. And as you said, Jeremy Hunt and Rachel Reeves had some fairly harsh clashes. Jeremy Hunt isn't exactly Mr. Ferocious. No, he's normally the kind of person who, alright, can put the dagger in, but in a very sort of parliamentarian kind of way. 00:02:08:13 - 00:02:30:07 But there was visible angst and irritation. And in the middle of the chamber here. But this is central to the politics of the coming months. Now, Labour, if it has to take nasty decisions, wants them to be very firmly blamed on the previous government, not on themselves. And they also need to prepare their troops for those nasty decisions, which will come up in all sorts of Commons votes in the coming months as well.
Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.
The UK Spending Review outlines how Government funds will be allocated over several years. Unlike the Budget, which raises revenue, the Review decides how it is spent. But how is it approved? What role does Parliament play if it doesn’t vote on the Review itself? This blog explores how the Spending Review works, how it differs from the Budget, and how Parliament holds the Government to account through the Estimates process.
On Friday 13 June, the House of Commons will once again debate the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales. Specifically, it will hold a second day of Report Stage, during which the whole House will debate and vote on amendments. This briefing explains the structure of Report Stage, what happened on the first day of Report Stage, how amendments are selected and grouped, on which amendments a decision can still be taken, and the likely sequence of events this Friday, including whether a final vote will take place.
The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves MP, will deliver a statement on the Spending Review. MPs will resume Report Stage of the assisted dying bill and debate key legislation on football governance, mental health, and planning and infrastructure. Peers and MPs are expected to resolve their standoff over AI and copyright in the Data (Use and Access) Bill. The Commons Defence Committee will hear from the lead reviewers of the Strategic Defence Review, while a Lords Committee will examine the Chagos Archipelago sovereignty issue. The Hansard Society’s Director will give evidence to the Modernisation Committee about access to the House of Commons and its procedures.
In this episode, we explore why ministers keep bypassing Parliament to make major announcements to the media — and whether returning to the Despatch Box might help clarify their message. We unpack the Lords' uphill battle to protect creators’ rights in the Data Use and Access Bill, challenge claims that the Assisted Dying Bill lacks scrutiny, and examine early findings from a Speaker’s Conference on improving security for MPs, as threats and intimidation against politicians continue to rise. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.
Our evidence on treaty scrutiny has been published by the House of Lords International Agreements Committee. Our submission outlines the problems with the existing framework for treaty scrutiny and why legislative and cultural change are needed to improve Parliament's scrutiny role. Our evidence joins calls for a parliamentary consent vote for the most significant agreements, a stronger role for Parliament in shaping negotiating mandates and monitoring progress, and a sifting committee tasked with determining which agreements warrant the greatest scrutiny.
