Publications / Briefings

Back to Business: Election of the Speaker

3 Jul 2024
Sir Lindsay Hoyle MP 'dragged' to the chair, having been elected as Speaker of the House of Commons, 4 November 2019. ©UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor
Sir Lindsay Hoyle MP 'dragged' to the chair, having been elected as Speaker of the House of Commons, 4 November 2019. ©UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor

The first item of business for MPs will be the election of their Speaker. Sir Lindsay Hoyle is seeking re-election. How will the election process work? The Father (or Mother) of the House presides over the election: who will that be? Why will the Speaker-elect be 'dragged' to the Chair by MPs? What role does the Monarch and the House of Lords play in the process?

Between the summoning of the new Parliament on Tuesday 9 July and the State Opening of Parliament on Wednesday 17 July a series of important procedures that mark the start of any new Parliament will be implemented: the receipt of the Return Book confirming the election of all MPs; the election of the Speaker of the House of Commons; the approval of the Speaker’s election and his laying claim to the “ancient and undoubted rights and privileges” of the House on behalf of MPs; and the swearing-in of all Members of both Houses.

The procedures initiating the election of the Speaker and his approval in office by the Monarch are set out in Standing Orders 1, 1A and 1B.[1]

On Tuesday 9 July, Black Rod will be sent to summon the House of Commons to attend the House of Lords. There, the Lords Commissioners - a group of Privy Counsellors who are appointed by the King to carry out specific tasks in Parliament on his behalf when he is not present in person - will direct MPs to choose a Speaker. The Commissioners are likely to include the Speaker of the House, the Leader of the House (in the event that Labour wins the General Election this is likely to be Baroness Smith of Basildon), the Shadow Leader of the House and the Convenor of the Crossbench Peers.

On their return to the House of Commons, MPs will begin the process of electing a Speaker immediately. The process is overseen by the Father or Mother of the House, namely the Member with the longest continuous service who is not a Minister.

The Father or Mother of the House will ask Sir Lindsay Hoyle, who was Speaker at the dissolution of the previous Parliament, if he is again willing to serve as Speaker. As Sir Lindsay is seeking re-election to the House of Commons – and so by convention has faced no opposition in his constituency from the major parties – it is expected he will seek to be re-elected.

If the Speaker in the previous Parliament seeks re-election to the Chair, a motion is put before the House by a Member for consideration forthwith, “that (name of former Speaker) do take the Chair of this House as Speaker”.[2] The vote on the motion is usually taken ‘by acclamation’ (that is by MPs shouting in support of or opposition to the motion). It is customary that the motion is uncontested and the former Speaker is re-elected. Exceptionally, if MPs audibly shout in opposition to the motion then a division (a formal vote requiring MPs to go through the voting lobbies to record their decision) will be needed.

Once the question is agreed to, the Father or Mother of the House will leave the Chair and return to the backbenches. The Speaker-elect will be ‘dragged’ from his place on the backbenches to the Chair by other Members. This custom is rooted in the history of the office of the Speaker.

In previous centuries one of the Speaker’s roles was to communicate the opinions and decisions of the House of Commons to the Monarch. On several occasions, the Speaker was executed for conveying messages that were not to the liking of the Monarch. Understandably, some MPs were therefore reluctant to accept the position.

Having been conveyed to the Chair the Speaker-elect will say a few words to acknowledge and thank the House for the honour it has bestowed and then take the Chair. At this point the Mace will be placed upon the table in front of the Speaker-elect (this is the symbol of Royal authority within Parliament). Brief speeches of congratulation by each of the party leaders will then follow. However, the Speaker is not confirmed in office until the House of Commons’ choice is approved by the Monarch.

Assuming that Sir Lindsay Hoyle’s re-election on 9 July passes without controversy, the following day Black Rod will again be sent to summon the House of Commons to attend the House of Lords to confirm the choice of Speaker. (In 2019, when the Government wished to proceed rapidly with Brexit-related legislation, exceptionally Black Rod was sent to the House of Lords on the same day as the re-election of the Speaker. In 2010, 2015 and 2017, however, Black Rod summoned the House of Commons the day after the election of the Speaker.)

The King will not be present, but will again be represented by the Lords Commissioners, who will be robed and seated between the Throne and the Woolsack.

“It not being convenient for His Majesty to be personally present here this day”, the Lords Commissioners will be empowered, by Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the Realm, to “do all things in His Majesty’s name, which are to be done on His Majesty’s part in this Parliament.”[4]

On arrival in the House of Lords, the Speaker-elect will inform the Lords Commissioners:

“That in obedience to the Royal Command, His Majesty’s most faithful Commons have, in the exercise of their undoubted rights and privileges, preceded to the election of a Speaker, and that their choice has fallen upon myself. I therefore present myself to your Lordships’ Bar and submit myself with all humility for His Majesty’s gracious Approbation.”[5]

The presiding Commissioners will, on behalf of the Monarch, then approve and confirm his election.

The Speaker lays claim, by ‘humble petition’, to the “ancient and undoubted rights and privileges” of the House of Commons from the Crown. This is an assertion of the parliamentary privilege granted to Members of the House of Commons dating back to the Bill of Rights of 1689.[6]

The “rights and privileges” include freedom of speech, freedom from arrest, and freedom of access to His Majesty whenever required via the Speaker. These will be duly granted by the Lords Commissioners on the Monarch’s behalf.

Having received the Approbation, the Speaker will then return to the House of Commons.

[4] Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords, Appendix F, Opening of a new Parliament and election of Commons Speaker

[5] Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords, Appendix F, Opening of a new Parliament and election of Commons Speaker

©UK Parliament/Maria Unger

The new Parliament will assemble on Tuesday 9 July 2024, five days after the General Election. This guide explains the ceremonial, legislative, organisational and procedural processes that are engaged at the start of the Parliament. It examines the challenges a July General Election poses to the parliamentary calendar over the Summer and looks at the Government's plans with respect to legislation and public finances.

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 16-20 March 2026

The Defence Secretary, John Healey, will face questions from MPs. The Grenfell Tower (Memorial Expenditure) Bill and the Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Bill will be fast-tracked through all their Commons stages in a single day. MPs will debate online safety, an e-petition calling for automatic by-elections when MPs defect to another party, and the Conservative Party will choose the Opposition Day debate. The Justice Committee will hear from the Victims’ Commissioner on the Courts and Tribunals Bill, the Public Accounts Committee will question officials about the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster, and experts will give evidence on the Representation of the People Bill. In the Lords, Peers will continue scrutiny of the Crime and Policing, Pensions Schemes, and Finance (No. 2) Bills. Lord Arbuthnot will ask about Fujitsu contributing to compensation in the Post Office Horizon case, and Peers will debate terrorism, abortion, AI, and assisted dying.

15 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

13 Mar 2026
Read more

Briefings / Last-minute powers and limited scrutiny: Parliament and the risks of consigning online safety law to delegated legislation

Two late-stage government amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill would grant Ministers significant powers to reshape key parts of the Online Safety Act through delegated legislation. While the policy goals may attract support, the method raises serious constitutional concerns about parliamentary scrutiny and accountability. Using these amendments as a case study, this briefing explores the risks of relying on regulations to make policy and explains how the Hansard Society’s proposed reforms to the delegated legislation scrutiny system could better balance governmental flexibility with democratic oversight.

09 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Is the assisted dying bill being filibustered? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 135

Debate over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been so slow in the House of Lords that opponents of the Bill are accused of deliberately running down the clock. Conservative Peer Lord Harper rejects claims of filibustering, arguing that Peers are undertaking necessary scrutiny of a flawed and complex bill. He contends the legislation lacks adequate safeguards and was unsuited to the Private Member’s Bill process and discusses whether MPs might attempt to revive it in a future parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

10 Mar 2026
Read more

Blog / The Backbench Business Committee 15 years on: Has it given backbench MPs a stronger voice in the House of Commons?

Fifteen years after its creation, the Backbench Business Committee has become an important mechanism through which MPs can secure debates and raise issues in the House of Commons. Drawing on new research analysing debate transcripts and interviews with MPs, Ministers and officials, this blogpost analyses the Committee’s impact on parliamentary agenda-setting and cross-party campaigning. It highlights how the Committee has transformed opportunities for backbenchers while identifying ongoing challenges around participation, transparency and the Committee’s potential role in representing backbench interests more broadly.

07 Mar 2026
Read more