Coming on top of the controversial introduction of the concept of ‘retained EU law’ in the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018, the provisions for an implementation / transition period in the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement pose challenges for UK law that the promised Withdrawal Agreement Bill will need to address, including through amendments to the 2018 Act.

In this May 2019 paper, Swee Leng Harris – Head of Policy and Public Affairs at The Legal Education Foundation, and a member of the Bingham Centre’s Expert Working Group on the EU (Withdrawal) Bill and the Rule of Law – first considers ‘retained EU law’ as a new category of UK law in terms of legal and constitutional status. The paper then makes observations about the constitutional and legal significance of implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement treaty in the promised Withdrawal Agreement Bill (WAB). Finally, the paper identifies necessary amendments to the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EU(W)A) to accommodate an implementation / transition period and to ensure legal certainty on retained EU law in UK law.

The paper draws a number of conclusions regarding retained EU law and legislative changes needed to accommodate an implementation / transition period and promote legal certainty:

  • Retained EU law needs to be understood in the round, including the constitutional provisions for retained EU law in the EU(W)A, changes made to retained EU law through secondary (or delegated) legislation, and other primary Brexit-related legislation affecting retained EU law.
  • The WAB will likely replicate the effect of the European Communities Act 1972 to apply EU law in the UK for the implementation / transition period.
  • EU law will develop and change during the implementation / transition period, and the WAB will need to enable those changes in EU law to be reflected in UK law.
  • The WAB should also amend the EU(W)A so that new or modified EU laws that apply in the UK through the WAB during implementation / transition form part of retained EU law.
  • Consequential amendments will be needed to enable retention of EU law under sections 2 and 4 of the EU(W)A if the ECA is to be repealed on exit day (at the beginning of the implementation / transition period) while the snapshot of EU law is to be taken on ‘retention day’ (at the end of the implementation / transition period).

The paper builds on the author’s April 2018 paper ‘Legislating for transition / implementation: implications for the EU (Withdrawal) Bill’, also published by the Hansard Society, and develops the issues/arguments raised therein.

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

Liz Truss, UK Government Foreign Secretary
blog / 21.01.22

Back to the future? House of Commons scrutiny of EU affairs after Lord Frost’s exit

The recent rearrangement of responsibilities for the government’s handling of EU-related affairs raises questions about future parliamentary scrutiny of these issues. In some respects pre-2016 institutional arrangements are restored, but the post-Brexit landscape presents new scrutiny challenges which thus far MPs have not confronted.

Back to the future? House of Commons scrutiny of EU affairs after Lord Frost’s exit
Palace of Westminster, Houses of Parliament, at dusk
blog / 14.01.22

Living on a prayer (motion): How do parliamentarians debate ‘made negative’ Statutory Instruments?

A recent House of Lords debate on a ‘made negative’ Statutory Instrument highlights Peers’ greater appetite and ability to secure such debates compared to MPs. Data on debate lengths suggests parliamentarians are more likely to give more meaningful scrutiny to SIs they wish to debate than those on which they are obliged to spend time by current procedures.

Living on a prayer (motion): How do parliamentarians debate ‘made negative’ Statutory Instruments?
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, the Rt Hon Sajid Javid MP, making a statement to the House of Commons updating Members on Covid-19, 8 December 2021 (©) House of Commons / Jessica Taylor
publications / briefings / 2021

What Covid Regulations might MPs be asked to debate on 14 December and how will the Regulations be approved?

What Covid Regulations will the House of Commons debate on 14 December, and how? Amid backbench unrest, the occasion will be shaped by the interplay between delegated legislation scrutiny, parliamentary procedures, and raw politics. The outcome could have profound consequences for both public health policy and the Prime Minister’s position.

What Covid Regulations might MPs be asked to debate on 14 December and how will the Regulations be approved?
Photo of an HGV
blog / 03.12.21

In it for the long haul: HGV driver shortage Statutory Instruments show scrutiny system shortcomings

Statutory Instruments (SIs) have been a key tool in the government’s response to shortages of heavy goods vehicle (HGV) drivers. These SIs showcase the usefulness of this type of law-making but also highlight again some of the longstanding problems with its parliamentary scrutiny.

In it for the long haul: HGV driver shortage Statutory Instruments show scrutiny system shortcomings
Prev
Next