Coming on top of the controversial introduction of the concept of ‘retained EU law’ in the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018, the provisions for an implementation / transition period in the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement pose challenges for UK law that the promised Withdrawal Agreement Bill will need to address, including through amendments to the 2018 Act.

In this May 2019 paper, Swee Leng Harris – Head of Policy and Public Affairs at The Legal Education Foundation, and a member of the Bingham Centre’s Expert Working Group on the EU (Withdrawal) Bill and the Rule of Law – first considers ‘retained EU law’ as a new category of UK law in terms of legal and constitutional status. The paper then makes observations about the constitutional and legal significance of implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement treaty in the promised Withdrawal Agreement Bill (WAB). Finally, the paper identifies necessary amendments to the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EU(W)A) to accommodate an implementation / transition period and to ensure legal certainty on retained EU law in UK law.

The paper draws a number of conclusions regarding retained EU law and legislative changes needed to accommodate an implementation / transition period and promote legal certainty:

  • Retained EU law needs to be understood in the round, including the constitutional provisions for retained EU law in the EU(W)A, changes made to retained EU law through secondary (or delegated) legislation, and other primary Brexit-related legislation affecting retained EU law.
  • The WAB will likely replicate the effect of the European Communities Act 1972 to apply EU law in the UK for the implementation / transition period.
  • EU law will develop and change during the implementation / transition period, and the WAB will need to enable those changes in EU law to be reflected in UK law.
  • The WAB should also amend the EU(W)A so that new or modified EU laws that apply in the UK through the WAB during implementation / transition form part of retained EU law.
  • Consequential amendments will be needed to enable retention of EU law under sections 2 and 4 of the EU(W)A if the ECA is to be repealed on exit day (at the beginning of the implementation / transition period) while the snapshot of EU law is to be taken on ‘retention day’ (at the end of the implementation / transition period).

The paper builds on the author’s April 2018 paper ‘Legislating for transition / implementation: implications for the EU (Withdrawal) Bill’, also published by the Hansard Society, and develops the issues/arguments raised therein.

Enjoy reading this? Please consider sharing it

Latest

Theresa May, Liaison Committee session, House of Commons
media / coverage

Select committees are crucial for holding ministers to account

The process for getting House of Commons select committees re-established after the general election is so far broadly on track. However, government reorganisation and the Labour leadership contest could yet cause delays and disruption. And this time, there are particular reasons to get committees into place urgently.

Select committees are crucial for holding ministers to account
Houses of Parliament aerial view
journal

Parliamentary Affairs (vol 73, issue 1, 2020)

Articles in this latest edition cover topics as diverse as political finance regulation, devolution, young people and the EU referendum, candidate campaigning in general elections, the policisation of abortion and the electoral success of women candidates, as well as reflections on the Turkish, Australian, Irish and EU Parliaments.

Parliamentary Affairs (vol 73, issue 1, 2020)
School pupils in an assembly with their hands up.
blog / 07.01.20

2019 Mock Elections: Higher turnout and different outcome than the real general election

Schools making up an ‘electorate’ of over 46,000 young people returned their results to the Hansard Society’s 2019 Mock Elections, which were held to coincide with the December general election and continued a series extending back over 50 years. Labour emerged as the clear ‘winner’ of the 2019 mock poll.

2019 Mock Elections: Higher turnout and different outcome than the real general election
The Queen's Speech during the State Opening of Parliament, October 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
publications / guides / 2019

Back to Business: procedure at the start of a new Parliament (special collection)

At the start of a new Parliament a series of ceremonies and procedures must take place before the Members of the two Houses can get down to business. Our special collection of procedural guides takes you through them, in the order they take place. We start with some things to note about the highly unusual start of the 2019 Parliament.

Back to Business: procedure at the start of a new Parliament (special collection)
A House of Commons Clerk holds out the Affirmation for a newly elected Member of Parliament to read (2010), © UK Parliament/Catherine Bebbington (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
publications / guides / 2019

Lifecycle of a Parliament

A set of laws, conventions and Standing Orders govern how and when a Parliament starts and ends, how it is divided into sessions and sitting periods, and what ceremonies and procedures take place at different points. This guide takes you through them.

Lifecycle of a Parliament
The Royal Procession during the State Opening of Parliament, October 2019 (UK Parliament / CC BY-NC 2.0)
publications / guides / 2019

Queen’s Speech and State Opening of Parliament

State Opening, with the Queen’s Speech at its centre, is the key ceremonial and constitutional event at the start of a new session of Parliament.

Queen’s Speech and State Opening of Parliament
Prev
Next