News

Assisted dying bill: Special series #6 - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 79

7 Mar 2025

In this sixth instalment of our special mini-podcast series, we continue to track the progress of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which seeks to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales. This episode looks into developments in the Bill Committee this week, where scrutiny of the legislation has intensified. And we speak with Professor Colin Gavaghan about how New Zealand legislated for assisted dying.

In this episode, we track the latest developments in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill Committee, where scrutiny has intensified. We discuss the pace of the Committee’s progress, the dynamics between supporters and opponents of the Bill, and a key upcoming vote on the clause which proposes shifting oversight from High Court judges to an expert panel. Could this amendment sway MPs who previously supported the Bill?

Later, we turn to New Zealand, where assisted dying has been legal for over three years. Professor Colin Gavaghan, from the University of Bristol, shares insights into New Zealand’s experience, exploring eligibility criteria, operational challenges, and the emotional toll on medical professionals. What lessons can the UK learn from their legislative approach and the assisted dying system itself.

Professor Colin Gavaghan. ©

Professor Colin Gavaghan

Colin Gavaghan is a Professor at Bristol Digital Futures Institute and at the Law School at the University of Bristol. His research interests include the analysis of legal, ethical and policy issues around new technologies, as well as medical and criminal law. He has published widely on end-of-life issues and was an expert witness in Seales v Attorney General, the leading New Zealand case on assisted dying. Formerly the first Director of the New Zealand Law Foundation Centre for Law and Policy in Emerging Technologies at the University of Otago, he was also Deputy Chair of the New Zealand’s statutory Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Colin Gavaghan

Hansard Society

Parliament

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

[00:00:00] Speaker: You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production, supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk.

[00:00:17] Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

[00:00:24] Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy and welcome to the latest in our special series of mini podcasts tracing the progress of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, the bill that aims to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales.

[00:00:37] In a moment we'll be looking at events in a jurisdiction that's had an assisted dying system for three years, New Zealand, and the lessons it might have for the system in this country. But first Ruth, there's been quite a lot of interesting action in the bill committee that's ploughing through the details of the bill at the moment.

[00:00:52] Ruth Fox: Yes, I mean the pace has quickened a bit. Notably, there have been various comments at different stages from Kim Leadbeater and others keeping an eye on the clock, almost, you know, noting that we need to make progress and so on. And I think they have made a little bit more progress than previous weeks.

[00:01:09] They're getting through things a little bit quicker, partly because it does appear as if some of the MPs who are supportive of the bill are making fewer interventions or shorter interventions. possibly to keep things moving along at a quicker pace.

[00:01:22] Mark D'Arcy: And that's a fairly classic kind of thing that happens when time is running short.

[00:01:27] The supporters of a proposition often almost disengage, let the other side make its debating points, but don't fire back at anything like the normal rate, just so that they don't take up time. It's something you often see, for example, in debates in the Commons Chamber on Private Members Bills.

[00:01:44] Ruth Fox: Yeah, I mean, it's important to stress this bill is getting more scrutiny than any recent Private Member's Bill, I can recall. And actually more scrutiny than quite a lot of Government bills, I can recall as well. So when we talk about the pressure of time and running short of time and so on, that has to be set in context. There's nothing that unusual about where we are in terms of the amount of time.

[00:02:04] But there is this pressure, obviously, of needing to meet the Friday of 25th of April to get into the next stage, Report Stage. put the bill back into the Chamber. They're mindful of that.

[00:02:16] Mark D'Arcy: And that might, for example, entail them sitting rather later than usual in the committee. Some very long sittings, 8pm or 9pm finishes to their afternoon sittings, for example.

[00:02:26] Which can get pretty gruelling for members of the committee who can be there, you know, 4, 5, 6 hours.

Subscribe to Parliament Matters

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 23-27 June 2025

MPs will debate the spending plans (Main Estimates) of six government departments and approve all departmental spending for this financial year. Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones MP will answer questions from the Treasury Committee on the Spending Review, and the Governor of the Bank of England will discuss the state of the economy with the Lords Economic Affairs Committee. Foreign Secretary David Lammy and his ministerial team will face questions from MPs in the Chamber. The Foreign Affairs Committee will hear from the Israeli opposition leader, Yair Lapid, about the conflict with Iran. There will be backbench debates on Pride Month and Armed Forces Day. And experts will be asked whether the earth is prepared for an asteroid collision.

22 Jun 2025
Read more

News / Assisted dying bill: Special series #14 - MPs back assisted dying bill in historic vote

This week, we reflect on a landmark moment in UK parliamentary history: the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has passed its Third Reading in the House of Commons, moving one step closer to legalising assisted dying in England and Wales. We are joined once again by former House of Commons Clerk Paul Evans to examine how this Private Member’s Bill navigated the political and procedural obstacles in its path and to explore what lies ahead in the House of Lords. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

21 Jun 2025
Read more

Guides / How does Parliament approve Government spending? A procedural guide to the Estimates process

In order to incur expenditure the Government needs to obtain approval from Parliament for its departmental spending plans. The annual Estimates cycle is the means by which the House of Commons controls the Government’s plans for the spending of money raised through taxation.

16 Jan 2023
Read more

Blog / What role does Parliament play in the Spending Review?

The UK Spending Review outlines how Government funds will be allocated over several years. Unlike the Budget, which raises revenue, the Review decides how it is spent. But how is it approved? What role does Parliament play if it doesn’t vote on the Review itself? This blog explores how the Spending Review works, how it differs from the Budget, and how Parliament holds the Government to account through the Estimates process.

09 Jun 2025
Read more

Submissions / Parliamentary scrutiny of treaties - Our evidence to the House of Lords International Agreements Committee

Our evidence on treaty scrutiny has been published by the House of Lords International Agreements Committee. Our submission outlines the problems with the existing framework for treaty scrutiny and why legislative and cultural change are needed to improve Parliament's scrutiny role. Our evidence joins calls for a parliamentary consent vote for the most significant agreements, a stronger role for Parliament in shaping negotiating mandates and monitoring progress, and a sifting committee tasked with determining which agreements warrant the greatest scrutiny.

03 Jun 2025
Read more