One of the Speaker’s first decisions will be to decide a date for the election of the Deputy Speakers. The House of Commons has three Deputy Speakers who assist the Speaker by chairing debates in his absence. So what happens in the interim until the Deputy Speakers are appointed? Unlike the Speaker, the Deputy Speakers do not resign from their party when they take up their post. How are the three posts allocated between the parties?
On the day of the King’s Speech, pending the election of the Deputy Speakers, the Speaker nominates up to three MPs to serve temporarily in the role. In 2019 the temporary Deputy Speakers were Sir Roger Gale, Sir George Howarth, and Sir Gary Streeter (only Sir Roger Gale is seeking re-election to Parliament at the General Election).
The Standing Orders do not specify a date for the Deputy Speakers’ election, only that the Speaker sets out the arrangements:
“At the commencement of every Parliament, or from time to time, as necessity may arise, the Speaker shall notify the House of the arrangements to be made to elect a Chairman of Ways and Means and two Deputy Chairmen of Ways and Means…” [1]
However, the Standing Orders do require the ballot to be held between 11am and noon on the day appointed for the election.
In recent years, the election of Deputy Speakers has been held between four and six sitting days after the King’s Speech. The precise date will depend on whether the House sits on Friday 19 July and when the House rises for Summer recess. The Speaker normally announces the date for the election around the time of the King’s Speech.
The first Deputy Speaker is the Chairman of Ways and Means, who historically presided over debates on financial matters. The Chairman of Ways and Means continues to have duties beyond those of the two other Deputy Speakers, such as normally presiding over the Budget debate, any Committee of the Whole House, and in connection with legislative committees, private bills and Westminster Hall sittings
Under Standing Order No.2A, the Chairman of Ways and Means and the Second Deputy Chairman should come from the opposite side of the House to the Speaker, while the First Deputy Chairman should be from the same side of the House as the Speaker.[2] The Standing Order also prescribes that among the Speaker and three Deputy Speakers there should be at least one man and one woman.
As Sir Lindsay Hoyle was previously a Labour MP then, assuming Labour wins the General Election, one of the three Deputy Speaker must be chosen from the Government benches and the other two Deputy Speakers from the Opposition ranks. The Chairman of Ways and Means must come from the Opposition benches. Of the three Deputy Speakers in the last Parliament (Dame Eleanor Laing (Cons), Dame Rosie Winterton (Lab) and Nigel Evans (Cons)) only the latter is seeking re-election at the General Election. It is likely that if returned to Parliament he will seek re-election as one of the Deputy Speakers.
The three Deputy Speakers are elected by secret ballot, using the Single Transferable Vote system.
Nominations for the Deputy Speakerships must be submitted between 10am and 5pm on the day before the election. Candidates require the support of between six and 10 Members. The elections are held between 11am and 12 noon, with the winners taking-up their posts the following day.
Once elected, Deputy Speakers remain in office until the dissolution of the Parliament, unless they resign or otherwise cease to be an MP.
[1] Standing Order No.2, House of Commons Standing Orders for Public Business, as at 23 October 2023
[2] Standing Order No.2A, House of Commons Standing Orders for Public Business, as at 23 October 2023
The new Parliament will assemble on Tuesday 9 July 2024, five days after the General Election. This guide explains the ceremonial, legislative, organisational and procedural processes that are engaged at the start of the Parliament. It examines the challenges a July General Election poses to the parliamentary calendar over the Summer and looks at the Government's plans with respect to legislation and public finances.
The UK Spending Review outlines how Government funds will be allocated over several years. Unlike the Budget, which raises revenue, the Review decides how it is spent. But how is it approved? What role does Parliament play if it doesn’t vote on the Review itself? This blog explores how the Spending Review works, how it differs from the Budget, and how Parliament holds the Government to account through the Estimates process.
On Friday 13 June, the House of Commons will once again debate the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales. Specifically, it will hold a second day of Report Stage, during which the whole House will debate and vote on amendments. This briefing explains the structure of Report Stage, what happened on the first day of Report Stage, how amendments are selected and grouped, on which amendments a decision can still be taken, and the likely sequence of events this Friday, including whether a final vote will take place.
The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves MP, will deliver a statement on the Spending Review. MPs will resume Report Stage of the assisted dying bill and debate key legislation on football governance, mental health, and planning and infrastructure. Peers and MPs are expected to resolve their standoff over AI and copyright in the Data (Use and Access) Bill. The Commons Defence Committee will hear from the lead reviewers of the Strategic Defence Review, while a Lords Committee will examine the Chagos Archipelago sovereignty issue. The Hansard Society’s Director will give evidence to the Modernisation Committee about access to the House of Commons and its procedures.
In this episode, we explore why ministers keep bypassing Parliament to make major announcements to the media — and whether returning to the Despatch Box might help clarify their message. We unpack the Lords' uphill battle to protect creators’ rights in the Data Use and Access Bill, challenge claims that the Assisted Dying Bill lacks scrutiny, and examine early findings from a Speaker’s Conference on improving security for MPs, as threats and intimidation against politicians continue to rise. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.
Our evidence on treaty scrutiny has been published by the House of Lords International Agreements Committee. Our submission outlines the problems with the existing framework for treaty scrutiny and why legislative and cultural change are needed to improve Parliament's scrutiny role. Our evidence joins calls for a parliamentary consent vote for the most significant agreements, a stronger role for Parliament in shaping negotiating mandates and monitoring progress, and a sifting committee tasked with determining which agreements warrant the greatest scrutiny.
