News

Parliament vs. Prince Andrew - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 111

24 Oct 2025
© Wikimedia Commons
© Wikimedia Commons

This week, we explore how far Parliament can go in holding members of the Royal Family to account, as pressure grows for MPs to scrutinise Prince Andrew’s finances and royal titles. We ask whether Nigel Farage should get a right of reply at Prime Minister’s Questions amid his growing prominence, and examine Labour’s reshuffle of select committee posts and calls for greater transparency in how they’re filled. Plus, a look back at the rebuilding of the House of Commons Chamber, 75 years after its postwar reopening.

Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

Normally Parliament steers clear of discussing the Royal Family but with Prince Andrew embroiled in the scandal around the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, there are increasing calls for MPs to act. Could he be called before a select committee to explain his finances and the arrangements around his Royal Lodge home in Windsor Great Park? Might Parliament legislate to strip him of his titles and his role as a Counsellor of State? Could he be removed from the line of succession to the Throne? To explore these issues Ruth and Mark are joined by Dr Craig Prescott of Royal Holloway, University of London, an expert on the modern monarchy.

With other party leaders increasingly using Prime Minister’s Question Time to take potshots at Nigel Farage, does the Reform UK party leader deserve some kind of right of reply during PMQs? The problem is that while he may have a commanding lead in the opinion polls, he leads a tiny contingent of MPs so giving him a regular slot, ahead of other parties with as many, or even more MPs could create more problems than it solves. But as Ruth and Mark discuss, he does have other options for hitting back at his critics.

There’s also movement on the select committee corridor as Labour MPs elect new members to fill vacancies left by those promoted in the recent government reshuffle. But questions remain about the process itself. Should there be greater transparency around how parties decide who sits on these influential committees? We weigh the calls for reform against the realities of party politics behind the scenes.

Finally, this month marks 75 years since the Commons Chamber re-opened after being destroyed in the Blitz. We speak to Dr Eloise Donnelly, Curator of Parliament’s Historic Furniture and Decorative Art, about how the reconstruction balanced modernisation with tradition under the direction of architect Giles Gilbert Scott. From a 15-year-old apprentice carving the Speaker’s Chair to German prisoners of war quarrying the stone, the story of the rebuild is one of craftsmanship, controversy and continuity.

At the heart of a new exhibition marking the anniversary is a remarkable architectural scale model of the postwar Chamber — built in 1944 to help MPs visualise the design, exhibited across the country, lost for decades, but then rediscovered in Parliament. As Ruth reveals, this long-missing model solves a small but fascinating mystery in the Hansard Society’s own history.

Dr Craig Prescott. ©

Dr Craig Prescott

Dr Craig Prescott

Craig is a specialist in UK Constitutional Law, primarily focusing on the constitutional and political role of the monarchy, Parliament and constitutional reform. His latest book, Modern Monarchy, will be published by Agenda Publishing. Craig frequently appears in the media to discuss royal, constitutional, and political matters. He was part of the BBC team that covered the Coronation of Charles III. He has appeared in all the national newspapers in the UK, as well as BBC, SKY, and key outlets in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Brazil, and the United States. He is also interested in Sports Law and has taught this subject at several institutions.

©

Dr Eloise Donnelly

Dr Eloise Donnelly

Eloise is Curator of Historic Furniture and Decorative Art at the Houses of Parliament. She curates a collection of 11,000 objects dating from the 17th century to the 1990s, many of which are still in use on the parliamentary estate today. Prior to joining Parliament in 2023 she was a curator of 19th century metalwork and ceramics at the V&A Museum, and has a PhD from the University of Cambridge on the art market and growth of museum collections in the 19th century.

How the House of Commons Chamber was rebuilt after the Second World War:

Parliament and Prince Andrew

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

Intro: [00:00:00] You are listening to Parliament Matters. A Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.

Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. Coming up this week.

Ruth Fox: What, if anything, can Parliament do about Prince Andrew?

Mark D'Arcy: Is PMQs unfair to Nigel Farage?

Ruth Fox: And 75 years after the bombed out Chamber of the House of Commons was restored, the tangled tale of what happened to the architect's model of the new look home for MPs, which is now back on display in Parliament.

Mark D'Arcy: But first Parliament normally tiptoes around the royals, but the [00:01:00] case of Prince Andrew seems to have overridden their normal discretion.

Ruth Fox: Fresh revelations in the last week about Prince Andrew's alleged links with convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, are changing the terms of engagement. There's a bill to strip him of his titles from the MP for York, Rachael Maskell.

There's talk of a Public Accounts Committee inquiry into the lease he has with the Crown Estate for his home at Royal Lodge and Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey used Prime Minister's Questions this week to suggest that the Prince himself should be summoned before a select committee to give evidence.

Mark D'Arcy: But how realistic is any of this? What can Parliament do about Prince Andrew? We turn to Dr. Craig Prescott of Royal Holloway University of London, who's an expert on the constitutional and political aspects of the Royal Family and who's currently writing a book about the modern monarchy. And I began by asking him about the traditional restrictions Parliament has on debating the actions of the royals.

Subscribe to Parliament Matters

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 23-27 March 2026

The Prime Minister will face questions from the Liaison Committee, comprising Select Committee chairs. The Conservatives will choose the topic for Tuesday’s Opposition Day debate, while the Home Secretary and the Energy and Transport Secretaries will take oral questions from MPs. The Commons will consider Lords amendments to the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, National Insurance Bill, and Victims and Courts Bill, and will continue Committee Stage scrutiny of elections legislation. In the Lords, the Pension Schemes and the Crime and Policing Bills will complete their final stages, while Peers continue scrutiny of the English Devolution Bill. MPs will also debate an e-petition on the puberty blockers trial. Select Committees will focus on child poverty, dynamic alignment, the Defence Investment Plan, energy resilience, national resilience, and Royal Mail service delivery.

22 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Who really decides Immigration Rules: Parliament or the Home Secretary? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 137

Who really controls immigration law when Ministers can rewrite key rules with minimal parliamentary scrutiny? Jonathan Featonby of the Refugee Council explains the Home Secretary’s far-reaching powers over Immigration Rules. We also discuss the Crime and Policing Bill, where amendments on AI and abortion highlight the challenges posed by rushed law-making and executive overreach. And we look ahead to the next phase of the assisted dying debate, as supporters in the House of Commons prepare for a renewed legislative push in the next parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

20 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

13 Mar 2026
Read more

Briefings / Last-minute powers and limited scrutiny: Parliament and the risks of consigning online safety law to delegated legislation

Two late-stage government amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill would grant Ministers significant powers to reshape key parts of the Online Safety Act through delegated legislation. While the policy goals may attract support, the method raises serious constitutional concerns about parliamentary scrutiny and accountability. Using these amendments as a case study, this briefing explores the risks of relying on regulations to make policy and explains how the Hansard Society’s proposed reforms to the delegated legislation scrutiny system could better balance governmental flexibility with democratic oversight.

09 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Is the assisted dying bill being filibustered? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 135

Debate over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been so slow in the House of Lords that opponents of the Bill are accused of deliberately running down the clock. Conservative Peer Lord Harper rejects claims of filibustering, arguing that Peers are undertaking necessary scrutiny of a flawed and complex bill. He contends the legislation lacks adequate safeguards and was unsuited to the Private Member’s Bill process and discusses whether MPs might attempt to revive it in a future parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

10 Mar 2026
Read more