News

A Humble Address: How MPs confronted the Mandelson scandal - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 130

6 Feb 2026
Image © UK Embassy to USA / House of Commons
Image © UK Embassy to USA / House of Commons

It has been a bruising week for the Prime Minister after the House of Commons backed a Conservative “Humble Address” demanding documents on Sir Keir Starmer’s vetting of Lord Mandelson for the Washington Ambassadorship. We explain how the procedure works, what role the Intelligence and Security Committee may play in decisions on disclosure, and how legislation to strip a peerage could be introduced. Plus, the latest on the Restoration and Renewal of Parliament as yet another report lands with a new set of costings.

Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

The humble address – a procedural device revived by Sir Keir Starmer himself during the Brexit years – operates like a “parliamentary can-opener”, and in this case sharply intensified the pressure on the Prime Minister as Labour MPs signalled support for the Conservative Party's motion.

We unpack the debate’s twists and turns, including a manuscript amendment that called for Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee to be involved in assessing the Government’s proposed national security redactions after MPs warned the government’s original plan of leaving it to the Cabinet Secretary looked like “marking your own homework”.

We explain how the Intelligence and Security Committee says the disclosure process should work. We also examine how police interest may complicate publication and ask whether the “traitorous” language used in the Commons about Lord Mandelson could have consequences if any criminal proceedings follow. Then we examine the thorny constitutional problem of revoking a peerage, contrast it with removal from the Privy Council, and consider whether legislation could open the door to future political misuse.

Finally, we turn to the latest Restoration and Renewal report on the crumbling Palace of Westminster – yet another “Groundhog Day” moment – setting out the familiar conclusion that full decant remains the fastest, safest, and most cost-effective option, and discuss why the politicians will hesitate over the eye-watering numbers and the politics of moving out.

Watch on our YouTube channel (captioned)

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Resources

Transcript

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

Intro: [00:00:00] You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.

Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. And coming up this week.

Ruth Fox: Power, plutocracy, pimping and peerages.

Mark D'Arcy: Should there be a way to defrock errant peers?

Ruth Fox: And groundhog day in the ongoing saga of how and when to save Parliament's crumbling buildings.

Mark D'Arcy: And Ruth, what a week it's been. This has been the week so far of Peter Mandelson in Parliament, and not in a good way. Peter Mandelson, the twice resigned cabinet minister, forced to resign again as [00:01:00] Britain's Ambassador to Washington. Let me correct myself. He didn't resign for the third time. He was in fact sacked, but there's three top level jobs that he's lost during his long career.

Peter Mandelson has been causing all sorts of difficulties for Sir Keir Starmer's government. Should they have appointed someone who turned out to have close links to the paedophile and financier, Jeffrey Epstein. Should he have been more closely scrutinised? Should he not have been given the job at all? What did Sir Keir Starmer know about his relationship with Epstein and when did he know it? Full transcript →

Subscribe to Parliament Matters

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

Apple Podcast logo

Apple

©

YouTube Podcasts

Spotify logo

Spotify

More ways to subscribe
Parliament Matters homepage

Latest / Highlights

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 13-16 April 2026

Ministerial Statements are expected on developments during the recess, particularly in the Middle East and on Russian submarine activity. The English Devolution Bill completes its final Lords stages, while legislative “ping-pong” continues on the Pension Schemes, Victims and Courts, Crime and Policing, and Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bills. MPs scrutinising the Courts and Tribunals Bill will examine proposals to restrict jury trials. In the Lords, two bills – on the Grenfell Tower Memorial and ministerial salaries – will be fast-tracked through all stages in a single day. MPs will debate SEND reform, statutory menstrual leave, children’s safeguarding, and accessibility in the House of Commons. The Lords will consider changes to Immigration Rules and access rights for departing hereditary peers. Chloe Mawson becomes the first woman to serve as Clerk of the Parliaments. And the Treasury Committee will hold an appointment hearing with the new chief executive of the Prudential Regulatory Authority.

12 Apr 2026
Read more

News / Will key Government bills pass by the end of the parliamentary Session? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 138

With the King’s Speech set for 13 May, attention turns to the end of the current parliamentary Session and the frantic “wash-up” period before prorogation, likely in late April. We assess which Bills can still make it through in the remaining sitting days. With major Lords amendments on issues including revenge porn, social media access for under-16s, court transcripts and AI safety, Ministers face intense pressure and possible concessions. We also examine the political stakes around the Chagos Islands Bill and the stalled Hillsborough Law. The episode also answers listener questions on parliamentary procedure and reform, before exploring the sharp rise in Written Parliamentary Questions and what it means for effective scrutiny in Westminster. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

27 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Who really decides Immigration Rules: Parliament or the Home Secretary? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 137

Who really controls immigration law when Ministers can rewrite key rules with minimal parliamentary scrutiny? Jonathan Featonby of the Refugee Council explains the Home Secretary’s far-reaching powers over Immigration Rules. We also discuss the Crime and Policing Bill, where amendments on AI and abortion highlight the challenges posed by rushed law-making and executive overreach. And we look ahead to the next phase of the assisted dying debate, as supporters in the House of Commons prepare for a renewed legislative push in the next parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

20 Mar 2026
Read more

Submissions / Written Parliamentary Questions - Our evidence to the House of Commons Procedure Committee

The use of Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) is rising sharply. Since July 2024, MPs have tabled questions at unprecedented levels. By late 2025 MPs were tabling over 600 per sitting day, more than double the long-term average. WPQs are a cornerstone of parliamentary scrutiny, helping MPs obtain information, challenge government policy and put issues on the public record. But this surge raises important questions about how Parliament balances transparency and accountability with the practical limits of the system. The House of Commons Procedure Committee is now examining the issue and has just published our submission containing our latest data and analysis.

06 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

13 Mar 2026
Read more

Categories

Themes

Contact

Legal

Fundraising Regulator logo