News

Parliament vs. Prince Andrew - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 111

24 Oct 2025
© Wikimedia Commons
© Wikimedia Commons

This week, we explore how far Parliament can go in holding members of the Royal Family to account, as pressure grows for MPs to scrutinise Prince Andrew’s finances and royal titles. We ask whether Nigel Farage should get a right of reply at Prime Minister’s Questions amid his growing prominence, and examine Labour’s reshuffle of select committee posts and calls for greater transparency in how they’re filled. Plus, a look back at the rebuilding of the House of Commons Chamber, 75 years after its postwar reopening.

Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

Normally Parliament steers clear of discussing the Royal Family but with Prince Andrew embroiled in the scandal around the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, there are increasing calls for MPs to act. Could he be called before a select committee to explain his finances and the arrangements around his Royal Lodge home in Windsor Great Park? Might Parliament legislate to strip him of his titles and his role as a Counsellor of State? Could he be removed from the line of succession to the Throne? To explore these issues Ruth and Mark are joined by Dr Craig Prescott of Royal Holloway, University of London, an expert on the modern monarchy.

With other party leaders increasingly using Prime Minister’s Question Time to take potshots at Nigel Farage, does the Reform UK party leader deserve some kind of right of reply during PMQs? The problem is that while he may have a commanding lead in the opinion polls, he leads a tiny contingent of MPs so giving him a regular slot, ahead of other parties with as many, or even more MPs could create more problems than it solves. But as Ruth and Mark discuss, he does have other options for hitting back at his critics.

There’s also movement on the select committee corridor as Labour MPs elect new members to fill vacancies left by those promoted in the recent government reshuffle. But questions remain about the process itself. Should there be greater transparency around how parties decide who sits on these influential committees? We weigh the calls for reform against the realities of party politics behind the scenes.

Finally, this month marks 75 years since the Commons Chamber re-opened after being destroyed in the Blitz. We speak to Dr Eloise Donnelly, Curator of Parliament’s Historic Furniture and Decorative Art, about how the reconstruction balanced modernisation with tradition under the direction of architect Giles Gilbert Scott. From a 15-year-old apprentice carving the Speaker’s Chair to German prisoners of war quarrying the stone, the story of the rebuild is one of craftsmanship, controversy and continuity.

At the heart of a new exhibition marking the anniversary is a remarkable architectural scale model of the postwar Chamber — built in 1944 to help MPs visualise the design, exhibited across the country, lost for decades, but then rediscovered in Parliament. As Ruth reveals, this long-missing model solves a small but fascinating mystery in the Hansard Society’s own history.

Dr Craig Prescott. ©

Dr Craig Prescott

Dr Craig Prescott

Craig is a specialist in UK Constitutional Law, primarily focusing on the constitutional and political role of the monarchy, Parliament and constitutional reform. His latest book, Modern Monarchy, will be published by Agenda Publishing. Craig frequently appears in the media to discuss royal, constitutional, and political matters. He was part of the BBC team that covered the Coronation of Charles III. He has appeared in all the national newspapers in the UK, as well as BBC, SKY, and key outlets in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Brazil, and the United States. He is also interested in Sports Law and has taught this subject at several institutions.

©

Dr Eloise Donnelly

Dr Eloise Donnelly

Eloise is Curator of Historic Furniture and Decorative Art at the Houses of Parliament. She curates a collection of 11,000 objects dating from the 17th century to the 1990s, many of which are still in use on the parliamentary estate today. Prior to joining Parliament in 2023 she was a curator of 19th century metalwork and ceramics at the V&A Museum, and has a PhD from the University of Cambridge on the art market and growth of museum collections in the 19th century.

How the House of Commons Chamber was rebuilt after the Second World War:

Parliament and Prince Andrew

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

Intro: [00:00:00] You are listening to Parliament Matters. A Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.

Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. Coming up this week.

Ruth Fox: What, if anything, can Parliament do about Prince Andrew?

Mark D'Arcy: Is PMQs unfair to Nigel Farage?

Ruth Fox: And 75 years after the bombed out Chamber of the House of Commons was restored, the tangled tale of what happened to the architect's model of the new look home for MPs, which is now back on display in Parliament.

Mark D'Arcy: But first Parliament normally tiptoes around the royals, but the [00:01:00] case of Prince Andrew seems to have overridden their normal discretion.

Ruth Fox: Fresh revelations in the last week about Prince Andrew's alleged links with convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, are changing the terms of engagement. There's a bill to strip him of his titles from the MP for York, Rachael Maskell.

There's talk of a Public Accounts Committee inquiry into the lease he has with the Crown Estate for his home at Royal Lodge and Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey used Prime Minister's Questions this week to suggest that the Prince himself should be summoned before a select committee to give evidence.

Mark D'Arcy: But how realistic is any of this? What can Parliament do about Prince Andrew? We turn to Dr. Craig Prescott of Royal Holloway University of London, who's an expert on the constitutional and political aspects of the Royal Family and who's currently writing a book about the modern monarchy. And I began by asking him about the traditional restrictions Parliament has on debating the actions of the royals.

Subscribe to Parliament Matters

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 20-24 October 2025

MPs will focus on the Bill to implement the UK–Mauritius Treaty transferring sovereignty over the Chagos Islands, the Sentencing Bill, and the Renters’ Rights Bill which is expected to be sent for Royal Assent. They will also discuss Scottish devolution and Black History Month, while the Northern Ireland Secretary gives evidence on the Windsor Framework and the legacy of the Troubles. In the Lords, the new Select Committee to consider the assisted dying bill begins its work. Peers will also examine the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, the Fraud Recovery Bill, and the Deprivation of Citizenship Orders Bill. They will hear from the Bank of England Governor, and consider the proposed suspension of former Lord Speaker, Baroness D’Souza.

19 Oct 2025
Read more

News / Parliament’s spying scandal: Why was the China case dropped? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 110

It’s been a tumultuous week in Westminster, with three ministerial statements on the China spying case and fresh questions about the collapse of charges against two alleged spies. We are joined by Cambridge public law expert Professor Mark Elliott to untangle the legal and political fallout, from espionage claims inside MPs’ offices to confusion over whether China was ever designated an “enemy state.” We also explore looming government challenges — the Budget, Afghan data leak, local election setbacks — and the membership of the new Select Committee to consider the assisted dying legislation in the House of Lords. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

17 Oct 2025
Read more

Briefings / Assisted dying - The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: Rolling news

Stay informed with updates and analysis on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill as it moves through Parliament. Learn about the debates, procedures, decisions, and key milestones shaping the assisted dying legislation.

15 May 2025
Read more

News / What are the Usual Channels? A short history of Westminster whipping - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 108

In this episode, we talk to political journalist Seb Whale about his new book, The Usual Channels, which reveals the hidden world of Westminster’s whips. Seb charts how party discipline has evolved – from the stormy politics of the 1970s and the Maastricht battles of the 1990s to the legendary “black book,” the Brexit showdowns and the short-lived Liz Truss premiership. He explains how the whips’ office has adapted to a modern Parliament – especially with the influx of women MPs – and why, even today, whips still wield decisive influence over MPs’ careers and remain indispensable despite the pressures of contemporary politics. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

26 Sep 2025
Read more

Blog / Treaty scrutiny: addressing the accountability gap

In this guest blog, Lord Goldsmith KC, Chair of the House of Lords International Agreements Committee (IAC), sets out the findings of the Committee’s latest report urging reform of Parliament's outdated system for scrutinising treaties. The report warns that Westminster lags behind other legislatures in overseeing these vital policy instruments. Rejecting successive governments' defence of the status quo, it argues that government objections to reform are unconvincing and meaningful accountability is overdue.

23 Sep 2025
Read more