Publications / Briefings

Back to Business: Swearing-in

3 Jul 2024
Michael Shanks sworn-in as an MP, 16 October 2023. ©UK Parliament/Andy Bailey
Michael Shanks sworn-in as an MP, 16 October 2023. ©UK Parliament/Andy Bailey

The swearing-in of MPs usually begins the day after the Speaker’s election and can take several days; no other business is generally conducted before the King’s Speech. Why must MPs swear in? They can choose to take the 'Oath of Allegiance' of make a 'solemn Affirmation': what's the difference? How do Members of the House of Lords swear in?

The newly-elected Speaker swears the Oath of Allegiance in the House of Commons first, before all other Members, on his return from the House of Lords.

He will then be followed by other MPs in order of seniority beginning with the Father and Mother of the House, the Prime Minister and other members of the Cabinet. All other MPs are then called to take the Oath/Affirmation, usually starting with the shadow Cabinet and Privy Counsellors, followed by non-Cabinet ministers, and then other MPs in order of the Parliament in which they most recently entered the House.

A list of all those MPs returned at the General Election is formally submitted to the Clerk of the House of Commons by the Clerk of the Crown in Chancery. This is a ceremonial position for the conveying of the Crown’s commands to Parliament held by the Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Justice (who is currently Dame Antonia Romeo).

The list of newly elected MPs is contained in a vellum-bound Return Book known colloquially as the ‘White Book’, reflecting the colour of the binding. (In practice, the list may be conveyed by the Deputy Clerk of the Crown in a copy of the Return Book.)

At the table of the House of Commons, in the presence of the Speaker a senior Clerk will invite each MP in turn to swear the Oath or indicate whether they wish to Affirm their allegiance.

If they take the Oath, the words are:

“I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles, his heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.”

If they choose to make a ‘solemn Affirmation’ the words are:

“I (name of MP) do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm, that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles, his heirs and successors, according to law.”

The Oath / Affirmation must be taken / made in English first, but Members can follow this by taking it in the Welsh, Scots Gaelic or Cornish languages.

Once the Oath or the Affirmation has been administered, each MP signs the ‘Test Roll’ at the table in the House and is then introduced to the Speaker. The parchment book is known as the ‘Test Roll’ because historically the act of signing it was used to prove – or test – an MP’s loyalty to the Crown.

There are 15 different holy books that Members can swear their oaths on. ©UK Parliament / Jessica Taylor
There are 15 different holy books that Members can swear their oaths on. ©UK Parliament / Jessica Taylor

Three to four hours each day for two to four days may be set aside to enable all MPs to be sworn-in; the length of time set aside for the process is a matter for the Speaker. In 2019, when the Government wished to move quickly to begin consideration of Brexit-related legislation, swearing-in started on the day of the Speaker’s election.

Once swearing-in is complete, the House will adjourn until the day of the King’s Speech.

It is vital that all MPs take the Oath or Affirmation. By law, no MP can participate in the proceedings of the House (with the exception of the election of the Speaker) unless and until they have been sworn-in.

Under the Parliamentary Oaths Act 1866, any MP who votes, or sits during any debate after the Speaker has been chosen, before they are sworn-in, will be subject to a £500 penalty; but more importantly their seat is vacated “in the same manner as if he were dead.”[1] A writ for a by-election would then be moved.

Once sworn-in, it had been customary for MPs not to participate in proceedings until they had made their Maiden Speech. However, this custom was relaxed in the 2010 Parliament because of the number of new MPs. As there will be many first-time MPs in the new Parliament, this relaxation of the custom may be repeated.

Sinn Fein have a policy of abstentionism from Westminster and their MPs decline to take the Oath or make the Affirmation because it would require them to swear allegiance to the British Monarch. As a result, they cannot take their seats, participate in parliamentary proceedings or draw a salary. However, they can claim parliamentary expenses for office and staffing costs as well as some accommodation and travel expenses.

The swearing-in of Peers in the House of Lords is similar to that of MPs in the House of Commons. Members of the Upper House present their ‘writ of summons’ to attend the Parliament and swear the Oath / Affirmation. Additionally, they must sign a commitment to abide by the House of Lords Code of Conduct.

©UK Parliament/Maria Unger

The new Parliament will assemble on Tuesday 9 July 2024, five days after the General Election. This guide explains the ceremonial, legislative, organisational and procedural processes that are engaged at the start of the Parliament. It examines the challenges a July General Election poses to the parliamentary calendar over the Summer and looks at the Government's plans with respect to legislation and public finances.

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 16-20 March 2026

The Defence Secretary, John Healey, will face questions from MPs. The Grenfell Tower (Memorial Expenditure) Bill and the Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Bill will be fast-tracked through all their Commons stages in a single day. MPs will debate online safety, an e-petition calling for automatic by-elections when MPs defect to another party, and the Conservative Party will choose the Opposition Day debate. The Justice Committee will hear from the Victims’ Commissioner on the Courts and Tribunals Bill, the Public Accounts Committee will question officials about the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster, and experts will give evidence on the Representation of the People Bill. In the Lords, Peers will continue scrutiny of the Crime and Policing, Pensions Schemes, and Finance (No. 2) Bills. Lord Arbuthnot will ask about Fujitsu contributing to compensation in the Post Office Horizon case, and Peers will debate terrorism, abortion, AI, and assisted dying.

15 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Jury trials under threat? The Courts and Tribunals Bill explained - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 136

Plans to restrict the right to a jury trial have cleared their Second Reading in the Commons, but the proposals in the Courts and Tribunals Bill face growing resistance, including from Labour rebels. We discuss the legal and constitutional implications with barrister Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, examining what the reforms could mean for defendants’ rights and the criminal courts system. We also assess the passage of legislation removing hereditary Peers from Parliament, and the late compromise that eased opposition in the House of Lords. Meanwhile Sir Lindsay Hoyle clashes with the Chief Whip over delays in the division lobby, and newly released papers on Peter Mandelson’s Washington appointment raise fresh political questions. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

13 Mar 2026
Read more

Briefings / Last-minute powers and limited scrutiny: Parliament and the risks of consigning online safety law to delegated legislation

Two late-stage government amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill would grant Ministers significant powers to reshape key parts of the Online Safety Act through delegated legislation. While the policy goals may attract support, the method raises serious constitutional concerns about parliamentary scrutiny and accountability. Using these amendments as a case study, this briefing explores the risks of relying on regulations to make policy and explains how the Hansard Society’s proposed reforms to the delegated legislation scrutiny system could better balance governmental flexibility with democratic oversight.

09 Mar 2026
Read more

News / Is the assisted dying bill being filibustered? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 135

Debate over the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has been so slow in the House of Lords that opponents of the Bill are accused of deliberately running down the clock. Conservative Peer Lord Harper rejects claims of filibustering, arguing that Peers are undertaking necessary scrutiny of a flawed and complex bill. He contends the legislation lacks adequate safeguards and was unsuited to the Private Member’s Bill process and discusses whether MPs might attempt to revive it in a future parliamentary Session. Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · Acast · YouTube · Other apps · RSS

10 Mar 2026
Read more

Blog / The Backbench Business Committee 15 years on: Has it given backbench MPs a stronger voice in the House of Commons?

Fifteen years after its creation, the Backbench Business Committee has become an important mechanism through which MPs can secure debates and raise issues in the House of Commons. Drawing on new research analysing debate transcripts and interviews with MPs, Ministers and officials, this blogpost analyses the Committee’s impact on parliamentary agenda-setting and cross-party campaigning. It highlights how the Committee has transformed opportunities for backbenchers while identifying ongoing challenges around participation, transparency and the Committee’s potential role in representing backbench interests more broadly.

07 Mar 2026
Read more