Publications / Guides

Back to Business: procedure at the start of a new Parliament (special collection)

13 Dec 2019
Queen Elizabeth Tower, UK Houses of Parliament

At the start of a new Parliament a series of ceremonies and procedures must take place before the Members of the two Houses can get down to business. Our special collection of procedural guides takes you through them, in the order they take place.

A new House of Commons cannot carry out any business until it has elected its Speaker. The Speaker election is therefore the first item of business for a new House and takes place on the first day of the new Parliament.

Show more to get the key points or read the full guide. {: .small}

No MP may take part in any House of Commons proceedings, apart from the election of the Speaker, until he or she has been sworn in. Swearing-in is thus the second item of business in a new House of Commons, once the Speaker has been elected. Swearing-in is normally completed, if not before the Queen’s Speech, then before the start of the debate on it. In the House of Lords, Peers also need to be sworn in at the start of a Parliament.

Show more to get the key points or read the full guide. {: .small}

The State Opening of Parliament, with the Queen's Speech at its centre, is the key ceremonial and constitutional event at the start of a new session of Parliament. At the start of any session, neither House can consider normal public business until the Queen's Speech has been held.

Each new House of Commons must elect three Deputy Speakers, one from the same side of the House as the Speaker and two from the opposite side. Normally, the Deputy Speakers’ election takes place around four to six sitting days after the Queen’s Speech.

Show more to get the key points or read the full guide. {: .small}

Each parliamentary session, each House holds a ballot to allocate legislative time-slots to some Members to introduce Private Members’ Bills (PMBs). The PMB ballot in each House is thus another of the events that must take place early in a new Parliament. In the House of Lords, the ballot for Private Members’ Bills takes place on the day following State Opening. A Peer who wishes to enter the ballot must have the full text of his or her bill ready by the time the ballot takes place. In the House of Commons, the ballot usually takes place on the second Thursday of each parliamentary session.

Select committees in both Houses need to be re-populated with Chairs and Members at the start of a Parliament. In the House of Commons, the process of getting select committees fully up and running can take weeks. Most House of Lords select committees are typically re-established much more quickly.

Several of the ceremonies and procedures that take place at the start of a Parliament take place within days or the first 2-3 weeks. However, completing all the processes involved in getting Parliament fully up and running can take months.

Our interactive graphic compares the timings of key events in a new House of Commons at the start of the 2010, 2015, 2017 and 2019 Parliaments.

The House of Lords moves broadly in tandem with the Commons through the early steps in a new Parliament, but it typically gets most of its select committees up and running much more quickly.

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 21-24 July 2025

The Prime Minister will appear before the House of Commons Liaison Committee. Chancellor Rachel Reeves MP and the Governor of the Bank of England will also appear before committees. Opposition Peers will challenge regulations that would allow foreign states to hold up to 15% of the shares or voting rights in news organisations. Education and Health Ministers will face oral questions from MPs. Peers will consider seven bills. The House of Commons will debate the 80th anniversary of Victory over Japan and hold its Sir David Amess Summer Adjournment debate. Former civil servants Simon Case and Sir Tim Barrow will be introduced to the House of Lords. ❓ We value your thoughts. Please click here to let us know what you think of the Parliament Matters Bulletin in our reader survey.

20 Jul 2025
Read more

News / Parliament gagged by super-injunction? A conversation with Joshua Rozenberg - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 101

Legal expert Joshua Rozenberg joins us this week to unpack the legal and constitutional ramifications of one of the most troubling intersections of government secrecy, national security, and parliamentary accountability in recent memory. Thousands of Afghans who had worked with British forces were placed at risk of Taliban revenge attacks after a catastrophic government data leak in 2022 exposed their details. In response, ministers secured a “super-injunction” – so secret that even its existence could not be reported – effectively silencing public debate and preventing parliamentary scrutiny for almost two years. The breach, only revealed this week, led to a covert resettlement scheme which has already cost taxpayers millions of pounds. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

18 Jul 2025
Read more

News / One year on: How is Parliament performing? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 100

In our 100th episode, we take stock of Parliament one year after the 2024 general election. With a fractured opposition, a dominant Labour government, and a House of Commons still governed by rules designed for a two-party system, how well is this new Parliament really functioning? Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

11 Jul 2025
Read more

News / Labour's welfare meltdown - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 99

It’s been a bruising week for the Government, as a Labour backbench revolt forced ministers to gut their own welfare reforms live in the House of Commons. We explore why Sir Keir Starmer appears to have such a poor grip on parliamentary management. Plus, House of Lords reform expert Professor Meg Russell explains why the hereditary peers bill may be a once-in-a-generation chance to tackle deeper issues — like curbing prime ministerial patronage and reducing the bloated size of the upper chamber. And in Dorking, faith and politics collide over assisted dying. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

04 Jul 2025
Read more

Submissions / Parliamentary scrutiny of treaties - Our evidence to the House of Lords International Agreements Committee

Our evidence on treaty scrutiny has been published by the House of Lords International Agreements Committee. Our submission outlines the problems with the existing framework for treaty scrutiny and why legislative and cultural change are needed to improve Parliament's scrutiny role. Our evidence joins calls for a parliamentary consent vote for the most significant agreements, a stronger role for Parliament in shaping negotiating mandates and monitoring progress, and a sifting committee tasked with determining which agreements warrant the greatest scrutiny.

03 Jun 2025
Read more