News

Former Prime Ministers: The role of Parliament in life after No 10 - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 109

3 Oct 2025

In this episode, we speak with Peter Just, author of a new book, Margaret Thatcher: Life After Downing Street. Peter explores how Thatcher reinvented herself after her departure to maintain her status as an international figure, and how she remained a parliamentary thorn in John Major’s side. We also compare her parliamentary afterlife with that of other Prime Ministers, and consider the value that former leaders can bring to the institution of Parliament.

Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

Peter Just’s new book, Margaret Thatcher: Life After Downing Street, explores the political afterlife of Margaret Thatcher, once she had left No. 10. Peter explains how Thatcher reinvented herself as a global political figure, championing British business abroad, and how she exerted a continued influence on domestic politics and parliamentary life.

We also compare her legacy with that of other ex-Prime Ministers, including the unusually active parliamentary role of Theresa May, and consider what value former Prime Ministers bring when they stay engaged in the work of Parliament.

Peter explains how, after her personally devastating departure, Thatcher built a new role with the support of trusted aides. Though her interventions in the House of Commons were rare, her mere presence in Parliament carried weight. She became a political irritant to John Major’s Government – encouraging rebels over Maastricht and criticising the Government’s policy on Bosnia – yet behind the scenes she was often a diplomatic and commercial asset.

Peter Just. ©

Peter Just

Peter Just

Peter Just studied history and politics at the University of Hull, where he is a research associate of the Centre for Legislative Studies. He has studied the lives of former Prime Ministers since the dramatic resignation of Margaret Thatcher in 1990, his research being published in the Journal of Legislative Studies. His first book, Margaret Thatcher: Life After Downing Street was published in July 2025 and covers Baroness Thatcher’s work after ceasing to be Prime Minister, analysing her influence in Parliament, on the world stage, and on subsequent leaders of the Conservative Party and Prime Ministers of all parties during the rest of her lifetime and up to the present day.

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

[00:00:00] Intro: You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm

[00:00:17] Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

[00:00:24] Mark D’Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. For many people, Margaret Thatcher's tearful departure from Downing Street was the last they saw of the Iron Lady. But Mrs Thatcher remained a very active political player for many years after she left office. She was a force in Conservative politics and a thorn in the side of her successor. She was feted in America. She devoted a great deal of effort to batting for British business abroad.

[00:00:47] Ruth Fox: Peter Just has studied the post-premiership years of post-War Prime Ministers. He came into the studio to talk to us about his new book on the afterlife of Mrs T.

[00:01:02] Mark D’Arcy: So Peter, first all, let's set the scene here. Margaret Thatcher leaves office, what must have felt to her, very, very abruptly, after the Michael Heseltine leadership challenge and the political crisis that had led up to it. What was the impact on her? Did she step out of Downing Street and immediately find her feet as an ex-Prime Minister? Did it take a bit of a while to get over the whole experience? What went on?

[00:01:27] Peter Just: I think there was no doubt that it was totally devastating to her, the way she left and how quickly she left. Ian Dale in his biography - I shouldn't be plugging someone else's, but I will because he employed me - he talks about having post-traumatic stress disorder and I think that that is a totally legitimate thing to have said.

It was obviously totally devastating. It took her some time to recover, but I think all of our views have been shaped by that photograph of her getting in the car and crying, leaving Downing Street, about her life after that. Actually, when you look at it from 1991 onwards when she employed Sir Julian Seymour, we should pay tribute to him who he sadly died in March, he was the director of her office, and Sir Mark Worthington, who worked for her from 1992, they helped her build a completely new life. And actually there is a part of a life that we all know about in the UK, which is essentially around how she got on with John Major and the difficulty she caused his Government.

What is less well known, or was less well known until I wrote the book about it, is her global role. And actually that started incredibly early, so I think it was in February 1991, she went to a birthday party for Ronald Reagan and was feted in America. She was a superstar. She got two standing ovations.

So it's all quite early on abroad that new life started to be built. I think it just took longer here because of the nature of the issues that she continued to be involved in here were themselves, were they not, hugely politically controversial.

[00:02:50] Mark D’Arcy: But what were the options for an ex-Prime Minister? Because there were several ex-Prime Ministers around at the time, notably her immediate predecessor, James Callaghan. What were the options available? How could you go about being a former Prime Minister? What do you do?

[00:03:06] Peter Just: Well, Asquith said, didn't he, that the office of Prime Minister is what its holder is able to and choose to make of it. I think that's even more the case for an ex-Prime Minister. There is actually no defined role about what they actually do.

It's essentially up to them. She continued to attend Parliament. She didn't intervene very often, unlike Callaghan who was intervening all the time. But again, she had an international role that came about, not just because of her, it's because she was in such demand in other countries to go and visit them and do the lecture tours.

Of course, she needed to make money because she had absolutely no money in her bank account when she resigned as Prime Minister…

Subscribe to Parliament Matters

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

News / What are the Usual Channels? A short history of Westminster whipping - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 108

In this episode, we talk to political journalist Seb Whale about his new book, The Usual Channels, which reveals the hidden world of Westminster’s whips. Seb charts how party discipline has evolved – from the stormy politics of the 1970s and the Maastricht battles of the 1990s to the legendary “black book,” the Brexit showdowns and the short-lived Liz Truss premiership. He explains how the whips’ office has adapted to a modern Parliament – especially with the influx of women MPs – and why, even today, whips still wield decisive influence over MPs’ careers and remain indispensable despite the pressures of contemporary politics. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

26 Sep 2025
Read more

Blog / Treaty scrutiny: addressing the accountability gap

In this guest blog, Lord Goldsmith KC, Chair of the House of Lords International Agreements Committee (IAC), sets out the findings of the Committee’s latest report urging reform of Parliament's outdated system for scrutinising treaties. The report warns that Westminster lags behind other legislatures in overseeing these vital policy instruments. Rejecting successive governments' defence of the status quo, it argues that government objections to reform are unconvincing and meaningful accountability is overdue.

23 Sep 2025
Read more

News / Assisted dying bill - special series #17: Peers give the Bill a Second Reading, but progress is paused for committee evidence - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 107

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has cleared another key hurdle: it was given a Second Reading in the House of Lords without a formal vote. But Peers have agreed to set up a special select committee to hear evidence from Ministers, professional bodies and legal experts before the Bill goes any further. That decision pushes the detailed clause-by-clause scrutiny back to mid-November and could shape the Bill’s prospects in unexpected ways. In this episode we explore the procedural twists and political manoeuvring behind that decision. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

20 Sep 2025
Read more

Briefings / The assisted dying bill: A guide to the legislative process in the House of Lords

Having passed through the House of Commons, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - the Bill to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales - must now go through its legislative stages in the House of Lords. This guide explains the special procedures for legislation in the House of Lords, and for Private Members’ Bills in particular. It answers some frequently asked questions, including how Peers might block the Bill, and gives an explanation of each stage of the process, from Second to Third Reading.

10 Sep 2025
Read more

Briefings / Delegated powers in the assisted dying bill: Issues for the attention of the House of Lords

Like many pieces of primary legislation, the assisted dying bill leaves much of the practical and policy detail to be worked out later by Ministers through regulations. After the Bill’s Second Reading in the House of Commons, we published a briefing which drew attention to two of its delegated powers. But since then the Bill has been heavily amended, prompting new questions: how have its delegated powers evolved, do these changes strengthen or weaken the approach to the delegation of ministerial power, and are further amendments needed and if so, why?

29 Aug 2025
Read more